Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>:
Bug#51736; Package base-passwd.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgWichert Akkerman  Subject: Bug#51736: base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow Reply-To: Oskar Liljeblad , 51736@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Oskar Liljeblad Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Wichert Akkerman Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:03:12 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 51736 X-Debian-PR-Package: base-passwd X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.94407114014884 (code B ref -1); Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:03:12 GMT From: Oskar Liljeblad To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Mailer: bug 3.2.7 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:58:24 +0100 Package: base-passwd Version: 3.1.1 Severity: normal When I upgraded from base-passwd 3.1 to this version 3.1.1, the user account `dos' was removed. But only from /etc/passwd. It was still in /etc/shadow. (The command `pwck' would detect this, and ask if user `dos' should be deleted.) Oskar Liljeblad (osk@hem.passagen.se) -- System Information Debian Release: potato Kernel Version: Linux oskar 2.2.13 #2 SMP Fri Oct 22 15:40:51 CEST 1999 i686 unknown Versions of the packages base-passwd depends on: ii libc6 2.1.2-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone   Acknowledgement sent to Oskar Liljeblad <osk@hem.passagen.se>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Oskar Liljeblad Subject: Bug#51736: Acknowledgement (base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 51736 Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Wichert Akkerman If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 51736@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to bugs@bugs.debian.org). Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 1999 17:59:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 14879 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1999 17:58:59 -0000 Received: from grynet.passagen.se (195.163.107.36) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 1999 17:58:59 -0000 Received: from oskar (d212-151-43-187.swipnet.se [212.151.43.187]) by grynet.passagen.se (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA12056 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 18:58:55 +0100 (MET) Received: from usel by oskar with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian)) id 11tE1I-0000b0-00; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:58:24 +0100 From: Oskar Liljeblad Subject: base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow To: submit@bugs.debian.org X-Mailer: bug 3.2.7 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:58:24 +0100 Package: base-passwd Version: 3.1.1 Severity: normal When I upgraded from base-passwd 3.1 to this version 3.1.1, the user account `dos' was removed. But only from /etc/passwd. It was still in /etc/shadow. (The command `pwck' would detect this, and ask if user `dos' should be deleted.) Oskar Liljeblad (osk@hem.passagen.se) -- System Information Debian Release: potato Kernel Version: Linux oskar 2.2.13 #2 SMP Fri Oct 22 15:40:51 CEST 1999 i686 unknown Versions of the packages base-passwd depends on: ii libc6 2.1.2-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>:
Bug#51736; Package base-passwd.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgWichert Akkerman  Subject: Bug#51736: base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow Reply-To: Wichert Akkerman , 51736@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Wichert Akkerman Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Wichert Akkerman Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:48:13 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 51736 X-Debian-PR-Package: base-passwd X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 51736-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B51736.94407726828226 (code B ref 51736); Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:48:13 GMT Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:28 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: Oskar Liljeblad , 51736@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <19991201205528.B14020@mors.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y" User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i In-Reply-To: ; from osk@hem.passagen.se on Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 06:58:24PM +0100 --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable severity 51736 wishlist retitle 51736 sanity checking for shadow is missing thanks Previously Oskar Liljeblad wrote: > When I upgraded from base-passwd 3.1 to this version 3.1.1, > the user account `dos' was removed. But only from /etc/passwd. > It was still in /etc/shadow. (The command `pwck' would > detect this, and ask if user `dos' should be deleted.) It's on the todo-list; right now update-passwd doesn't do anything with the shadow-file. I wanted to be sure all the other functionality was working before adding new features. Wichert. --=20 ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjhFfTAACgkQPLiSUC+jvC18MACfXjaAsH6panPBvE4y+MuUfEvL dmEAniffTrG/1am/RHqFBTz4+IfxtSo8 =IhD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--   Acknowledgement sent to Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Wichert Akkerman Subject: Bug#51736: Info received (was Bug#51736: base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <19991201205528.B14020@mors.net> References: <19991201205528.B14020@mors.net> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 51736 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Wichert Akkerman If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 51736@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 51736) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 1999 19:41:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 28209 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1999 19:41:04 -0000 Received: from janeway.cistron.net (root@195.64.65.23) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 1999 19:41:04 -0000 Received: from lightning.mors.net (root@wichert.cistron.nl [195.64.66.141]) by janeway.cistron.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id UAA10806; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:40:57 +0100 Received: (from wichert@localhost) by lightning.mors.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id UAA14051; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:28 +0100 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:28 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: Oskar Liljeblad , 51736@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#51736: base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow Message-ID: <19991201205528.B14020@mors.