<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Yann Dirson &lt;dirson@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#59828</code>; Package <code>plan</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgYann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
Reply-To: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>, 59828@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>
Orignal-Sender: gerdk@data-sciences.de
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 12:03:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.59828.B.95243028724243@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.95243028724243
          (code B ref -1); Tue, 07 Mar 2000 12:03:02 GMT
Sender: gerdk@data-sciences.de
Message-ID: <38C4EEC9.8C15EE1E@Data-Sciences.De>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 12:58:01 +0100
From: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>
Organization: csg UB Data Sciences ...an IBM Global Services Company
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: plan
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: normal

a) plan dies
since two weeks or such plan isn't working any more. each time i start
it up it shows up on screen, but as soon as i try to launch any action
it dies and dissapears. while tracing it back a little (strace) i found
it dies immediately after startup, but just it's x-output stays alive,
an while hitting it will dissapeare then, of course.  removing any
pre-existent ~/plan* directory seems to solve the problem, plan doesn't
die any more. putting previus plan-files back to an new ~/.plan.dir/  it
dies again.

b) docu wrong?
going on debugging with reading /usr/doc/plan/README.Debian  i'm told
plan reads it's files from version 1.8.2 out of ~/.pland/ which is not
tue. strarting plan without any existing ~/.plan* directory it complains
about missing plan.dir:

> gerdk@stardust gerdk >plan
> gerdk@stardust gerdk >plan: warning: bad font for calNumberFont
> ERROR:
>
> Error while reading files:
> Failed to read master file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan, error 2
> Failed to read private file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan.priv, error 2
> ERROR:
>
> Error while reading files:
> Failed to read master file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan, error 2
> Failed to read private file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan.priv, error 2
> plan: WARNING - no daemon, /home/gerdk//.plan.dir/lock.pland: No such
> file or directory
> plan: WARNING: can't signal daemon: No such file or directory

this is some error to documentation or to behaviour of plan.

back to a)
next i copied plan files (locally customized  entries) setp by step to
~/.plan.dir and found on file causing  those exits. i tried to find out
which entry it is, but it seemes to be an combination of entries. all i
could find is an part of the profile working now and a diff that makes
plan to die.

> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >diff Admin_3.bak  Admin_3_ok
> 8,22d7
> < 2/9/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 950227200 62 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/9/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 950227200 54 0 0
> < N     var
> < 2/22/2000  9:0:0  4:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     86400 951696000 62 0 0
> < N     FAI
> < 2/28/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/28/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     var
> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >
>

Admin_* are files read by plan. trying out to delete these diff-entries
one each time in the real file  didn't succeed. furthre more, taking
this diff all alone plan will run ok. testing one more thing w.rsp to
part c) of this mail i found  those entries from 28 Feb causing the
trouble. removing them both from file lets plan run fine_


> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >diff Admin_3.bak  Admin_3
> 17,22d16
> < 2/28/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/28/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     var
> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >
>

so it seems to be a bug in handling 28/29 of February?

c) error in year's overview
well, short to say: 29th of Feb is not missing in year oberview but 1st
of  March (which probeabely will be countet as 29th Feb). i guess this
causes error with handlind dates on 2/29 rsp. 3/1.


-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux stardust 2.2.13 #1 Sat Nov 20 12:44:19 EST 1999
i686 unknown

Versions of the packages plan depends on:
ii  lesstif1                     0.89.4-1                     OSF/Motif
implementation released under LGPL.
ii  libc6                        2.1.3-5                      GNU C
Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
ii  xlib6g                       3.3.6-3                      shared
libraries required by X clients
ii  xpm4g                        3.4k-5                       the X
PixMap library
        ^^^ (Provides virtual package libxpm4)
--
  Gerhard




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Gerhard Kroder &lt;Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de&gt;</code>:<br>
New Bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>Yann Dirson &lt;dirson@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>
Subject: Bug#59828: Acknowledgement (plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March)
Message-ID: <handler.59828.B.95243028724243.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <38C4EEC9.8C15EE1E@Data-Sciences.De>
References: <38C4EEC9.8C15EE1E@Data-Sciences.De>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 59828

