Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: segfaults Reply-To: Wichert Akkerman , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Wichert Akkerman Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:48:27 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.9791483357800 (code B ref -1); Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:48:27 GMT Message-Id: <200101100801.f0A81wL07841@fog.mors.wiggy.net> From: Wichert Akkerman To: Debian Bug Tracking System X-Reportbug-Version: 1.9 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.9 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:01:57 -0800 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: apt Version: 0.3.19 Severity: grave [fog;~]-1# apt-get install ntp Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... 0% zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) apt-get install ntp [fog;~]-2# gdb /usr/bin/apt-get core GNU gdb 5.0 Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"... (no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `apt-get install ntp'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #0 0x4006a8af in pkgDepCache::Init () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 (gdb) bt #0 0x4006a8af in pkgDepCache::Init () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #1 0x4006a405 in pkgDepCache::pkgDepCache () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #2 0x400a3299 in pkgCacheFile::Open () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #3 0x805483c in strcpy () #4 0x40053cea in CommandLine::DispatchArg () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #5 0x805e0fc in strcpy () #6 0x4014cdbc in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux fog 2.2.18ext3 #1 Tue Dec 26 01:06:30 CET 2000 i686 Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.2-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libstdc++2.10 1:2.95.2-14 The GNU stdc++ library   Acknowledgement sent to Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Wichert Akkerman Subject: Bug#81829: Acknowledgement (segfaults) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200101100801.f0A81wL07841@fog.mors.wiggy.net> References: <200101100801.f0A81wL07841@fog.mors.wiggy.net> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 81829 Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to bugs@bugs.debian.org). Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2001 17:38:55 +0000 From wichert@cistron.nl Wed Jan 10 11:38:54 2001 Return-path: Received: from nat-hdqt.valinux.com (fog.mors.wiggy.net) [198.186.202.17] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14GPD4-00021k-00; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:38:54 -0600 Received: (from wichert@localhost) by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.11.1/8.11.1/Debian 8.11.0-6) id f0A81wL07841; Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:01:58 -0800 Message-Id: <200101100801.f0A81wL07841@fog.mors.wiggy.net> From: Wichert Akkerman To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: segfaults X-Reportbug-Version: 1.9 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.9 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:01:57 -0800 Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: apt Version: 0.3.19 Severity: grave [fog;~]-1# apt-get install ntp Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... 0% zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) apt-get install ntp [fog;~]-2# gdb /usr/bin/apt-get core GNU gdb 5.0 Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-linux-gnu"... (no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `apt-get install ntp'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #0 0x4006a8af in pkgDepCache::Init () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 (gdb) bt #0 0x4006a8af in pkgDepCache::Init () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #1 0x4006a405 in pkgDepCache::pkgDepCache () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #2 0x400a3299 in pkgCacheFile::Open () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #3 0x805483c in strcpy () #4 0x40053cea in CommandLine::DispatchArg () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg.so.2.7 #5 0x805e0fc in strcpy () #6 0x4014cdbc in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux fog 2.2.18ext3 #1 Tue Dec 26 01:06:30 CET 2000 i686 Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.2-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libstdc++2.10 1:2.95.2-14 The GNU stdc++ library   Severity set to `normal'. Request was from Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2001 13:29:25 +0000 From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Sun Feb 04 07:29:25 2001 Return-path: Received: from azure.humbug.org.au [::ffff:203.24.22.40] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14PPEK-0006da-00; Sun, 04 Feb 2001 07:29:25 -0600 Received: from dhcp65.localnet (blae) [192.168.105.65] by azure.humbug.org.au with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14PPEF-0004FA-00; Sun, 04 Feb 2001 23:29:19 +1000 Received: from aj by blae with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14PPED-00077X-00 for ; Sun, 04 Feb 2001 13:29:17 +0000 To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: downgrade Message-Id: From: Anthony Towns Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 13:29:17 +0000 Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org severity 81829 normal   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Reply-To: Adrian Bunk , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Adrian Bunk Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:18:01 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 81829-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.98223577220435 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:18:01 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:16:12 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: To: Anthony Towns cc: <81829@bugs.debian.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Hi Anthony, I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. cu, Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.   Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 81829 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 11:16:12 +0000 From bunk@fs.tum.de Thu Feb 15 05:16:12 2001 Return-path: Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [::ffff:129.187.176.79] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TMOR-0005JV-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:16:11 -0600 Received: (qmail 803 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 11:16:09 -0000 Received: from tethys.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.24) by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 11:16:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:16:12 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: To: Anthony Towns cc: <81829@bugs.debian.org> Subject: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Hi Anthony, I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. cu, Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Reply-To: Anthony Towns , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Anthony Towns Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:53:27 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 81829-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.98224160022242 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:53:27 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:53:11 +1000 From: Anthony Towns To: Adrian Bunk Cc: 81829@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20010215225311.B7170@azure.humbug.org.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:16:12PM +0100 Organisation: Lacking X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:16:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to > "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same > problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it > isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. grave bugs mean a package is unusable for everyone, and that it thus won't be a loss to anyone if the package is removed. apt works fine for me, so that's obviously not the case. A segfault on its own that doesn't reoccur is just a normal bug, and that's all there was any evidence of that I saw. If it's reoccuring and happens no matter what, that ups it to important, but not grave. Cheers, aj --=20 Anthony Towns I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net) --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBOovRN+RRvX9xctrtAQEIbAP9EILdd0KkvIgGBt8CgZ+ar5qo1R4E8BRh rYlZO8gT3Vkp8k9q+3iulQTc8L2V22vZswEZV2Saq0BoOGbAl+FIAL9Bud6qKnPv JU+XMx1UtNJvgcaijz342auz3vZff4vRnEu0ZVKhe16yCL7O4nGRGpT6vM1xwFpF P5b+YZVJkoY= =fbYC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl--   Acknowledgement sent to Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Anthony Towns Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20010215225311.B7170@azure.humbug.org.au> References: <20010215225311.B7170@azure.humbug.org.au> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 81829 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 12:53:20 +0000 From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Thu Feb 15 06:53:20 2001 Return-path: Received: from azure.humbug.org.au [::ffff:203.24.22.40] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TNuQ-0005mA-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 06:53:20 -0600 Received: from aj by azure.humbug.org.au with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14TNuJ-0002Ts-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:53:11 +1000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:53:11 +1000 From: Anthony Towns To: Adrian Bunk Cc: 81829@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Message-ID: <20010215225311.B7170@azure.humbug.org.