Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>:
Bug#109032; Package xemacs21-support.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgJames LewisMoss  Subject: Bug#109032: /usr/share/info/xemacs-21.4.4/texinfo.info.gz Reply-To: Akim Demaille , 109032@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Akim Demaille Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: James LewisMoss Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:03:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 109032 X-Debian-PR-Package: xemacs21-support X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by submit@bugs.debian.org id=B.99806376923384 (code B ref -1); Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:03:02 GMT From: Akim Demaille To: Debian Bug Tracking System X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:10 +0200 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: xemacs21-support Version: 21.4.4-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid This file, and I guess many others are polluting my system! Because of it, when I thought I was ready Texinfo 4.0's documentation, I was actually keeping firty old 3.12 problems in my documentations. Please, get rid of this, it has really nothing to do there. In fact, I'm quite frightened when I see all the docs there is there: cl.info-1.gz lispref.info-30.gz texinfo.info-1.gz cl.info-2.gz lispref.info-31.gz texinfo.info-2.gz cl.info-3.gz lispref.info-32.gz texinfo.info-3.gz cl.info-4.gz lispref.info-33.gz texinfo.info-4.gz cl.info-5.gz lispref.info-34.gz texinfo.info-5.gz cl.info-6.gz lispref.info-35.gz texinfo.info-6.gz cl.info.gz lispref.info-36.gz texinfo.info-7.gz custom.info.gz lispref.info-37.gz texinfo.info-8.gz dir.gz lispref.info-38.gz texinfo.info-9.gz emodules.info.gz lispref.info-39.gz texinfo.info.gz external-widget.info.gz lispref.info-3.gz widget.info.gz info.info.gz lispref.info-40.gz xemacs-faq.info-1.gz internals.info-1.gz lispref.info-41.gz xemacs-faq.info-2.gz internals.info-2.gz lispref.info-42.gz xemacs-faq.info-3.gz internals.info-3.gz lispref.info-43.gz xemacs-faq.info-4.gz internals.info-4.gz lispref.info-44.gz xemacs-faq.info-5.gz internals.info-5.gz lispref.info-45.gz xemacs-faq.info-6.gz internals.info-6.gz lispref.info-46.gz xemacs-faq.info.gz internals.info-7.gz lispref.info-47.gz xemacs.info-10.gz internals.info-8.gz lispref.info-48.gz xemacs.info-11.gz internals.info-9.gz lispref.info-4.gz xemacs.info-12.gz internals.info.gz lispref.info-5.gz xemacs.info-13.gz lispref.info-10.gz lispref.info-6.gz xemacs.info-14.gz lispref.info-11.gz lispref.info-7.gz xemacs.info-15.gz lispref.info-12.gz lispref.info-8.gz xemacs.info-16.gz lispref.info-13.gz lispref.info-9.gz xemacs.info-17.gz lispref.info-14.gz lispref.info.gz xemacs.info-18.gz lispref.info-15.gz new-users-guide.info-1.gz xemacs.info-19.gz lispref.info-16.gz new-users-guide.info-2.gz xemacs.info-1.gz lispref.info-17.gz new-users-guide.info-3.gz xemacs.info-20.gz lispref.info-18.gz new-users-guide.info.gz xemacs.info-21.gz lispref.info-19.gz standards.info-1.gz xemacs.info-22.gz lispref.info-1.gz standards.info-2.gz xemacs.info-23.gz lispref.info-20.gz standards.info-3.gz xemacs.info-2.gz lispref.info-21.gz standards.info-4.gz xemacs.info-3.gz lispref.info-22.gz standards.info.gz xemacs.info-4.gz lispref.info-23.gz termcap.info-1.gz xemacs.info-5.gz lispref.info-24.gz termcap.info-2.gz xemacs.info-6.gz lispref.info-25.gz termcap.info-3.gz xemacs.info-7.gz lispref.info-26.gz termcap.info.gz xemacs.info-8.gz lispref.info-27.gz term.info.gz xemacs.info-9.gz lispref.info-28.gz texinfo.info-10.gz xemacs.info.gz lispref.info-29.gz texinfo.info-11.gz lispref.info-2.gz texinfo.info-12.gz I very much doubt the standards, term, termcap etc. have to be there. Thanks! (BTW, I wonder if this could be responsible for all the problems I have currently to get info work... But that might be another story: ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info texinfo nostromo 17:59 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info xemacs nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info mv nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info gcc nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info a2ps nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. and I have the same problems under XEmacs). -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux nostromo 2.2.19 #1 Sat Jul 28 18:31:56 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR Versions of packages xemacs21-support depends on: ii emacsen-common 1.4.13 Common facilities for all emacsen. ii xemacs21 21.4.4-1 Editor and kitchen sink ii xemacs21-mule [xemacs21] 21.4.4-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule bi ii xemacs21-nomule [xemacs21] 21.4.4-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Non-mul   Acknowledgement sent to Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Akim Demaille Subject: Bug#109032: Acknowledgement (/usr/share/info/xemacs-21.4.4/texinfo.info.gz) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 109032 Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): James LewisMoss If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 109032@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to submit@bugs.debian.org). Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2001 15:56:09 +0000 From akim@epita.fr Fri Aug 17 10:56:09 2001 Return-path: Received: from hermes.epita.fr [163.5.255.10] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15Xlyi-000656-00; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:56:08 -0500 Received: from goa.lrde.epita.fr (mail@goa.lrde.epita.fr [10.223.13.2]) by hermes.epita.fr id f7HHsZS26826 for EPITA Paris France Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:54:35 GMT Received: from nostromo.lrde.epita.fr ([10.223.13.52] ident=mail) by goa.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 15Xm48-0003Zl-00 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:44 +0200 Received: from akim by nostromo.lrde.epita.fr with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15Xm3a-00076H-00; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:10 +0200 From: Akim Demaille To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: /usr/share/info/xemacs-21.4.4/texinfo.info.gz X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:10 +0200 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: xemacs21-support Version: 21.4.4-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid This file, and I guess many others are polluting my system! Because of it, when I thought I was ready Texinfo 4.0's documentation, I was actually keeping firty old 3.12 problems in my documentations. Please, get rid of this, it has really nothing to do there. In fact, I'm quite frightened when I see all the docs there is there: cl.info-1.gz lispref.info-30.gz texinfo.info-1.gz cl.info-2.gz lispref.info-31.gz texinfo.info-2.gz cl.info-3.gz lispref.info-32.gz texinfo.info-3.gz cl.info-4.gz lispref.info-33.gz texinfo.info-4.gz cl.info-5.gz lispref.info-34.gz texinfo.info-5.gz cl.info-6.gz lispref.info-35.gz texinfo.info-6.gz cl.info.gz lispref.info-36.gz texinfo.info-7.gz custom.info.gz lispref.info-37.gz texinfo.info-8.gz dir.gz lispref.info-38.gz texinfo.info-9.gz emodules.info.gz lispref.info-39.gz texinfo.info.gz external-widget.info.gz lispref.info-3.gz widget.info.gz info.info.gz lispref.info-40.gz xemacs-faq.info-1.gz internals.info-1.gz lispref.info-41.gz xemacs-faq.info-2.gz internals.info-2.gz lispref.info-42.gz xemacs-faq.info-3.gz internals.info-3.gz lispref.info-43.gz xemacs-faq.info-4.gz internals.info-4.gz lispref.info-44.gz xemacs-faq.info-5.gz internals.info-5.gz lispref.info-45.gz xemacs-faq.info-6.gz internals.info-6.gz lispref.info-46.gz xemacs-faq.info.gz internals.info-7.gz lispref.info-47.gz xemacs.info-10.gz internals.info-8.gz lispref.info-48.gz xemacs.info-11.gz internals.info-9.gz lispref.info-4.gz xemacs.info-12.gz internals.info.gz lispref.info-5.gz xemacs.info-13.gz lispref.info-10.gz lispref.info-6.gz xemacs.info-14.gz lispref.info-11.gz lispref.info-7.gz xemacs.info-15.gz lispref.info-12.gz lispref.info-8.gz xemacs.info-16.gz lispref.info-13.gz lispref.info-9.gz xemacs.info-17.gz lispref.info-14.gz lispref.info.gz xemacs.info-18.gz lispref.info-15.gz new-users-guide.info-1.gz xemacs.info-19.gz lispref.info-16.gz new-users-guide.info-2.gz xemacs.info-1.gz lispref.info-17.gz new-users-guide.info-3.gz xemacs.info-20.gz lispref.info-18.gz new-users-guide.info.gz xemacs.info-21.gz lispref.info-19.gz standards.info-1.gz xemacs.info-22.gz lispref.info-1.gz standards.info-2.gz xemacs.info-23.gz lispref.info-20.gz standards.info-3.gz xemacs.info-2.gz lispref.info-21.gz standards.info-4.gz xemacs.info-3.gz lispref.info-22.gz standards.info.gz xemacs.info-4.gz lispref.info-23.gz termcap.info-1.gz xemacs.info-5.gz lispref.info-24.gz termcap.info-2.gz xemacs.info-6.gz lispref.info-25.gz termcap.info-3.gz xemacs.info-7.gz lispref.info-26.gz termcap.info.gz xemacs.info-8.gz lispref.info-27.gz term.info.gz xemacs.info-9.gz lispref.info-28.gz texinfo.info-10.gz xemacs.info.gz lispref.info-29.gz texinfo.info-11.gz lispref.info-2.gz texinfo.info-12.gz I very much doubt the standards, term, termcap etc. have to be there. Thanks! (BTW, I wonder if this could be responsible for all the problems I have currently to get info work... But that might be another story: ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info texinfo nostromo 17:59 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info xemacs nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info mv nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info gcc nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. ~/src/m4 % LC_ALL=C info a2ps nostromo Err 1 info: Cannot find node `Top'. and I have the same problems under XEmacs). -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux nostromo 2.2.19 #1 Sat Jul 28 18:31:56 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR Versions of packages xemacs21-support depends on: ii emacsen-common 1.4.13 Common facilities for all emacsen. ii xemacs21 21.4.4-1 Editor and kitchen sink ii xemacs21-mule [xemacs21] 21.4.4-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule bi ii xemacs21-nomule [xemacs21] 21.4.4-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Non-mul   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, OHURA Makoto <ohura@debian.org>:
Bug#109032; Package xemacs21-support.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgOHURA Makoto  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#109032: tagging 109032 Reply-To: kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx), 109032@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: OHURA Makoto Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:54:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 109032 X-Debian-PR-Package: xemacs21-support X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid X-Debian-PR-Source: xemacs21 Received: via spool by 109032-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B109032.122115201931256 (code B ref 109032); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:54:06 +0000 Received: (at 109032) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2008 16:53:39 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 53; neutral, 23; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--devscripts, 0.000-+--2.10.35, 0.000-+--21035, 0.000-+--HX-BTS-Version:2.10.35, 0.000-+--H*r:1000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MDO_AUTORESP3 autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from edna.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.58]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KdpQI-00087E-Og; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:53:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 78069E4089; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (d54C3F9E9.access.telenet.be [84.195.249.233]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F736E4072; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BCD1EAB9C; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) To: control@bugs.debian.org Cc: 109032@bugs.debian.org X-BTS-Version: 2.10.35 Message-Id: <20080911165337.5BCD1EAB9C@intrepid.roeckx.be> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) From: kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # nothing specific to sid tags 109032 - sid   Acknowledgement sent to kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx):
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to OHURA Makoto <ohura@debian.org>.   -t  Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) Subject: Bug#109032: Info received (tagging 109032) Message-ID: References: <20080911165337.5BCD1EAB9C@intrepid.roeckx.be> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 109032 X-Debian-PR-Package: xemacs21-support X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid X-Debian-PR-Source: xemacs21 Reply-To: 109032@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): OHURA Makoto If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 109032@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not send mail to owner@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 109032: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D109032 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems   Received: (at 109032) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2008 16:53:39 +0000 From kurt@roeckx.be Thu Sep 11 16:53:39 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 53; neutral, 23; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--devscripts, 0.000-+--2.10.35, 0.000-+--21035, 0.000-+--HX-BTS-Version:2.10.35, 0.000-+--H*r:1000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MDO_AUTORESP3 autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from edna.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.58]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KdpQI-00087E-Og; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:53:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 78069E4089; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (d54C3F9E9.access.telenet.be [84.195.249.233]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F736E4072; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BCD1EAB9C; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: tagging 109032 Cc: 109032@bugs.debian.org X-BTS-Version: 2.10.35 Message-Id: <20080911165337.5BCD1EAB9C@intrepid.roeckx.be> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) From: kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # nothing specific to sid tags 109032 - sid   Tags removed: sid Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2008 16:53:39 +0000 From kurt@roeckx.be Thu Sep 11 16:53:39 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 8; hammy, 53; neutral, 23; spammy, 0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--devscripts, 0.000-+--2.10.35, 0.000-+--21035, 0.000-+--HX-BTS-Version:2.10.35, 0.000-+--H*r:1000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MDO_AUTORESP3 autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from edna.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.58]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KdpQI-00087E-Og; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:53:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 78069E4089; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (d54C3F9E9.access.telenet.be [84.195.249.233]) by edna.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F736E4072; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BCD1EAB9C; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: tagging 109032 Cc: 109032@bugs.debian.org X-BTS-Version: 2.10.35 Message-Id: <20080911165337.5BCD1EAB9C@intrepid.roeckx.be> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:53:37 +0200 (CEST) From: kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # nothing specific to sid tags 109032 - sid