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Yann Dirson <dirson@debian.org>

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 59828@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2000 11:58:07 +0000
Received: (qmail 24241 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2000 11:58:07 -0000
Received: from soco.de (194.221.170.1)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2000 11:58:07 -0000
Received: from gandalf. (cache.data-sciences.de [195.27.152.3] (may be forged))
	by soco.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA28172
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:58:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from postix.ds.com ([130.1.1.224]) by gandalf.data-sciences.de; Tue, 07 Mar 2000 12:56:35 +0000 (MET)
Received: from Data-Sciences.De 
	by mail.data-sciences.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16147
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 12:58:03 +0100
Sender: gerdk@data-sciences.de
Message-ID: <38C4EEC9.8C15EE1E@Data-Sciences.De>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 12:58:01 +0100
From: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>
Organization: csg UB Data Sciences ...an IBM Global Services Company
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.13 i686)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: plan
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: normal

a) plan dies
since two weeks or such plan isn't working any more. each time i start
it up it shows up on screen, but as soon as i try to launch any action
it dies and dissapears. while tracing it back a little (strace) i found
it dies immediately after startup, but just it's x-output stays alive,
an while hitting it will dissapeare then, of course.  removing any
pre-existent ~/plan* directory seems to solve the problem, plan doesn't
die any more. putting previus plan-files back to an new ~/.plan.dir/  it
dies again.

b) docu wrong?
going on debugging with reading /usr/doc/plan/README.Debian  i'm told
plan reads it's files from version 1.8.2 out of ~/.pland/ which is not
tue. strarting plan without any existing ~/.plan* directory it complains
about missing plan.dir:

> gerdk@stardust gerdk >plan
> gerdk@stardust gerdk >plan: warning: bad font for calNumberFont
> ERROR:
>
> Error while reading files:
> Failed to read master file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan, error 2
> Failed to read private file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan.priv, error 2
> ERROR:
>
> Error while reading files:
> Failed to read master file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan, error 2
> Failed to read private file ~/.plan.dir/dayplan.priv, error 2
> plan: WARNING - no daemon, /home/gerdk//.plan.dir/lock.pland: No such
> file or directory
> plan: WARNING: can't signal daemon: No such file or directory

this is some error to documentation or to behaviour of plan.

back to a)
next i copied plan files (locally customized  entries) setp by step to
~/.plan.dir and found on file causing  those exits. i tried to find out
which entry it is, but it seemes to be an combination of entries. all i
could find is an part of the profile working now and a diff that makes
plan to die.

> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >diff Admin_3.bak  Admin_3_ok
> 8,22d7
> < 2/9/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 950227200 62 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/9/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 950227200 54 0 0
> < N     var
> < 2/22/2000  9:0:0  4:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     86400 951696000 62 0 0
> < N     FAI
> < 2/28/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/28/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     var
> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >
>

Admin_* are files read by plan. trying out to delete these diff-entries
one each time in the real file  didn't succeed. furthre more, taking
this diff all alone plan will run ok. testing one more thing w.rsp to
part c) of this mail i found  those entries from 28 Feb causing the
trouble. removing them both from file lets plan run fine_


> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >diff Admin_3.bak  Admin_3
> 17,22d16
> < 2/28/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/28/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     var
> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >
>

so it seems to be a bug in handling 28/29 of February?

c) error in year's overview
well, short to say: 29th of Feb is not missing in year oberview but 1st
of  March (which probeabely will be countet as 29th Feb). i guess this
causes error with handlind dates on 2/29 rsp. 3/1.