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:16:12PM +0100 Organisation: Lacking X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:16:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to > "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same > problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it > isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. grave bugs mean a package is unusable for everyone, and that it thus won't be a loss to anyone if the package is removed. apt works fine for me, so that's obviously not the case. A segfault on its own that doesn't reoccur is just a normal bug, and that's all there was any evidence of that I saw. If it's reoccuring and happens no matter what, that ups it to important, but not grave. Cheers, aj --=20 Anthony Towns I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net) --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBOovRN+RRvX9xctrtAQEIbAP9EILdd0KkvIgGBt8CgZ+ar5qo1R4E8BRh rYlZO8gT3Vkp8k9q+3iulQTc8L2V22vZswEZV2Saq0BoOGbAl+FIAL9Bud6qKnPv JU+XMx1UtNJvgcaijz342auz3vZff4vRnEu0ZVKhe16yCL7O4nGRGpT6vM1xwFpF P5b+YZVJkoY= =fbYC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oLBj+sq0vYjzfsbl--   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Reply-To: Jason Gunthorpe , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Jason Gunthorpe Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:18:17 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 81829-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.98227157520983 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:18:17 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:12:47 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk , 81829@bugs.debian.org cc: Anthony Towns , debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to > "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same > problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it > isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. Their are only 2 known cases where this happens: 1) Your libc/libstdc++ is screwed 2) Your system has corrupted the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin In #1 you have to fix it, in #2 it usually fixes itself next 'update', but if that is not the case 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin' always fixes it. Nobody has been able to show that these are actual APT bugs, the reason I have not closed the reports is because I would like it to handle #2 more elegantly and make a better error message. Jason   Acknowledgement sent to Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 81829 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 21:12:55 +0000 From jgg@debian.org Thu Feb 15 15:12:54 2001 Return-path: Received: from cast-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.34] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TVhu-0005SI-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:12:54 -0600 Received: (qmail 7045 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender ) by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Feb 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg) by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14TVho-0003C8-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:12:48 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:12:47 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk , 81829@bugs.debian.org cc: Anthony Towns , debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to > "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same > problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it > isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. Their are only 2 known cases where this happens: 1) Your libc/libstdc++ is screwed 2) Your system has corrupted the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin In #1 you have to fix it, in #2 it usually fixes itself next 'update', but if that is not the case 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin' always fixes it. Nobody has been able to show that these are actual APT bugs, the reason I have not closed the reports is because I would like it to handle #2 more elegantly and make a better error message. Jason   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Reply-To: Adrian Bunk , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Adrian Bunk Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:48:01 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 81829-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.98227339129668 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:48:01 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:43:10 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: To: Jason Gunthorpe cc: <81829@bugs.debian.org>, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Their are only 2 known cases where this happens: > 1) Your libc/libstdc++ is screwed > 2) Your system has corrupted the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin > > In #1 you have to fix it, in #2 it usually fixes itself next 'update', but > if that is not the case 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin' always fixes it. It seems #2 was the case but the next 'update' didn't fix it. I did a 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' that fixed the problem for me (I didn't try a 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin'). > Nobody has been able to show that these are actual APT bugs, the reason I > have not closed the reports is because I would like it to handle #2 more > elegantly and make a better error message. That would be good because I can't remember doing anything wrong before and it took me some time to find the right solution. An advisory which files to delete would have saved me some time (and a segmentation fault is a bad error handling of a program so I would call it a bug). > Jason cu, Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.   Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 81829 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 21:43:11 +0000 From bunk@fs.tum.de Thu Feb 15 15:43:11 2001 Return-path: Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [::ffff:129.187.176.79] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TWBC-0007hv-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:43:11 -0600 Received: (qmail 25063 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 21:43:05 -0000 Received: from tethys.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.24) by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 21:43:05 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:43:10 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: To: Jason Gunthorpe cc: <81829@bugs.debian.org>, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Their are only 2 known cases where this happens: > 1) Your libc/libstdc++ is screwed > 2) Your system has corrupted the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin > > In #1 you have to fix it, in #2 it usually fixes itself next 'update', but > if that is not the case 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin' always fixes it. It seems #2 was the case but the next 'update' didn't fix it. I did a 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' that fixed the problem for me (I didn't try a 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin'). > Nobody has been able to show that these are actual APT bugs, the reason I > have not closed the reports is because I would like it to handle #2 more > elegantly and make a better error message. That would be good because I can't remember doing anything wrong before and it took me some time to find the right solution. An advisory which files to delete would have saved me some time (and a segmentation fault is a bad error handling of a program so I would call it a bug). > Jason cu, Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Reply-To: Jason Gunthorpe , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Jason Gunthorpe Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:48:05 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 81829-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.98227354930099 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:48:05 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:45:36 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk cc: 81829@bugs.debian.org, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > It seems #2 was the case but the next 'update' didn't fix it. I did a > 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' that fixed the problem for me (I didn't > try a 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin'). Uh. I did not say to do rm /var/cache/apt/archives. That cannot, and must not fix the problem that Wichert reported. For 'update' to fix it there must be something updated. Jason   Acknowledgement sent to Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 81829 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 21:45:49 +0000 From jgg@debian.org Thu Feb 15 15:45:49 2001 Return-path: Received: from ike-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.35] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TWDl-0007p7-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:45:49 -0600 Received: (qmail 10869 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 21:45:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender ) by ike-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Feb 2001 21:45:41 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg) by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14TWDZ-0003Dr-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:45:37 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:45:36 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk cc: 81829@bugs.debian.org, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > It seems #2 was the case but the next 'update' didn't fix it. I did a > 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' that fixed the problem for me (I didn't > try a 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin'). Uh. I did not say to do rm /var/cache/apt/archives. That cannot, and must not fix the problem that Wichert reported. For 'update' to fix it there must be something updated. Jason   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Reply-To: Adrian Bunk , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Adrian Bunk Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:06:14 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 81829-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.98227424732541 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:06:14 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:57:30 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: To: Jason Gunthorpe cc: <81829@bugs.debian.org>, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > It seems #2 was the case but the next 'update' didn't fix it. I did a > > 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' that fixed the problem for me (I didn't > > try a 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin'). > > Uh. > > I did not say to do rm /var/cache/apt/archives. That cannot, and must not > fix the problem that Wichert reported. > > For 'update' to fix it there must be something updated. I was a bit unclear: I did a 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' followed by an 'update'. Before there was nothing new for 'update' but now there was. I used perhaps an unusual way to update the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin ? > Jason cu, Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.   Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 81829 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 21:57:27 +0000 From bunk@fs.tum.de Thu Feb 15 15:57:27 2001 Return-path: Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [::ffff:129.187.176.79] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TWP0-0008Sk-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:57:26 -0600 Received: (qmail 25390 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 21:57:25 -0000 Received: from tethys.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.24) by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 21:57:25 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:57:30 +0100 (CET) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: To: Jason Gunthorpe cc: <81829@bugs.debian.org>, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > It seems #2 was the case but the next 'update' didn't fix it. I did a > > 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' that fixed the problem for me (I didn't > > try a 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin'). > > Uh. > > I did not say to do rm /var/cache/apt/archives. That cannot, and must not > fix the problem that Wichert reported. > > For 'update' to fix it there must be something updated. I was a bit unclear: I did a 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' followed by an 'update'. Before there was nothing new for 'update' but now there was. I used perhaps an unusual way to update the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin ? > Jason cu, Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  Subject: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? Reply-To: Jason Gunthorpe , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Jason Gunthorpe Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:33:11 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 81829-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.98227922429747 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:33:11 GMT Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:16:05 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk cc: 81829@bugs.debian.org, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I was a bit unclear: I did a 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' followed by an > 'update'. Before there was nothing new for 'update' but now there was. I The 'now there was' is just due to usual Package file updation. Jason   Acknowledgement sent to Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 81829 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 23:20:24 +0000 From jgg@debian.org Thu Feb 15 17:20:24 2001 Return-path: Received: from ike-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.35] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TXhD-0007ja-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:20:24 -0600 Received: (qmail 6987 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 23:08:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender ) by ike-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Feb 2001 23:08:27 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg) by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14TWmH-0003F9-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:21:30 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:16:05 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk cc: 81829@bugs.debian.org, Anthony Towns , APT Development Team Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I was a bit unclear: I did a 'rm /var/cache/apt/archives/*' followed by an > 'update'. Before there was nothing new for 'update' but now there was. I The 'now there was' is just due to usual Package file updation. Jason   Merged 81829 93453. Request was from Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2001 04:49:31 +0000 From jgg@debian.org Mon Apr 09 23:49:31 2001 Return-path: Received: from cast-ext.ab.videon.ca [206.75.216.34] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14mq5r-00055J-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:49:31 -0500 Received: (qmail 13993 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 04:49:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender ) by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Apr 2001 04:49:30 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg) by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14mq5m-0001Kl-00 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:49:26 -0600 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:49:25 -0600 (MDT) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: control@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org merge 93453 81829 severity 81829 wishlist   Severity set to `wishlist'. Request was from Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2001 04:49:31 +0000 From jgg@debian.org Mon Apr 09 23:49:31 2001 Return-path: Received: from cast-ext.ab.videon.ca [206.75.216.34] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14mq5r-00055J-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 23:49:31 -0500 Received: (qmail 13993 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 04:49:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63]) (envelope-sender ) by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Apr 2001 04:49:30 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg) by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14mq5m-0001Kl-00 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:49:26 -0600 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:49:25 -0600 (MDT) From: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: control@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org merge 93453 81829 severity 81829 wishlist   Severity set to `normal'. Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2003 04:29:00 +0000 From mdz@csh.rit.edu Fri Jun 06 23:28:59 2003 Return-path: Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19OVK7-0003Td-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 23:28:59 -0500 Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 19OVK7-0003Mo-00 for control@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 00:28:59 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19OVK6-00012O-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 00:28:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:28:58 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: merge Message-ID: <20030607042858.GK31465@alcor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) severity 81829 normal merge 81829 186366 thanks -- - mdz   Merged 81829 93453 98017 165448 166306 171248 173616 177604 177871 186366. Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2003 04:29:00 +0000 From mdz@csh.rit.edu Fri Jun 06 23:28:59 2003 Return-path: Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19OVK7-0003Td-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 23:28:59 -0500 Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 19OVK7-0003Mo-00 for control@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 00:28:59 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19OVK6-00012O-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jun 2003 00:28:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:28:58 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: merge Message-ID: <20030607042858.GK31465@alcor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) severity 81829 normal merge 81829 186366 thanks -- - mdz   Changed Bug title. Request was from Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2003 15:20:07 +0000 From jdthood@yahoo.co.uk Sun Jul 06 10:20:05 2003 Return-path: Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ZBJ7-0003sB-00; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 10:20:05 -0500 Received: (qmail 25858 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 15:20:04 -0000 Received: from 81-91-5-95-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos.localdomain) (81.91.5.95) by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 15:20:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thanatos.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D3E10D62E for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2003 17:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: apt bug tidying From: Thomas Hood To: control@bugs.debian.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1057504803.2667.1128.camel@thanatos> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 06 Jul 2003 17:20:04 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) merge 200102 197840 severity 195014 minor merge 195014 79277 retitle 81829 apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 97924 apt-get segfaults with a long sources.list thanks   Changed Bug title. Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jul 2003 03:15:57 +0000 From mdz@csh.rit.edu Tue Jul 22 22:15:55 2003 Return-path: Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19fA6d-000276-00; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:15:55 -0500 Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 19fA6b-0003kK-00 for control@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:15:55 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19fA6U-0008Cs-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:15:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:15:46 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: bug reorg Message-ID: <20030723031546.GH15582@alcor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) retitle 81829 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 93453 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 98017 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 165448 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 166306 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 171248 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 173616 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 177604 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 177871 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin retitle 186366 [libapt-pkg] apt-get segfaults on corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin severity 192228 normal merge 92193 192228 retitle 92193 [dpkgpm] infinite loop reading stdin retitle 197828 [dpkgpm] apt: uses all of cpu waiting for disk retitle 192228 [dpkgpm] infinite loop reading stdin retitle 119509 [apt-get] install and update should be mutually exclusive retitle 194467 [apt-get] install and update should be mutually exclusive retitle 137433 [policy] apt: -t option fails to give warning when ignoring you retitle 137560 [apt-get] build-dep does not remove conflicting packages to satisfy dependencies (should it?) retitle 152711 [methods/http] apt has problems with chunked encoding or publicfile? retitle 172339 [dpkgpm] apt feeds packages with circular deps to dpkg problematically retitle 22550 [dpkgpm] apt-get upgrade could configure packages earlier retitle 190558 [dpkgpm] many packages may be unconfigured after apt-get retitle 174945 [tagfile] apt: installing package with lots of conffiles breaks apt (field larger than 32k) retitle 175034 [methods/ftp] apt/dpkg ipv6 ftp problem (EPTR) retitle 177952 [policy] apt-get dist-upgrade with Pin-Priority of woody>sarge replaces woody's *utils with sarge's coreutils retitle 191309 [methods/http] apt: non-blocking error with http method on nfs root retitle 198730 [methods/cdrom] cdroms.list created by 0.3.19 not recognized/converted properly retitle 200953 [i18n] apt-get questions are broken on ru_RU.KOI8-R locale severity 202493 minor retitle 202493 [apt-cache] apt-cache show prints nothing and exits successfully thanks -- - mdz   Merged 81829 93453 98017 165448 166306 171248 173616 177604 177871 186366 211769. Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2003 01:38:27 +0000 From mdz@csh.rit.edu Fri Sep 19 20:38:25 2003 Return-path: Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A0Wha-0005tF-00; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:38:22 -0500 Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1A0Whe-0000FB-00 for control@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:38:26 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1A0WhZ-0000ta-00 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:38:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:38:21 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#211769: "apt-cache search ldaps" segfaults Message-ID: <20030920013821.GD1469@alcor.net> References: <3F6B9FCB.1474EE24@thalassocracy.org> <20030920011216.GB1469@alcor.net> <3F6BAED5.3C1951D4@thalassocracy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F6BAED5.3C1951D4@thalassocracy.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) merge 211769 81829 thanks On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:35:17PM -0700, Steven Hazel wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Try "rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin". > > This worked. Thanks! -- - mdz   Merged 81829 93453 98017 165448 166306 171248 173616 177604 177871 186366 211769 216249. Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2003 15:52:51 +0000 From mdz@csh.rit.edu Fri Oct 17 10:52:47 2003 Return-path: Received: from blacksheep.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AAWuD-0002Je-00; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:52:45 -0500 Received: from dijkstra (dijkstra.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.152]) by blacksheep.csh.rit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12794290; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:52:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mdz by dijkstra with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AAWuC-0001jC-00; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:52:44 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:52:44 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman To: "Jens Thiele (karme)" , 216249@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#216249: apt utils segfault Message-ID: <20031017155244.GF6350@dijkstra.csh.rit.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) merge 216249 81829 thanks On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:24:49PM +0200, Jens Thiele (karme) wrote: > Reading Package Lists... Error! > E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room > E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room > E: Error occured while processing netstd (NewVersion1) > E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/dpkg/status > E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. > (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... > Program exited with code 0144. This is #166758, which is long fixed. > and both: > deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free > deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free > > give me a segfault: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x400a2270 in pkgCacheGenerator::ListParser::NewDepends () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2.so.3.2 This looks like #81829. Delete /var/cache/apt/*.bin and re-run apt-get update to verify. -- - mdz   Merged 81829 93453 98017 165448 166306 171248 173616 177604 177871 186366 211769 216249 218917. Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 16:29:57 +0000 From mdz@csh.rit.edu Mon Nov 03 10:29:56 2003 Return-path: Received: from blacksheep.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AGhaW-0002ms-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 10:29:56 -0600 Received: from dijkstra (dijkstra.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.152]) by blacksheep.csh.rit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1198BC; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:29:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mdz by dijkstra with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGhaV-0004DL-00; Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:29:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:29:55 -0500 From: Matt Zimmerman To: Helge Kreutzmann , 218917@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#218917: apt: Apt dies with a memory corruption error Message-ID: <20031103162955.GJ9377@dijkstra.csh.rit.edu> References: <20031103110932.GA8081@itp.uni-hannover.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031103110932.GA8081@itp.uni-hannover.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_3 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) merge 218917 81829 thanks On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 12:09:32PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Now for the second time, apt-get dies with > Reading Package Lists... Done > Speicherzugriffsfehleree... 78% > > irregardless of the command issued (e.g. dist-upgrade, clean, ..). > (Sorry, I tried changing the german error message to C, but failed, > even and env LC_MESSAGES=C did not help, it means "memory acess > error"). Please check the bug tracking system before filing new bugs; this bug has already been reported many times. -- - mdz   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#81829: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files Reply-To: Bob the Hamster , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Bob the Hamster Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:03:02 UTC Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid Received: via spool by 81829-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.108141059528942 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 08 Apr 2004 08:03:02 UTC Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 07:49:55 +0000 Received: from brionne.cyberverse.com [209.151.224.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BBUIM-0007Wd-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:49:54 -0700 Received: (qmail 10462 invoked by uid 763); 8 Apr 2004 07:49:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:49:54 -0700 From: Bob the Hamster To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 I was running an update of my debian/sarge box today, and encountered the following error message at the [I]nstall step in dselect. Reading Package Lists... Done /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/install: line 57: 15737 Segmentation fault $APTGET $OPTS "$APT_OPT0" "$APT_OPT1" dselect-upgrade I searched for the error message on google groups, and found a few complaints about it, but most had no reply at all, and the few that did have replies were totally unhelpful. I did find Debian bug 196070 which was marked fixed in July of last year with no useful information posted in the bug report, other than the clarification that the crash was being caused by apt, not by dselect. So I cut dselect out of the loop, and tried apt-get from the command-line. [root:~]apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Segmentation faulty Tree... 50% The "Segmentation Fault" error was being drawn over the top of the last line of text. "apt-get clean" did nothing, and "apt-get check" segfaulted the same way as "apt-get upgrade". "apt-get update" seemed to download the package lists just fine, but then "apt-get upgrade" would still crash. But the error message "Segmentation faulty" was cute, and more clear and concise than the error I was getting by way of dselect, so I searched google groups for "Segmentation faulty" and that got some more useful posts. One suggested deleting /var/cache/apt/*.bin [root:~]ls -l /var/cache/apt/*.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4973681 Apr 7 15:55 /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 /var/cache/apt/srcpkgcache.bin [root:~]mkdir bak [root:~]mkdir bak/var [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt/bin [root:~]mv /var/cache/apt/*.bin ~/bak/var/cache/apt/bin And after that, everything was happy again. I was able to run "apt-cache update" and then "apt-cache upgrade" and everything worked. Afterwards, knowing the problem, a search of the debian bug archives turned up Bug 81829 and many duplicates. I read all the duplicates, and they were all the same story. Somebody reports segfaults in apt-get. A developer is unable to reproduce the error, and suggests to the reporter, "hey, I'll bet your apt cache got corrupted somehow" and advises the reporter to run "rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin" ... Only one reporter bothered to save the corrupt bin files, and then he deleted them before anybody asked for them. But I still have mine, and can consistenly reproduce the segmentation fault on demand: [root:~]cp -p ~/bak/var/cache/apt/*.bin /var/cache/apt/ [root:~]ls -l /var/cache/apt/ total 9660 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 8192 Apr 7 16:12 archives -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4973681 Apr 7 15:55 pkgcache.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 srcpkgcache.bin [root:~]apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Segmentation faulty Tree... 65% So. Anybody want my corrupt /var/cache/apt/.bin files? I am eager to do whatever I can to assist in resolving this lil' bug once and for all. --- James Paige   Acknowledgement sent to Bob the Hamster <Bob@HamsterRepublic.