Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 1997 21:21:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 1772 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1997 21:21:06 -0000 Received: from 128.144.80.160 (HELO qwerty.aec.arc.ab.ca) (root@128.144.80.160@128.144.80.160) by 205.229.104.5 with SMTP; 1 Dec 1997 21:21:06 -0000 Received: by qwerty.aec.arc.ab.ca (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0xcdMr-0004kQC; Mon, 1 Dec 97 14:27 MST Message-Id: From: kurtk@aec.arc.ab.ca (kurt klingbeil) Subject: dselect bugs To: submit@bugs.debian.org Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 14:26:56 -0700 (MST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2878 I recently decided to give debian another whirl. Previous attempts at even trying were quickly subverted by a host of problems... Overall, I was impressed by how smoothly the install went, although I wasn't impressed that cfdisk ended up blowing away my hpfs partitions when I configured a 92Meg swapfile in the middle of the disk and mkswap ended up making it 101Meg big thereby tromping on the extended partitions. NBD, I don't use OS2 much anymore anyway, and I should have known to stay away from cfdisk - I've heard of problems with it from various people. Fdisk is where it's at, lean, mean, works every time... Cfdisk looks like it's for DOS dweebs, and certainly isn't bullet proof. Anyway, ignore all that, it's simply a preamble to the _real_ point of this bug report: dselect, namely: Debian Linux `dselect' package handling frontend. Version 1.4.0.8 (i386 elf). Copyright (C) 1994-1996 Ian Jackson. This is - the ':' key does not "unhold" the package - the 'G' key does, though - the 'G' key does not recursively "unhold" any more than one (1) virtual package level i.e. : ---VVVP0--- hitting 'G' here --VVP0--- or here does nothing (though '=' does) -VP1--- hitting 'G' here will unhold Package{0,1,2} Package2 Package1 Package0 -VP0--- hitting 'G' here will unhold Package{0,1} Package1 Package0 --VVP1--- ... the '=', or "hold" does what one would expects at any V-level... - the default setting when running dselect often (not always) seems to be XX_ i.e. "purge" even for packages which I previously selected for installation. Is this what happens when one runs 'dpkg --audit' ? It seems to happen only for packages which were not already installed. I would sort of expect the default to be to just leave packages alone. If one wants to purge or auto-upgrade them, that would require intentional finger fiddling. - I had a situation where I was running out of space on a partition and thought I could suspend dselect (and children) until I freed up some space. In that case, hitting '^Z' popped me to a login: prompt. Dselect/dpkg continued running in the background... - if the ftp connection attempt fails, dselect dumbly continues on asking whether one wants to install (and then delete) the newly (_not_) downloaded files. It would be better to just bail out at that point and go back to the menu, or correcter still to just retry the ftp connection, until a '^C' is hit. After pounding on dselect several times, I ended up getting the result I wanted, but I thought I'd pass on some feedback on some of the first- impression forming nits I encountered. A few people told me "Don't do it. Just use RedHat." I'm philosophically aligned your way and will give it a serious try. ttfn, kk