-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux stardust 2.2.13 #1 Sat Nov 20 12:44:19 EST 1999
i686 unknown

Versions of the packages plan depends on:
ii  lesstif1                     0.89.4-1                     OSF/Motif
implementation released under LGPL.
ii  libc6                        2.1.3-5                      GNU C
Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
ii  xlib6g                       3.3.6-3                      shared
libraries required by X clients
ii  xpm4g                        3.4k-5                       the X
PixMap library
        ^^^ (Provides virtual package libxpm4)
--
  Gerhard




<strong>Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Thomas Driemeyer &lt;thomas@bitrot.de&gt;.</strong>
Request was from <code>Adrian Bunk &lt;bunk@fs.tum.de&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2000 19:21:54 +0000
From bunk@fs.tum.de Sun Jun 11 14:21:54 2000
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.176.79] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 131DIv-0001Sb-00; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:21:53 -0500
Received: (qmail 8930 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2000 19:21:52 -0000
Received: from neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.176.23)
  by nilpferd.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP; 11 Jun 2000 19:21:52 -0000
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 21:21:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
X-Sender: bunk@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de
Reply-To: 59828@bugs.debian.org
To: Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Debian Bugs information: additional logs for Bug#59828 (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006112106340.25391-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

forwarded 59828 Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
thanks

Hi Thomas,

I found the following bug report sent by a user at the Debian bug tracking
system (if you are wondering why there's no b): this is only a minor
documention issue in the Debian package I will fix soon).

cu,
Adrian


---------- Forwarded message ----------

Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 12:58:01 +0100
From: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>

Package: plan
Version: 1.8.3-1
Severity: normal

a) plan dies
since two weeks or such plan isn't working any more. each time i start
it up it shows up on screen, but as soon as i try to launch any action
it dies and dissapears. while tracing it back a little (strace) i found
it dies immediately after startup, but just it's x-output stays alive,
an while hitting it will dissapeare then, of course.  removing any
pre-existent ~/plan* directory seems to solve the problem, plan doesn't
die any more. putting previus plan-files back to an new ~/.plan.dir/  it
dies again.

...

next i copied plan files (locally customized  entries) setp by step to
~/.plan.dir and found on file causing  those exits. i tried to find out
which entry it is, but it seemes to be an combination of entries. all i
could find is an part of the profile working now and a diff that makes
plan to die.

> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >diff Admin_3.bak  Admin_3_ok
> 8,22d7
> < 2/9/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 950227200 62 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/9/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 950227200 54 0 0
> < N     var
> < 2/22/2000  9:0:0  4:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     86400 951696000 62 0 0
> < N     FAI
> < 2/28/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/28/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     var
> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >
>

Admin_* are files read by plan. trying out to delete these diff-entries
one each time in the real file  didn't succeed. furthre more, taking
this diff all alone plan will run ok. testing one more thing w.rsp to
part c) of this mail i found  those entries from 28 Feb causing the
trouble. removing them both from file lets plan run fine_


> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >diff Admin_3.bak  Admin_3
> 17,22d16
> < 2/28/2000  14:0:0  1:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     4060.0.0
> < 2/28/2000  15:0:0  2:0:0  0:20:0  0:5:0  ---------- 0 0
> < R     0 0 54 0 0
> < N     var
> gerdk@stardust .plan.dir >
>

so it seems to be a bug in handling 28/29 of February?

c) error in year's overview
well, short to say: 29th of Feb is not missing in year oberview but 1st
of  March (which probeabely will be countet as 29th Feb). i guess this
causes error with handlind dates on 2/29 rsp. 3/1.