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Bob the Hamster Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> References: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 07:49:55 +0000 From spam@cyberverse.com Thu Apr 08 00:49:55 2004 Return-path: Received: from brionne.cyberverse.com [209.151.224.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BBUIM-0007Wd-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:49:54 -0700 Received: (qmail 10462 invoked by uid 763); 8 Apr 2004 07:49:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:49:54 -0700 From: Bob the Hamster To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Subject: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files Message-ID: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 I was running an update of my debian/sarge box today, and encountered the following error message at the [I]nstall step in dselect. Reading Package Lists... Done /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/install: line 57: 15737 Segmentation fault $APTGET $OPTS "$APT_OPT0" "$APT_OPT1" dselect-upgrade I searched for the error message on google groups, and found a few complaints about it, but most had no reply at all, and the few that did have replies were totally unhelpful. I did find Debian bug 196070 which was marked fixed in July of last year with no useful information posted in the bug report, other than the clarification that the crash was being caused by apt, not by dselect. So I cut dselect out of the loop, and tried apt-get from the command-line. [root:~]apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Segmentation faulty Tree... 50% The "Segmentation Fault" error was being drawn over the top of the last line of text. "apt-get clean" did nothing, and "apt-get check" segfaulted the same way as "apt-get upgrade". "apt-get update" seemed to download the package lists just fine, but then "apt-get upgrade" would still crash. But the error message "Segmentation faulty" was cute, and more clear and concise than the error I was getting by way of dselect, so I searched google groups for "Segmentation faulty" and that got some more useful posts. One suggested deleting /var/cache/apt/*.bin [root:~]ls -l /var/cache/apt/*.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4973681 Apr 7 15:55 /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 /var/cache/apt/srcpkgcache.bin [root:~]mkdir bak [root:~]mkdir bak/var [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt/bin [root:~]mv /var/cache/apt/*.bin ~/bak/var/cache/apt/bin And after that, everything was happy again. I was able to run "apt-cache update" and then "apt-cache upgrade" and everything worked. Afterwards, knowing the problem, a search of the debian bug archives turned up Bug 81829 and many duplicates. I read all the duplicates, and they were all the same story. Somebody reports segfaults in apt-get. A developer is unable to reproduce the error, and suggests to the reporter, "hey, I'll bet your apt cache got corrupted somehow" and advises the reporter to run "rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin" ... Only one reporter bothered to save the corrupt bin files, and then he deleted them before anybody asked for them. But I still have mine, and can consistenly reproduce the segmentation fault on demand: [root:~]cp -p ~/bak/var/cache/apt/*.bin /var/cache/apt/ [root:~]ls -l /var/cache/apt/ total 9660 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 8192 Apr 7 16:12 archives -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4973681 Apr 7 15:55 pkgcache.bin -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 srcpkgcache.bin [root:~]apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Segmentation faulty Tree... 65% So. Anybody want my corrupt /var/cache/apt/.bin files? I am eager to do whatever I can to assist in resolving this lil' bug once and for all. --- James Paige   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#81829: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files Reply-To: Matt Zimmerman , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Matt Zimmerman Original-Sender: Matt Zimmerman Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:18:09 UTC Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid Received: via spool by 81829-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.108144046613019 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 08 Apr 2004 16:18:09 UTC Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 16:07:46 +0000 Received: from mta8.adelphia.net [68.168.78.196] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BBc4A-0003Lz-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:07:46 -0700 Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.1]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040408160412.PPBH8065.mta10.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:04:12 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BBc0c-0002im-RP; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:04:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:04:06 -0700 From: Matt Zimmerman To: Bob the Hamster , 81829@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> References: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:49:54AM -0700, Bob the Hamster wrote: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 srcpkgcache.bin > [root:~]apt-get upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Segmentation faulty Tree... 65% > > So. Anybody want my corrupt /var/cache/apt/.bin files? I am eager to do > whatever I can to assist in resolving this lil' bug once and for all. What filesystem are you using? This corruption is not believed to be apt's fault presently. -- - mdz   Acknowledgement sent to Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Matt Zimmerman Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bug#81829: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> References: <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2004 16:07:46 +0000 From mdz@alcor.net Thu Apr 08 09:07:46 2004 Return-path: Received: from mta8.adelphia.net [68.168.78.196] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BBc4A-0003Lz-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:07:46 -0700 Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.1]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040408160412.PPBH8065.mta10.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net>; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 12:04:12 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 4.31) id 1BBc0c-0002im-RP; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 09:04:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:04:06 -0700 From: Matt Zimmerman To: Bob the Hamster , 81829@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#81829: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files Message-ID: <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> References: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:49:54AM -0700, Bob the Hamster wrote: > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 srcpkgcache.bin > [root:~]apt-get upgrade > Reading Package Lists... Done > Segmentation faulty Tree... 65% > > So. Anybody want my corrupt /var/cache/apt/.bin files? I am eager to do > whatever I can to assist in resolving this lil' bug once and for all. What filesystem are you using? This corruption is not believed to be apt's fault presently. -- - mdz   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#81829: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files Reply-To: Bob the Hamster , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Bob the Hamster Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:48:04 UTC Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid Received: via spool by 81829-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.10814745564335 (code B ref 81829); Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:48:04 UTC Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2004 01:35:56 +0000 Received: from brionne.cyberverse.com [209.151.224.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BBkw0-000175-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:35:56 -0700 Received: (qmail 21747 invoked by uid 763); 9 Apr 2004 01:35:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:35:55 -0700 From: Bob the Hamster To: Matt Zimmerman , 81829@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20040409013555.GA21705@brionne.cyberverse.com> References: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:04:06AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:49:54AM -0700, Bob the Hamster wrote: > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 srcpkgcache.bin > > [root:~]apt-get upgrade > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Segmentation faulty Tree... 65% > > > > So. Anybody want my corrupt /var/cache/apt/.bin files? I am eager to do > > whatever I can to assist in resolving this lil' bug once and for all. > > What filesystem are you using? This corruption is not believed to be apt's > fault presently. > > -- > - mdz I am using plain-ol' EXT3 I would agree with the guess that the corruption was probably not apt's fault, but the real issue in this bug is what apt does after [insert random cause of corruption] when it tries to parse the corrupt file. An error-checking thing, ya know? -- James Paige   Acknowledgement sent to Bob the Hamster <Bob@HamsterRepublic.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Bob the Hamster Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bug#81829: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040409013555.GA21705@brionne.cyberverse.com> References: <20040409013555.GA21705@brionne.cyberverse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2004 01:35:56 +0000 From spam@cyberverse.com Thu Apr 08 18:35:56 2004 Return-path: Received: from brionne.cyberverse.com [209.151.224.34] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BBkw0-000175-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:35:56 -0700 Received: (qmail 21747 invoked by uid 763); 9 Apr 2004 01:35:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 18:35:55 -0700 From: Bob the Hamster To: Matt Zimmerman , 81829@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#81829: corrupt /var/cache/apt/*.bin files Message-ID: <20040409013555.GA21705@brionne.cyberverse.com> References: <20040408074954.GA10139@brionne.cyberverse.com> <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040408160406.GC10062@alcor.net> Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:04:06AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:49:54AM -0700, Bob the Hamster wrote: > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4882303 Apr 7 15:08 srcpkgcache.bin > > [root:~]apt-get upgrade > > Reading Package Lists... Done > > Segmentation faulty Tree... 65% > > > > So. Anybody want my corrupt /var/cache/apt/.bin files? I am eager to do > > whatever I can to assist in resolving this lil' bug once and for all. > > What filesystem are you using? This corruption is not believed to be apt's > fault presently. > > -- > - mdz I am using plain-ol' EXT3 I would agree with the guess that the corruption was probably not apt's fault, but the real issue in this bug is what apt does after [insert random cause of corruption] when it tries to parse the corrupt file. An error-checking thing, ya know? -- James Paige   Tags removed: sid Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 03:19:32 +0000 From mdz@alcor.net Tue May 04 20:19:32 2004 Return-path: Received: from mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BLCwW-0003Nc-00; Tue, 04 May 2004 20:19:32 -0700 Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.207]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040505031902.EZNT8065.mta10.