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y" User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i In-Reply-To: ; from osk@hem.passagen.se on Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 06:58:24PM +0100 --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable severity 51736 wishlist retitle 51736 sanity checking for shadow is missing thanks Previously Oskar Liljeblad wrote: > When I upgraded from base-passwd 3.1 to this version 3.1.1, > the user account `dos' was removed. But only from /etc/passwd. > It was still in /etc/shadow. (The command `pwck' would > detect this, and ask if user `dos' should be deleted.) It's on the todo-list; right now update-passwd doesn't do anything with the shadow-file. I wanted to be sure all the other functionality was working before adding new features. Wichert. --=20 ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjhFfTAACgkQPLiSUC+jvC18MACfXjaAsH6panPBvE4y+MuUfEvL dmEAniffTrG/1am/RHqFBTz4+IfxtSo8 =IhD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--   Severity set to `wishlist'. Request was from Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 1999 19:41:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 28209 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1999 19:41:04 -0000 Received: from janeway.cistron.net (root@195.64.65.23) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 1999 19:41:04 -0000 Received: from lightning.mors.net (root@wichert.cistron.nl [195.64.66.141]) by janeway.cistron.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id UAA10806; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:40:57 +0100 Received: (from wichert@localhost) by lightning.mors.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id UAA14051; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:28 +0100 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:28 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: Oskar Liljeblad , 51736@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#51736: base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow Message-ID: <19991201205528.B14020@mors.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y" User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i In-Reply-To: ; from osk@hem.passagen.se on Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 06:58:24PM +0100 --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable severity 51736 wishlist retitle 51736 sanity checking for shadow is missing thanks Previously Oskar Liljeblad wrote: > When I upgraded from base-passwd 3.1 to this version 3.1.1, > the user account `dos' was removed. But only from /etc/passwd. > It was still in /etc/shadow. (The command `pwck' would > detect this, and ask if user `dos' should be deleted.) It's on the todo-list; right now update-passwd doesn't do anything with the shadow-file. I wanted to be sure all the other functionality was working before adding new features. Wichert. --=20 ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjhFfTAACgkQPLiSUC+jvC18MACfXjaAsH6panPBvE4y+MuUfEvL dmEAniffTrG/1am/RHqFBTz4+IfxtSo8 =IhD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--   Changed Bug title. Request was from Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 1999 19:41:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 28209 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1999 19:41:04 -0000 Received: from janeway.cistron.net (root@195.64.65.23) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 1999 19:41:04 -0000 Received: from lightning.mors.net (root@wichert.cistron.nl [195.64.66.141]) by janeway.cistron.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id UAA10806; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:40:57 +0100 Received: (from wichert@localhost) by lightning.mors.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id UAA14051; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:28 +0100 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:28 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: Oskar Liljeblad , 51736@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#51736: base-passwd: user was removed in /etc/passwd during upgrade, but not in /etc/shadow Message-ID: <19991201205528.B14020@mors.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y" User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre4i In-Reply-To: ; from osk@hem.passagen.se on Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 06:58:24PM +0100 --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable severity 51736 wishlist retitle 51736 sanity checking for shadow is missing thanks Previously Oskar Liljeblad wrote: > When I upgraded from base-passwd 3.1 to this version 3.1.1, > the user account `dos' was removed. But only from /etc/passwd. > It was still in /etc/shadow. (The command `pwck' would > detect this, and ask if user `dos' should be deleted.) It's on the todo-list; right now update-passwd doesn't do anything with the shadow-file. I wanted to be sure all the other functionality was working before adding new features. Wichert. --=20 ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjhFfTAACgkQPLiSUC+jvC18MACfXjaAsH6panPBvE4y+MuUfEvL dmEAniffTrG/1am/RHqFBTz4+IfxtSo8 =IhD3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--   Bug closed, send any further explanations to Oskar Liljeblad <osk@hem.passagen.se> Request was from Oskar Liljeblad <oskar@osk.mine.nu> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2002 19:32:03 +0000 From oskar@osk.mine.nu Tue Nov 12 13:32:03 2002 Return-path: Received: from as2-1-6.lh.m.bonet.se (alpha) [194.236.130.162] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18BglT-0000y5-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:31:59 -0600 Received: from oskar ([192.168.1.2] ident=mail) by alpha with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Bgka-0008Jy-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:31:04 +0100 Received: from usel by oskar with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BglQ-0003L9-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:31:56 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:31:56 +0100 To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: no longer using osk@hem.passagen.se Message-ID: <20021112193156.GA12829@oskar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Oskar Liljeblad Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: close 34363 reopen 34363 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 37735 reopen 37735 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 48811 reopen 48811 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 54697 reopen 54697 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 54905 reopen 54905 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 55638 reopen 55638 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 56647 reopen 56647 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 59662 reopen 59662 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 60672 reopen 60672 