-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux stardust 2.2.13 #1 Sat Nov 20 12:44:19 EST 1999
i686 unknown

Versions of the packages plan depends on:
ii  lesstif1                     0.89.4-1                     OSF/Motif
implementation released under LGPL.
ii  libc6                        2.1.3-5                      GNU C
Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data
ii  xlib6g                       3.3.6-3                      shared
libraries required by X clients
ii  xpm4g                        3.4k-5                       the X
PixMap library
        ^^^ (Provides virtual package libxpm4)
--
  Gerhard






<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bunk &lt;bunk@fs.tum.de&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#59828</code>; Package <code>plan</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

Subject: Bug#59828: Processed: Debian Bugs information: additional logs for Bug#59828 (fwd)
Reply-To: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System), 59828@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:38:35 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.59828.B59828.96075200012040@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 59828-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B59828.96075200012040
          (code B ref 59828); Sun, 11 Jun 2000 19:38:35 GMT
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: 59828@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org (#59828),
    Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> (plan #59828)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006112106340.25391-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006112106340.25391-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Message-ID: <handler.s.C.9607513145631.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:33:19 -0500
Delivered-To: 59828@bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 59828 Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
Bug#59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bunk &lt;bunk@fs.tum.de&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Subject: Bug#59828: Info received (was Processed: Debian Bugs information: additional logs for Bug#59828 (fwd))
Message-ID: <handler.59828.B59828.96075200012040.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <handler.s.C.9607513145631.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <handler.s.C.9607513145631.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 59828

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 59828@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 59828) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2000 19:33:20 +0000
From mailerrors@bugs.debian.org Sun Jun 11 14:33:20 2000
Return-path: <mailerrors@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from gecko by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 131DTz-000387-00; Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:33:19 -0500
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: 59828@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org (#59828),
    Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> (plan #59828)
Subject: Processed: Debian Bugs information: additional logs for Bug#59828 (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006112106340.25391-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006112106340.25391-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Message-ID: <handler.s.C.9607513145631.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 14:33:19 -0500
Delivered-To: 59828@bugs.debian.org

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 59828 Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
Bug#59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)





<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bunk &lt;bunk@fs.tum.de&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#59828</code>; Package <code>plan</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

Subject: Bug#59828: Debian Bugs information: additional logs for Bug#59828 (fwd)
Reply-To: Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>, 59828@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:51:03 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.59828.B59828.96092505215463@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 59828-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B59828.96092505215463
          (code B ref 59828); Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:51:03 GMT
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:38:36 +0200 (MEST)
From: Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
X-Sender: thomas@gate
To: 59828@bugs.debian.org
cc: control@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006112106340.25391-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006132136190.1047-100000@gate>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 59828@bugs.debian.org

On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> From: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>
> 
> since two weeks or such plan isn't working any more. each time i start
> it up it shows up on screen, but as soon as i try to launch any action
> it dies and dissapears. while tracing it back a little (strace) i found

Someone recently found a heap overrun on certain days, if plan thinks
there are fewer lines in a month view than there really are. Sometimes
it crashes right away but usually it limps on for a while. It's purely
concidental that the problem hasn't happened until a few months ago...
I can't be certain but the bug report looks suspiciously familiar.

Thomas

--
Thomas Driemeyer    thomas@bitrot.de    www.bitrot.de    +49-30-89092917





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Thomas Driemeyer &lt;thomas@bitrot.de&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bunk &lt;bunk@fs.tum.de&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
Subject: Bug#59828: Info received (was Debian Bugs information: additional logs for Bug#59828 (fwd))
Message-ID: <handler.59828.B59828.96092505215463.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006132136190.1047-100000@gate>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006132136190.1047-100000@gate>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 59828

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 59828@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 59828) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2000 19:37:32 +0000
From thomas@bitrot.de Tue Jun 13 14:37:32 2000
Return-path: <thomas@bitrot.de>
Received: from frosch.logivision.net (frosch.all.de) [212.42.242.2] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 131wV9-00040s-00; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 14:37:31 -0500
Received: by frosch.logivision.net (8.9.3/nora-19990817) with ESMTP
          from bolzen.all.de (hammer.logivision.de [212.42.242.1]) (envelope-from thomas@bitrot.de)
          id VAA60155; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:37:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bolzen.all.de (8.9.3) with UUCP (envelope-from thomas@bitrot.de)
          id VAA21144; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:37:25 +0200
Received: from localhost (thomas@localhost)
	by gate.bitrot.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA32543;
	Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:38:37 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 21:38:36 +0200 (MEST)
From: Thomas Driemeyer <thomas@bitrot.de>
X-Sender: thomas@gate
To: 59828@bugs.debian.org
cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian Bugs information: additional logs for Bug#59828 (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.21.0006112106340.25391-100000@neptun.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006132136190.1047-100000@gate>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 59828@bugs.debian.org