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net> for ; Tue, 4 May 2004 23:19:02 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BLCw1-0008H6-Ad for control@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 20:19:01 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 20:19:01 -0700 From: Matt Zimmerman To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: tags Message-ID: <20040505031901.GM5654@alcor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 tags 81829 - sid tags 152711 - unreproducible thanks -- - mdz   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#81829: apt segfaults on corrupted /var/cache/apt/*.bin files Reply-To: James Paige , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: James Paige Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:18:08 UTC Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 81829-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.1089216050476 (code B ref 81829); Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:18:08 UTC Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 16:00:50 +0000 Received: from (westcoastaerospace.com) [208.216.151.150] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BiEqo-00007V-00; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:00:50 -0700 Received: (qmail 23408 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2004 16:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?208.216.151.137?) (208.216.151.137) by 208.216.151.150 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2004 16:09:06 -0000 Message-ID: <40EC1D7C.2000206@westcoastaerospace.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:57:48 -0700 From: James Paige Organization: West Coast Aerospace, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Macintosh/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050602050504030704090405" Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050602050504030704090405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I had what appears to be an interrupted transfer of the "Release" file durring an apt-get update which lead to a gzip crc error, which then triggered this bug; the error: /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/install: line 57: 13081 Segmentation fault $APTGET $OPTS "$APT_OPT0" "$APT_OPT1" dselect-upgrade Whenever running apt-cache update Attached is the output of the cron job where the original corruption occured. I have already worked around the problem by moving the bad /var/cache/apt/*.bin files out of the way, so nobody needs to tell me to do that ;) --------------050602050504030704090405 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Cron test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Cron test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily" Return-Path: Delivered-To: postmaster@westcoastaerospace.com Received: (qmail 19414 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2004 13:23:40 -0000 Delivered-To: root@westcoastaerospace.com Received: (qmail 19411 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2004 13:23:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO octopus) (208.216.151.163) by 208.216.151.150 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2004 13:23:40 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 13041 invoked by uid 0); Wed, 07 Jul 2004 13:25:48 -0000 From: root@octopus.westcoastaerospace.com (Cron Daemon) To: root@westcoastaerospace.com Subject: Cron test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:25:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1089206748.231010.12945.nullmailer@octopus> /etc/cron.daily/debian-updates: Hit http://non-us.debian.org sarge/non-US/main Packages Hit http://non-us.debian.org sarge/non-US/main Release Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages [2982kB] Hit http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Release Get:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Release [81B] gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--length error Err http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) Fetched 2982kB in 44s (67.1kB/s) Reading Package Lists...Failed to fetch http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. --------------050602050504030704090405--   Acknowledgement sent to James Paige <jamesp@westcoastaerospace.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: James Paige Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was apt segfaults on corrupted /var/cache/apt/*.bin files) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <40EC1D7C.2000206@westcoastaerospace.com> References: <40EC1D7C.2000206@westcoastaerospace.com> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 16:00:50 +0000 From jamesp@westcoastaerospace.com Wed Jul 07 09:00:50 2004 Return-path: Received: from (westcoastaerospace.com) [208.216.151.150] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BiEqo-00007V-00; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:00:50 -0700 Received: (qmail 23408 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2004 16:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?208.216.151.137?) (208.216.151.137) by 208.216.151.150 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2004 16:09:06 -0000 Message-ID: <40EC1D7C.2000206@westcoastaerospace.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 08:57:48 -0700 From: James Paige Organization: West Coast Aerospace, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Macintosh/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Subject: apt segfaults on corrupted /var/cache/apt/*.bin files X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050602050504030704090405" Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050602050504030704090405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I had what appears to be an interrupted transfer of the "Release" file durring an apt-get update which lead to a gzip crc error, which then triggered this bug; the error: /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/apt/install: line 57: 13081 Segmentation fault $APTGET $OPTS "$APT_OPT0" "$APT_OPT1" dselect-upgrade Whenever running apt-cache update Attached is the output of the cron job where the original corruption occured. I have already worked around the problem by moving the bad /var/cache/apt/*.bin files out of the way, so nobody needs to tell me to do that ;) --------------050602050504030704090405 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Cron test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Cron test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily" Return-Path: Delivered-To: postmaster@westcoastaerospace.com Received: (qmail 19414 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2004 13:23:40 -0000 Delivered-To: root@westcoastaerospace.com Received: (qmail 19411 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2004 13:23:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO octopus) (208.216.151.163) by 208.216.151.150 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2004 13:23:40 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 13041 invoked by uid 0); Wed, 07 Jul 2004 13:25:48 -0000 From: root@octopus.westcoastaerospace.com (Cron Daemon) To: root@westcoastaerospace.com Subject: Cron test -e /usr/sbin/anacron || run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: X-Cron-Env: Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:25:48 -0700 Message-Id: <1089206748.231010.12945.nullmailer@octopus> /etc/cron.daily/debian-updates: Hit http://non-us.debian.org sarge/non-US/main Packages Hit http://non-us.debian.org sarge/non-US/main Release Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages [2982kB] Hit http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org sarge/updates/main Release Get:2 http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Release [81B] gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--length error Err http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) Fetched 2982kB in 44s (67.1kB/s) Reading Package Lists...Failed to fetch http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz Sub-process gzip returned an error code (1) W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... W: Couldn't stat source package list http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sarge_main_binary-i386_Packages) - stat (2 No such file or directory) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. --------------050602050504030704090405--   Merged 81829 93453 98017 165448 166306 171248 173616 177604 177871 186366 211769 216249 218917 270147. Request was from Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2004 19:15:17 +0000 From mdz@alcor.net Sun Sep 05 12:15:17 2004 Return-path: Received: from mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C42Tt-00021Q-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 12:15:17 -0700 Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.207]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040905191446.HOEB2583.mta9.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net>; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 15:14:46 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1C42TN-0006pr-LY; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 12:14:45 -0700 Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 12:14:45 -0700 From: Matt Zimmerman To: Ryan Lovett , 270147@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#270147: apt: segfault in package removal Message-ID: <20040905191445.GH6065@alcor.