<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#91735</code>; Package <code>debfoster</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgIvo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#91735: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
Reply-To: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>, 91735@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Orignal-Sender: Joey Hess <joey@dragon.kitenet.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:03:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.91735.B.98559719619819@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91735
X-Debian-PR-Package: debfoster
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.98559719619819
          (code B ref -1); Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:03:02 GMT
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net>
Sender: Joey Hess <joey@dragon.kitenet.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:59:53 -0800
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: debfoster
Version: 1.99+2.0pre7-2
Severity: normal

root@dragon:/home/joey>debfoster
Would you like to keep liblockfile1? [Y/n/?] No
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  liblockfile1 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 6  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 38.9kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
(Reading database ... 15971 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing liblockfile1 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblockfile1.postrm: dconfig: command not found
dpkg: error processing liblockfile1 (--remove):
 subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 liblockfile1
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
+ exit 100
root@dragon:/home/joey>debfoster
Would you like to keep liblockfile1? [Y/n/?] No

liblockfile1 is broken of course, but debfoster should be able to handle it
better, and not ask me about it over and over.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux dragon 2.4.0 #1 Thu Jan 4 18:43:48 PST 2001 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages debfoster depends on:
ii  libc6          2.2.2-1        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Joey Hess &lt;joey@kitenet.net&gt;</code>:<br>
New Bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Subject: Bug#91735: Acknowledgement (debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove)
Message-ID: <handler.91735.B.98559719619819.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net>
References: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 91735

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 91735@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 08:59:56 +0000
From joey@kitenet.net Mon Mar 26 02:59:56 2001
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [198.144.200.155] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14hSqx-00059S-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 02:59:55 -0600
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dragon.kitenet.net [198.144.200.154])
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BAA7BBC01F; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joey by dragon.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14hSqv-0005g9-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:59:53 -0800
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Subject: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net>
Sender: Joey Hess <joey@dragon.kitenet.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:59:53 -0800
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: debfoster
Version: 1.99+2.0pre7-2
Severity: normal

root@dragon:/home/joey>debfoster
Would you like to keep liblockfile1? [Y/n/?] No
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  liblockfile1 
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 6  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 38.9kB will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
(Reading database ... 15971 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing liblockfile1 ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/liblockfile1.postrm: dconfig: command not found
dpkg: error processing liblockfile1 (--remove):
 subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 liblockfile1
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
+ exit 100
root@dragon:/home/joey>debfoster
Would you like to keep liblockfile1? [Y/n/?] No

liblockfile1 is broken of course, but debfoster should be able to handle it
better, and not ask me about it over and over.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux dragon 2.4.0 #1 Thu Jan 4 18:43:48 PST 2001 i586 unknown

Versions of the packages debfoster depends on:
ii  libc6          2.2.2-1        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone




<strong>Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to wsl@nl.linux.org.</strong>
Request was from <code>Ivo Timmermans &lt;irt@cistron.nl&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2001 11:50:57 +0000
From irt@cistron-office.nl Tue Mar 27 05:50:57 2001
Return-path: <irt@cistron-office.nl>
Received: from 10fwd.cistron-office.nl (smtp.cistron-office.nl) [195.64.65.197] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14hs00-0002iq-00; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 05:50:57 -0600
Received: from subspace.cistron-office.nl ([195.64.65.200])
	by smtp.cistron-office.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14hrzy-0006UQ-00
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:50:54 +0200
Received: (from irt@localhost)
	by subspace.cistron-office.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id NAA31663
	for control@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:50:54 +0200
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:50:54 +0200
From: Ivo Timmermans <irt@cistron.nl>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: forwarded
Message-ID: <20010327135054.C24064@cistron.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

forwarded 86374 alsaplayer-devel@lists.tartarus.org
forwarded 83576 alsaplayer-devel@lists.tartarus.org
forwarded 88964 setlur@bigfoot.com
forwarded 89380 wsl@nl.linux.org
forwarded 91735 wsl@nl.linux.org
forwarded 88320 wsl@nl.linux.org
forwarded 89539 wsl@nl.linux.org
forwarded 91736 wsl@nl.linux.org
thanks


-- 
Ivo Timmermans




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#91735</code>; Package <code>debfoster</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgIvo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#91735: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
Reply-To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>, 91735@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:48:01 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.91735.B91735.10094709627607@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91735
X-Debian-PR-Package: debfoster
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 91735-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91735.10094709627607
          (code B ref 91735); Thu, 27 Dec 2001 16:48:01 GMT
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:35:58 +0100
From: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
To: 91735@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Message-ID: <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net>
X-oi: oi
Delivered-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

Mon Mar 26 02:59:56 2001, Joey Hess wrote:

> liblockfile1 is broken of course, but debfoster should be able to handle it
> better, and not ask me about it over and over.

If you enter `y' at the prompt, debfoster will stop nagging about it and
you will be able to fix the b0rked package at your leisure.
I know it sounds silly, but what else could debfoster do, theoretically
speaking?