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 63205 reopen 63205 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 68396 reopen 68396 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 82031 reopen 82031 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 87048 reopen 87048 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 92121 reopen 92121 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 92215 reopen 92215 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94858 reopen 94858 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 99168 reopen 99168 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 39757 reopen 39757 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 48294 reopen 48294 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 50982 reopen 50982 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 51736 reopen 51736 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 52126 reopen 52126 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 53520 reopen 53520 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 55637 reopen 55637 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 55890 reopen 55890 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 64222 reopen 64222 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 76151 reopen 76151 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 81771 reopen 81771 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 83352 reopen 83352 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 84169 reopen 84169 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 85613 reopen 85613 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94512 reopen 94512 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94765 reopen 94765 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 95435 reopen 95435 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 95557 reopen 95557 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 103612 reopen 103612 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 103615 reopen 103615 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 107713 reopen 107713 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 51653 reopen 51653 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 66591 reopen 66591 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 103619 reopen 103619 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 111423 reopen 111423 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94664 reopen 94664 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 83991 reopen 83991 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 51895 reopen 51895 oskar@osk.mine.nu   Bug reopened, originator set to oskar@osk.mine.nu. Request was from Oskar Liljeblad <oskar@osk.mine.nu> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Nov 2002 19:32:03 +0000 From oskar@osk.mine.nu Tue Nov 12 13:32:03 2002 Return-path: Received: from as2-1-6.lh.m.bonet.se (alpha) [194.236.130.162] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18BglT-0000y5-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:31:59 -0600 Received: from oskar ([192.168.1.2] ident=mail) by alpha with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Bgka-0008Jy-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:31:04 +0100 Received: from usel by oskar with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18BglQ-0003L9-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:31:56 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:31:56 +0100 To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: no longer using osk@hem.passagen.se Message-ID: <20021112193156.GA12829@oskar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Oskar Liljeblad Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: close 34363 reopen 34363 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 37735 reopen 37735 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 48811 reopen 48811 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 54697 reopen 54697 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 54905 reopen 54905 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 55638 reopen 55638 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 56647 reopen 56647 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 59662 reopen 59662 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 60672 reopen 60672 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 63205 reopen 63205 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 68396 reopen 68396 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 82031 reopen 82031 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 87048 reopen 87048 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 92121 reopen 92121 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 92215 reopen 92215 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94858 reopen 94858 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 99168 reopen 99168 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 39757 reopen 39757 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 48294 reopen 48294 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 50982 reopen 50982 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 51736 reopen 51736 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 52126 reopen 52126 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 53520 reopen 53520 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 55637 reopen 55637 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 55890 reopen 55890 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 64222 reopen 64222 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 76151 reopen 76151 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 81771 reopen 81771 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 83352 reopen 83352 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 84169 reopen 84169 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 85613 reopen 85613 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94512 reopen 94512 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94765 reopen 94765 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 95435 reopen 95435 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 95557 reopen 95557 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 103612 reopen 103612 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 103615 reopen 103615 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 107713 reopen 107713 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 51653 reopen 51653 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 66591 reopen 66591 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 103619 reopen 103619 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 111423 reopen 111423 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 94664 reopen 94664 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 83991 reopen 83991 oskar@osk.mine.nu close 51895 reopen 51895 oskar@osk.mine.nu