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Sender: Matt Zimmerman Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 merge 270147 81829 thanks On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 11:55:25AM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote: > Other apt bug reports reported success in moving aside > /var/cache/apt/*.bin so I did that and was able to remove the package > without a segfault. Then it's clear that this is a duplicate report. Merging. > I still have the *.bin files if someone needs them. It seems quite likely that they are corrupt. I don't think there are any documented cases of apt corrupting the files on its own, but it is apparently quite common for kernel/fs bugs and the like to cause this. -- - mdz   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#81829: Bub 81829 again? Reply-To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:04:27 UTC Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 81829-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.109774723730860 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:04:27 UTC Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 09:47:17 +0000 Received: from gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CI2Ca-00081T-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 02:47:16 -0700 Received: from gehry.upc.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9E9lCHu011445; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:12 +0200 Received: from ackerman.upc.es (ackerman.upcnetadm.upcnet.es [147.83.2.243]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9E9lBGC011428; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:12 +0200 Received: from hoth.upc.es ([147.83.133.103]) by ackerman.upc.es (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2004101411471110:29091 ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:11 +0200 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Jason Gunthorpe MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200410141147.10710.lepalom@wol.es> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 11:47:11, Serialize by Router on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 11:47:12, Serialize complete at 14/10/2004 11:47:12 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Dear people, 3 years ago this bug was happened. [1] Now I have the same problem with a Sarge from 30 july 2004. I also have=20 strange behaviour as do: dpkg -l > packages=20 and found errors in some packages because the name is malformed and run aga= in=20 the dpkg and found errors in another packages, and run again and non error= =20 found. Also, rm the /var/cache/apt/*.bin doesn't works, and all of the problems be= gan=20 with an error of gzip : gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error =2E... So, how I can know if it's and error of apt, or libc/libstdc++ as you said?= Or=20 is again a problem of apt, pr the hd fail? Thank's in advance. Leo Pd I have to say that I'm a bit worry .... =2D----------------------------------------------- [1] Message received at 81829@bugs.debian.org: =20 Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 21:12:55 +0000 =46rom jgg@debian.org Thu Feb 15 15:12:54 2001 Return-path: Received: from cast-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.34]=20 by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TVhu-0005SI-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:12:54 -0600 Received: (qmail 7045 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63])=20 (envelope-sender ) by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Feb 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=3Dwakko.deltatee.com ident=3Djgg) by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14TVho-0003C8-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:12:48 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:12:47 -0700 (MST) =46rom: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk , 81829@bugs.debian.org cc: Anthony Towns , debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.o= rg,=20 APT Development Team Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? In-Reply-To:=20 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=3DUS-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to > "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same > problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it > isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. Their are only 2 known cases where this happens: 1) Your libc/libstdc++ is screwed 2) Your system has corrupted the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin In #1 you have to fix it, in #2 it usually fixes itself next 'update', but if that is not the case 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin' always fixes it. =20 Nobody has been able to show that these are actual APT bugs, the reason I have not closed the reports is because I would like it to handle #2 more elegantly and make a better error message. Jason   Acknowledgement sent to Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <lepalom@wol.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Bub 81829 again?) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200410141147.10710.lepalom@wol.es> References: <200410141147.10710.lepalom@wol.es> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 09:47:17 +0000 From lepalom@wol.es Thu Oct 14 02:47:16 2004 Return-path: Received: from gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CI2Ca-00081T-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 02:47:16 -0700 Received: from gehry.upc.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9E9lCHu011445; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:12 +0200 Received: from ackerman.upc.es (ackerman.upcnetadm.upcnet.es [147.83.2.243]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9E9lBGC011428; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:12 +0200 Received: from hoth.upc.es ([147.83.133.103]) by ackerman.upc.es (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2004101411471110:29091 ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:11 +0200 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bub 81829 again? Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:47:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Jason Gunthorpe MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200410141147.10710.lepalom@wol.es> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 11:47:11, Serialize by Router on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 11:47:12, Serialize complete at 14/10/2004 11:47:12 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Dear people, 3 years ago this bug was happened. [1] Now I have the same problem with a Sarge from 30 july 2004. I also have=20 strange behaviour as do: dpkg -l > packages=20 and found errors in some packages because the name is malformed and run aga= in=20 the dpkg and found errors in another packages, and run again and non error= =20 found. Also, rm the /var/cache/apt/*.bin doesn't works, and all of the problems be= gan=20 with an error of gzip : gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error =2E... So, how I can know if it's and error of apt, or libc/libstdc++ as you said?= Or=20 is again a problem of apt, pr the hd fail? Thank's in advance. Leo Pd I have to say that I'm a bit worry .... =2D----------------------------------------------- [1] Message received at 81829@bugs.debian.org: =20 Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2001 21:12:55 +0000 =46rom jgg@debian.org Thu Feb 15 15:12:54 2001 Return-path: Received: from cast-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.34]=20 by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14TVhu-0005SI-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:12:54 -0600 Received: (qmail 7045 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63])=20 (envelope-sender ) by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Feb 2001 21:12:49 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=3Dwakko.deltatee.com ident=3Djgg) by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14TVho-0003C8-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:12:48 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:12:47 -0700 (MST) =46rom: Jason Gunthorpe X-Sender: jgg@wakko.deltatee.com To: Adrian Bunk , 81829@bugs.debian.org cc: Anthony Towns , debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.o= rg,=20 APT Development Team Subject: Re: Bug#81829: How to avoid the segfault in apt-get? In-Reply-To:=20 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=3DUS-ASCII Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I see you have downgraded this bug reported by Wichert from "grave" to > "normal". Is there a specific reason for this downgrade? I have the same > problem with every call to "apt-get" and I'm wondering why you assume it > isn't "grave" that "apt-get" is completely broken for me. Their are only 2 known cases where this happens: 1) Your libc/libstdc++ is screwed 2) Your system has corrupted the data in /var/cache/apt/*.bin In #1 you have to fix it, in #2 it usually fixes itself next 'update', but if that is not the case 'rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin' always fixes it. =20 Nobody has been able to show that these are actual APT bugs, the reason I have not closed the reports is because I would like it to handle #2 more elegantly and make a better error message. Jason   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#81829: Adding some more info Reply-To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:18:06 UTC Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 81829-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.109774835410421 (code B ref 81829); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:18:06 UTC Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 10:05:54 +0000 Received: from gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CI2Ub-0002fR-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 03:05:53 -0700 Received: from gehry.upc.