Regards,

--
Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>

The cord jumped over and hit the power switch.




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Wessel Dankers &lt;wsl@fruit.eu.org&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
Subject: Bug#91735: Info received (was debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove)
Message-ID: <handler.91735.B91735.10094709627607.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
References: <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91735
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 91735@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 91735) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2001 16:36:02 +0000
From wsl-bounce@fruit.eu.org Thu Dec 27 10:36:02 2001
Return-path: <wsl-bounce@fruit.eu.org>
Received: from 38dyn48.com21.casema.net (fruit.eu.org) [213.17.111.48] (qmailr)
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16JdVi-0001yb-00; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 10:36:02 -0600
Received: (qmail 78622 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2001 16:35:59 -0000
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:35:58 +0100
From: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
To: 91735@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Subject: Re: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
Message-ID: <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net>
X-oi: oi
Delivered-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

Mon Mar 26 02:59:56 2001, Joey Hess wrote:

> liblockfile1 is broken of course, but debfoster should be able to handle it
> better, and not ask me about it over and over.

If you enter `y' at the prompt, debfoster will stop nagging about it and
you will be able to fix the b0rked package at your leisure.
I know it sounds silly, but what else could debfoster do, theoretically
speaking?

Regards,

--
Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>

The cord jumped over and hit the power switch.




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#91735</code>; Package <code>debfoster</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgIvo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#91735: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
Reply-To: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>, 91735@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Original-Sender: Joey Hess <joey@silk.kitenet.net>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:03:03 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.91735.B91735.100947607019115@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91735
X-Debian-PR-Package: debfoster
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 91735-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91735.100947607019115
          (code B ref 91735); Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:03:03 GMT
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:06:37 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
Cc: 91735@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>
References: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net> <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Sender: Joey Hess <joey@silk.kitenet.net>
Delivered-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

Wessel Dankers wrote:
> > liblockfile1 is broken of course, but debfoster should be able to handle it
> > better, and not ask me about it over and over.
> 
> If you enter `y' at the prompt, debfoster will stop nagging about it and
> you will be able to fix the b0rked package at your leisure.
> I know it sounds silly, but what else could debfoster do, theoretically
> speaking?

Right but I might then forget that I don't want it installed, since "fix
at your leisure" probably means "wait some period of time before the bug
I filed on the issue is fixed". Why can't debfoster just remember that I
don't want that installed, and not ask me about it again?

-- 
see shy jo




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Joey Hess &lt;joey@kitenet.net&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Subject: Bug#91735: Info received (was debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove)
Message-ID: <handler.91735.B91735.100947607019115.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>
References: <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91735
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 91735@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 91735) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2001 18:01:10 +0000
From joey@silk.kitenet.net Thu Dec 27 12:01:10 2001
Return-path: <joey@silk.kitenet.net>
Received: from pm3naxs13-149.access.naxs.com (silk.kitenet.net) [216.98.93.149] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16Jeq4-0004yG-00; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:01:09 -0600
Received: from joey by silk.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16JevX-0003Tn-00; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:06:47 -0500
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:06:37 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
Cc: 91735@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
Message-ID: <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>
References: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net> <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Sender: Joey Hess <joey@silk.kitenet.net>
Delivered-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

Wessel Dankers wrote:
> > liblockfile1 is broken of course, but debfoster should be able to handle it
> > better, and not ask me about it over and over.
> 
> If you enter `y' at the prompt, debfoster will stop nagging about it and
> you will be able to fix the b0rked package at your leisure.
> I know it sounds silly, but what else could debfoster do, theoretically
> speaking?

Right but I might then forget that I don't want it installed, since "fix
at your leisure" probably means "wait some period of time before the bug
I filed on the issue is fixed". Why can't debfoster just remember that I
don't want that installed, and not ask me about it again?

-- 
see shy jo




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#91735</code>; Package <code>debfoster</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgIvo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#91735: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
Reply-To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>, 91735@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:33:05 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.91735.B91735.100947784023408@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91735
X-Debian-PR-Package: debfoster
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 91735-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91735.100947784023408
          (code B ref 91735); Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:33:05 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <20011227183036.79374.qmail@miniac.2y.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:29:45 +0100
From: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
To: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Message-ID: <20011227192945.Q45965@fruit.eu.org>
References: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net> <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org> <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>; from joey@kitenet.net on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:06:37PM -0500
X-oi: oi
Resent-From: wsl@fruit.eu.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:30:36 +0100
Resent-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org
Delivered-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

> Right but I might then forget that I don't want it installed, since "fix
> at your leisure" probably means "wait some period of time before the bug
> I filed on the issue is fixed". Why can't debfoster just remember that I
> don't want that installed, and not ask me about it again?

And how does that differ from saying that you do want it and never asking
you again?