On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> From: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>
> 
> since two weeks or such plan isn't working any more. each time i start
> it up it shows up on screen, but as soon as i try to launch any action
> it dies and dissapears. while tracing it back a little (strace) i found

Someone recently found a heap overrun on certain days, if plan thinks
there are fewer lines in a month view than there really are. Sometimes
it crashes right away but usually it limps on for a while. It's purely
concidental that the problem hasn't happened until a few months ago...
I can't be certain but the bug report looks suspiciously familiar.

Thomas

--
Thomas Driemeyer    thomas@bitrot.de    www.bitrot.de    +49-30-89092917





<strong>Information stored</strong>:<br>
<code>Bug#59828</code>; Package <code>plan</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
Reply-To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Original-Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Resent-To: 
Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:48:52 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.59828.Q59828.110495350422258@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org id=Q59828.110495350422258
          (code Q ref 59828); Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:48:52 UTC
Received: (at 59828-quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2005 19:31:44 +0000
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CmGsi-0005mn-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:31:44 -0800
Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29])
	by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CmGse-0002Xe-Qr
	for 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:40 +0100
Received: from diskless.uio.no ([129.240.186.27])
	by smtp.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CmGsb-0007fx-G6; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:37 +0100
Received: from pre by diskless.uio.no with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1CmGsb-00043y-De; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:37 +0100
To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E1CmGsb-00043y-De@diskless.uio.no>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:37 +0100
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5, required 12,
	UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Delivered-To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


I asked the upstream author about this bug, and Thomas Driemeyer
replied:

   * #59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
	--> Right, there appears to be a bug in the year overview on leap
	    years. Needs to be fixed before 2008. :-)




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Petter Reinholdtsen &lt;pere@hungry.com&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Subject: Bug#59828: Info received and FILED only
         (was plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March)
Message-ID: <handler.59828.Q59828.110495350422258.ackinfoquiet@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1CmGsb-00043y-De@diskless.uio.no>
References: <E1CmGsb-00043y-De@diskless.uio.no>
Precedence: bulk
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-quiet 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Reply-To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has NOT been forwarded to the package
maintainers, but will accompany the original report in the Bug
tracking system.  Please ensure that you yourself have sent a copy of
the additional information to any relevant developers or mailing lists.

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 59828-quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2005 19:31:44 +0000
From pre@diskless.uio.no Wed Jan 05 11:31:44 2005
Return-path: <pre@diskless.uio.no>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CmGsi-0005mn-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:31:44 -0800
Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29])
	by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CmGse-0002Xe-Qr
	for 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:40 +0100
Received: from diskless.uio.no ([129.240.186.27])
	by smtp.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CmGsb-0007fx-G6; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:37 +0100
Received: from pre by diskless.uio.no with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1CmGsb-00043y-De; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:37 +0100
To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E1CmGsb-00043y-De@diskless.uio.no>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:31:37 +0100
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact postmaster@uio.no if you have questions about this scanning
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5, required 12,
	UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Delivered-To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


I asked the upstream author about this bug, and Thomas Driemeyer
replied:

   * #59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
	--> Right, there appears to be a bug in the year overview on leap
	    years. Needs to be fixed before 2008. :-)




<strong>Information stored</strong>:<br>
<code>Bug#59828</code>; Package <code>plan</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
Reply-To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Original-Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Resent-To: 
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:18:07 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.59828.Q59828.113563501010200@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org id=Q59828.113563501010200
          (code Q ref 59828); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:18:07 UTC
Received: (at 59828-quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2005 22:10:10 +0000
Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Er0Xh-0002eL-Ty; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:10:10 -0800
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44])
	by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0Xe-0006Ae-4u; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:10:06 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
	by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0XW-0003Eh-Gk; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:58 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1Er0XV-0002lN-PJ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 59828-submitter@bugs.debian.org
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2flpsnj8q8a.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.194, required 12,
	autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.81, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


The file README.Debian now lists .plan.day and not .pland, so this
part of the bug is fixed.  The other error might be fixed in version
1.9.  Please test and let me know if the problem is still there.  If
it isn't (or I do not hear anything for a few weeks), I'll close this
bug as resolved.