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9EA5pkM008537; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:51 +0200 Received: from ackerman.upc.es (ackerman.upcnetadm.upcnet.es [147.83.2.243]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9EA5oea008524; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:50 +0200 Received: from hoth.upc.es ([147.83.133.103]) by ackerman.upc.es (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2004101412054971:29231 ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:49 +0200 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Jason Gunthorpe MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200410141205.49111.lepalom@wol.es> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 12:05:49, Serialize by Router on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 12:05:50 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_LATIN autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: IyBnZGIgYXB0LWdldA0KR05VIGdkYiA2LjEtZGViaWFuDQpDb3B5cmlnaHQgMjAwNCBGcmVlIFNv ZnR3YXJlIEZvdW5kYXRpb24sIEluYy4NCkdEQiBpcyBmcmVlIHNvZnR3YXJlLCBjb3ZlcmVkIGJ5 IHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSwgYW5kIHlvdSBhcmUNCndlbGNvbWUgdG8g Y2hhbmdlIGl0IGFuZC9vciBkaXN0cmlidXRlIGNvcGllcyBvZiBpdCB1bmRlciBjZXJ0YWluIGNv bmRpdGlvbnMuDQpUeXBlICJzaG93IGNvcHlpbmciIHRvIHNlZSB0aGUgY29uZGl0aW9ucy4NClRo ZXJlIGlzIGFic29sdXRlbHkgbm8gd2FycmFudHkgZm9yIEdEQi4gIFR5cGUgInNob3cgd2FycmFu dHkiIGZvciBkZXRhaWxzLg0KVGhpcyBHREIgd2FzIGNvbmZpZ3VyZWQgYXMgImkzODYtbGludXgi Li4uKG5vIGRlYnVnZ2luZyBzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLlVzaW5nIA0KaG9zdCBsaWJ0aHJlYWRf ZGIgbGlicmFyeSAiL2xpYi90bHMvbGlidGhyZWFkX2RiLnNvLjEiLg0KDQooZ2RiKSBydW4gdXBn cmFkZQ0KU3RhcnRpbmcgcHJvZ3JhbTogL3Vzci9iaW4vYXB0LWdldCB1cGdyYWRlDQoobm8gZGVi dWdnaW5nIHN5bWJvbHMgZm91bmQpLi4uKG5vIGRlYnVnZ2luZyBzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLihu byBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgDQpzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLihubyBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgc3ltYm9scyBmb3Vu ZCkuLi4obm8gZGVidWdnaW5nIFMnZXN04CBsbGVnaW50IA0KbGEgbGxpc3RhIGRlIHBhcXVldHMu Li4gQWNhYmF0Li4uKG5vIGRlYnVnZ2luZyBzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLihubyBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcg DQpzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLg0KUydlc3TgIGNvbnN0cnVpbnQgbCdhcmJyZSBkZSBkZXBlbmTo bmNpZXMuLi4gQWNhYmF0DQoNClByb2dyYW0gcmVjZWl2ZWQgc2lnbmFsIFNJR1NFR1YsIFNlZ21l bnRhdGlvbiBmYXVsdC4NCjB4NDAwNWJlYTEgaW4gcGtnRGVwQ2FjaGU6Ok1hcmtJbnN0YWxsICgp IA0KZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xpYi9saWJhcHQtcGtnLWxpYmM2LjMtNS5zby4zLjMNCg0KDQotLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBh Y2thZ2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJvciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9h dmFpbGFibGUnIG5lYXIgbGluZSA4MzIxMiANCnBhcXVldCCrbGlic25kZmlsZTG7Og0KIGZpZWxk ICCrRGVwZW5kc7ssIHJlZmVyZWNlIHRvIKtsaWJjNrs6IHZlcnNpb24gY29udGFpbnMgYSCrILsN CmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZXhwb3J0IExBTkc9Qw0KZ2FtYXJ1czp+IyBkcGtnIC1sID4gcGFja2FnZXMN CmRwa2ctcXVlcnk6IHBhcnNlIGVycm9yLCBpbiBmaWxlIGAvdmFyL2xpYi9kcGtnL2F2YWlsYWJs ZScgbmVhciBsaW5lIDUyODc2IA0KcGFja2FnZSBgZ2tyZWxsbSc6DQogYENvbmZsaWN0cycgZmll bGQsIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgZ2tyZWxsbS1nbm9tZSc6IHZlcnNpb24gY29udGFpbnMgYCAnDQpn YW1hcnVzOn4jIGRwa2cgLWwgPiBwYWNrYWdlcw0KZ2FtYXJ1czp+IyBkcGtnIC1sID4gcGFja2Fn ZXMNCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBhY2thZ2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJv ciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9zdGF0dXMnIG5lYXIgbGluZSAxOTE1NjoNCiBpbnZh bGlkIHBhY2thZ2UgbmFtZSAoY2hhcmFjdGVyIGD/JyBub3QgYWxsb3dlZCAtIG9ubHkgbGV0dGVy cywgZGlnaXRzIGFuZCANCi0rLl8gYWxsb3dlZCkNCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBhY2th Z2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJvciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9hdmFp bGFibGUnIG5lYXIgbGluZSAzMzM4NyANCnBhY2thZ2UgYG52dHYnOg0KIGZpZWxkIG5hbWUgYP9z aXplcywnIG11c3QgYmUgZm9sbG93ZWQgYnkgY29sb24NCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBh Y2thZ2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJvciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9h dmFpbGFibGUnIG5lYXIgbGluZSAzOTA1MyANCnBhY2thZ2UgYGx2JzoNCiBgRGVwZW5kcycgZmll bGQsIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgbGlibmN1cnNlczUnOiB2ZXJzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIGAgJw0KZ2Ft YXJ1czp+IyBkcGtnIC1sID4gcGFja2FnZXMNCi4uLi4uLg0KDQo=   Acknowledgement sent to Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <lepalom@wol.es>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Subject: Bug#81829: Info received (was Adding some more info) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200410141205.49111.lepalom@wol.es> References: <200410141205.49111.lepalom@wol.es> Precedence: bulk X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): APT Development Team If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 81829@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2004 10:05:54 +0000 From lepalom@wol.es Thu Oct 14 03:05:54 2004 Return-path: Received: from gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CI2Ub-0002fR-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 03:05:53 -0700 Received: from gehry.upc.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9EA5pkM008537; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:51 +0200 Received: from ackerman.upc.es (ackerman.upcnetadm.upcnet.es [147.83.2.243]) by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9EA5oea008524; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:50 +0200 Received: from hoth.upc.es ([147.83.133.103]) by ackerman.upc.es (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2004101412054971:29231 ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:49 +0200 From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda To: 81829@bugs.debian.org Subject: Adding some more info Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:05:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: Jason Gunthorpe MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200410141205.49111.lepalom@wol.es> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 12:05:49, Serialize by Router on Ackerman/UPC(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 14/10/2004 12:05:50 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Delivered-To: 81829@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_LATIN autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: IyBnZGIgYXB0LWdldA0KR05VIGdkYiA2LjEtZGViaWFuDQpDb3B5cmlnaHQgMjAwNCBGcmVlIFNv ZnR3YXJlIEZvdW5kYXRpb24sIEluYy4NCkdEQiBpcyBmcmVlIHNvZnR3YXJlLCBjb3ZlcmVkIGJ5 IHRoZSBHTlUgR2VuZXJhbCBQdWJsaWMgTGljZW5zZSwgYW5kIHlvdSBhcmUNCndlbGNvbWUgdG8g Y2hhbmdlIGl0IGFuZC9vciBkaXN0cmlidXRlIGNvcGllcyBvZiBpdCB1bmRlciBjZXJ0YWluIGNv bmRpdGlvbnMuDQpUeXBlICJzaG93IGNvcHlpbmciIHRvIHNlZSB0aGUgY29uZGl0aW9ucy4NClRo ZXJlIGlzIGFic29sdXRlbHkgbm8gd2FycmFudHkgZm9yIEdEQi4gIFR5cGUgInNob3cgd2FycmFu dHkiIGZvciBkZXRhaWxzLg0KVGhpcyBHREIgd2FzIGNvbmZpZ3VyZWQgYXMgImkzODYtbGludXgi Li4uKG5vIGRlYnVnZ2luZyBzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLlVzaW5nIA0KaG9zdCBsaWJ0aHJlYWRf ZGIgbGlicmFyeSAiL2xpYi90bHMvbGlidGhyZWFkX2RiLnNvLjEiLg0KDQooZ2RiKSBydW4gdXBn cmFkZQ0KU3RhcnRpbmcgcHJvZ3JhbTogL3Vzci9iaW4vYXB0LWdldCB1cGdyYWRlDQoobm8gZGVi dWdnaW5nIHN5bWJvbHMgZm91bmQpLi4uKG5vIGRlYnVnZ2luZyBzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLihu byBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgDQpzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLihubyBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcgc3ltYm9scyBmb3Vu ZCkuLi4obm8gZGVidWdnaW5nIFMnZXN04CBsbGVnaW50IA0KbGEgbGxpc3RhIGRlIHBhcXVldHMu Li4gQWNhYmF0Li4uKG5vIGRlYnVnZ2luZyBzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLihubyBkZWJ1Z2dpbmcg DQpzeW1ib2xzIGZvdW5kKS4uLg0KUydlc3TgIGNvbnN0cnVpbnQgbCdhcmJyZSBkZSBkZXBlbmTo bmNpZXMuLi4gQWNhYmF0DQoNClByb2dyYW0gcmVjZWl2ZWQgc2lnbmFsIFNJR1NFR1YsIFNlZ21l bnRhdGlvbiBmYXVsdC4NCjB4NDAwNWJlYTEgaW4gcGtnRGVwQ2FjaGU6Ok1hcmtJbnN0YWxsICgp IA0KZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xpYi9saWJhcHQtcGtnLWxpYmM2LjMtNS5zby4zLjMNCg0KDQotLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBh Y2thZ2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJvciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9h dmFpbGFibGUnIG5lYXIgbGluZSA4MzIxMiANCnBhcXVldCCrbGlic25kZmlsZTG7Og0KIGZpZWxk ICCrRGVwZW5kc7ssIHJlZmVyZWNlIHRvIKtsaWJjNrs6IHZlcnNpb24gY29udGFpbnMgYSCrILsN CmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZXhwb3J0IExBTkc9Qw0KZ2FtYXJ1czp+IyBkcGtnIC1sID4gcGFja2FnZXMN CmRwa2ctcXVlcnk6IHBhcnNlIGVycm9yLCBpbiBmaWxlIGAvdmFyL2xpYi9kcGtnL2F2YWlsYWJs ZScgbmVhciBsaW5lIDUyODc2IA0KcGFja2FnZSBgZ2tyZWxsbSc6DQogYENvbmZsaWN0cycgZmll bGQsIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgZ2tyZWxsbS1nbm9tZSc6IHZlcnNpb24gY29udGFpbnMgYCAnDQpn YW1hcnVzOn4jIGRwa2cgLWwgPiBwYWNrYWdlcw0KZ2FtYXJ1czp+IyBkcGtnIC1sID4gcGFja2Fn ZXMNCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBhY2thZ2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJv ciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9zdGF0dXMnIG5lYXIgbGluZSAxOTE1NjoNCiBpbnZh bGlkIHBhY2thZ2UgbmFtZSAoY2hhcmFjdGVyIGD/JyBub3QgYWxsb3dlZCAtIG9ubHkgbGV0dGVy cywgZGlnaXRzIGFuZCANCi0rLl8gYWxsb3dlZCkNCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBhY2th Z2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJvciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9hdmFp bGFibGUnIG5lYXIgbGluZSAzMzM4NyANCnBhY2thZ2UgYG52dHYnOg0KIGZpZWxkIG5hbWUgYP9z aXplcywnIG11c3QgYmUgZm9sbG93ZWQgYnkgY29sb24NCmdhbWFydXM6fiMgZHBrZyAtbCA+IHBh Y2thZ2VzDQpkcGtnLXF1ZXJ5OiBwYXJzZSBlcnJvciwgaW4gZmlsZSBgL3Zhci9saWIvZHBrZy9h dmFpbGFibGUnIG5lYXIgbGluZSAzOTA1MyANCnBhY2thZ2UgYGx2JzoNCiBgRGVwZW5kcycgZmll bGQsIHJlZmVyZW5jZSB0byBgbGlibmN1cnNlczUnOiB2ZXJzaW9uIGNvbnRhaW5zIGAgJw0KZ2Ft YXJ1czp+IyBkcGtnIC1sID4gcGFja2FnZXMNCi4uLi4uLg0KDQo=   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team <deity@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#81829; Package apt.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAPT Development Team  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#81829: Bub 81829 again? Reply-To: Matt Zimmerman , 81829@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Matt Zimmerman Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: APT Development Team Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 06:18:02 UTC Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 81829 X-Debian-PR-Package: apt X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 81829-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B81829.109782015717750 (code B ref 81829); Fri, 15 Oct 2004 06:18:02 UTC Received: (at 81829) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2004 06:02:37 +0000 Received: from mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CILAj-0004aA-00; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:02:37 -0700 Received: from mizar.alcor.net ([69.167.148.207]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20041015060206.YYGQ18454.mta10.adelphia.net@mizar.alcor.net>; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:02:06 -0400 Received: by mizar.alcor.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D90D1B879C; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:02:05 -0700 From: Matt Zimmerman