--
Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>

only available on a need to know basis




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Wessel Dankers &lt;wsl@fruit.eu.org&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
Subject: Bug#91735: Info received (was debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove)
Message-ID: <handler.91735.B91735.100947784023408.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011227192945.Q45965@fruit.eu.org>
References: <20011227192945.Q45965@fruit.eu.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91735
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 91735@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 91735) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2001 18:30:40 +0000
From wsl-bounce@fruit.eu.org Thu Dec 27 12:30:40 2001
Return-path: <wsl-bounce@fruit.eu.org>
Received: from 38dyn48.com21.casema.net (fruit.eu.org) [213.17.111.48] (qmailr)
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16JfId-00065V-00; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:30:40 -0600
Received: (qmail 79375 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2001 18:30:36 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20011227183036.79374.qmail@miniac.2y.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:29:45 +0100
From: Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>
To: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Subject: Re: debfoster: becomes confused if package fails to remove
Message-ID: <20011227192945.Q45965@fruit.eu.org>
References: <E14hSqv-0005g9-00@dragon.kitenet.net> <20011227173558.P45965@fruit.eu.org> <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20011227180637.GB13120@kitenet.net>; from joey@kitenet.net on Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:06:37PM -0500
X-oi: oi
Resent-From: wsl@fruit.eu.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:30:36 +0100
Resent-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org
Delivered-To: 91735@bugs.debian.org

> Right but I might then forget that I don't want it installed, since "fix
> at your leisure" probably means "wait some period of time before the bug
> I filed on the issue is fixed". Why can't debfoster just remember that I
> don't want that installed, and not ask me about it again?

And how does that differ from saying that you do want it and never asking
you again?

--
Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>

only available on a need to know basis




<strong>Tags added: upstream</strong>
Request was from <code>Ivo Timmermans &lt;ivo@debian.org&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2003 18:52:55 +0000
From ivo@schaapje.org Mon Mar 24 12:52:54 2003
Return-path: <ivo@schaapje.org>
Received: from duvel.xs4all.nl (juarez.schaapje.org) [213.84.36.58] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18xX41-0006mN-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:52:53 -0600
Received: by juarez.schaapje.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EB0D816F; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:52:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:52:51 +0100
From: Ivo Timmermans <ivo@debian.org>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: upstream
Message-ID: <20030324185251.GA15840@juarez>
Reply-To: ivo@debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=4.0
	tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

tags 159349 + upstream
tags 166826 + upstream
tags 109869 + upstream
tags 128819 + upstream
tags 174367 + upstream
tags 186107 + upstream
tags 186108 + upstream
tags 91735 + upstream
thanks

	Ivo

-- 
Norton SystemWorks 2002 includes a file erasure program called Wipe
Info.  In the manual (page 160), we learn that "Wipe Info uses
hexadecimal values to wipe files.  This provides more security than
wiping with decimal values."  - Bruce Schneier




<strong>Changed Bug submitter from Joey Hess &lt;joey@kitenet.net&gt; to Joey Hess &lt;joeyh@debian.org&gt;.</strong>
Request was from <code>Joey Hess &lt;joeyh@debian.org&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2005 03:57:12 +0000
From joey@kitenet.net Wed Jul 27 20:57:12 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1DxzED-0004kO-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:38:38 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dpc6682244174.direcpc.com [66.82.244.174])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4294B17FB6
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 03:38:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B94B86E11C; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:38:25 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: submitter consolidation
Message-ID: <20050728033825.GA30878@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

submitter 15162 !
submitter 21208 !
submitter 20725 !
submitter 30972 !
submitter 39543 !
submitter 44232 !
submitter 55182 !
submitter 58378 !
submitter 64308 !
submitter 71251 !
submitter 76337 !
submitter 80144 !
submitter 25759 !
submitter 271264 !
submitter 138805 !
submitter 179865 !
submitter 225802 !
submitter 295134 !
submitter 226174 !
submitter 226180 !
submitter 226210 !
submitter 226361 !
submitter 226365 !
submitter 288250 !
submitter 140820 !
submitter 20547 !
submitter 24546 !
submitter 27547 !
submitter 50810 !
submitter 29194 !
submitter 45937 !
submitter 50810 !
submitter 27547 !
submitter 52186 !
submitter 78553 !
submitter 78972 !
submitter 140479 !
submitter 225364 !
submitter 225483 !
submitter 226031 !
submitter 18658 !
submitter 20694 !
submitter 46990 !
submitter 61739 !
submitter 67843 !
submitter 68509 !
submitter 76447 !
submitter 58132 !
submitter 84410 !
submitter 91735 !
submitter 139579 !
submitter 93200 !
submitter 15870 !
submitter 15899 !
submitter 139881 !
submitter 86306 !
submitter 91174 !
submitter 91050 !
submitter 91104 !
submitter 202164 !
submitter 225817 !

--=20
see shy jo

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC6FMxd8HHehbQuO8RAvsPAKC0Q4WQdZaYV9eqLSUZPFonel7/ZACg0BWq
KUEpTziXcHkvBkMbAoGNRWM=
=ojgm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--