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Petter Reinholdtsen &lt;pere@hungry.com&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Subject: Bug#59828: Info received and FILED only
         (was plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March)
Message-ID: <handler.59828.Q59828.113563501010200.ackinfoquiet@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <2flpsnj8q8a.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
References: <2flpsnj8q8a.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
Precedence: bulk
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-quiet 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Reply-To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has NOT been forwarded to the package
maintainers, but will accompany the original report in the Bug
tracking system.  Please ensure that you yourself have sent a copy of
the additional information to any relevant developers or mailing lists.

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 59828-quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2005 22:10:10 +0000
From pre@saruman.uio.no Mon Dec 26 14:10:10 2005
Return-path: <pre@saruman.uio.no>
Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Er0Xh-0002eL-Ty; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:10:10 -0800
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44])
	by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0Xe-0006Ae-4u; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:10:06 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
	by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0XW-0003Eh-Gk; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:58 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1Er0XV-0002lN-PJ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 59828-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2flpsnj8q8a.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.194, required 12,
	autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.81, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


The file README.Debian now lists .plan.day and not .pland, so this
part of the bug is fixed.  The other error might be fixed in version
1.9.  Please test and let me know if the problem is still there.  If
it isn't (or I do not hear anything for a few weeks), I'll close this
bug as resolved.




<strong>Message sent on</strong> to <code>Gerhard Kroder &lt;Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de&gt;</code>:<br>
Bug#59828.


Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#59828: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
Reply-To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Original-Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Resent-To: Gerhard Kroder <Gerhard.Kroder@data-sciences.de>
Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:18:08 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.59828.U59828.113563501010208@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 59828
X-Debian-PR-Package: plan
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 59828-submitter@bugs.debian.org id=U59828.113563501010208
          (code U ref 59828); Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:18:08 UTC
Received: (at 59828-submitter) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2005 22:10:10 +0000
Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Er0Xh-0002eL-Ty; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:10:10 -0800
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44])
	by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0Xe-0006Ae-4u; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:10:06 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
	by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0XW-0003Eh-Gk; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:58 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1Er0XV-0002lN-PJ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 59828-submitter@bugs.debian.org
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2flpsnj8q8a.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.194, required 12,
	autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.81, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


The file README.Debian now lists .plan.day and not .pland, so this
part of the bug is fixed.  The other error might be fixed in version
1.9.  Please test and let me know if the problem is still there.  If
it isn't (or I do not hear anything for a few weeks), I'll close this
bug as resolved.




Received: (at 59828-submitter) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2005 22:10:10 +0000
From pre@saruman.uio.no Mon Dec 26 14:10:10 2005
Return-path: <pre@saruman.uio.no>
Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16] ident=7411)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Er0Xh-0002eL-Ty; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:10:10 -0800
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44])
	by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0Xe-0006Ae-4u; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:10:06 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
	by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Er0XW-0003Eh-Gk; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:58 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1Er0XV-0002lN-PJ; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
To: 59828-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 59828-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: plan: exit(0);doc vs. plan.dir; error on 29. March
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <2flpsnj8q8a.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.194, required 12,
	autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.81, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


The file README.Debian now lists .plan.day and not .pland, so this
part of the bug is fixed.  The other error might be fixed in version
1.9.  Please test and let me know if the problem is still there.  If
it isn't (or I do not hear anything for a few weeks), I'll close this
bug as resolved.