<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgSantiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Orignal-Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:49:24 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B.96342128522332@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.96342128522332
          (code B ref -1); Wed, 12 Jul 2000 20:49:24 GMT
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Attribution: drv
X-Url: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Web: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Home-Page: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
X-Face: |j}\)O|k##MrRz#VK$Jy=0r=3Qc,,a/Tr6*JQbE73dy17]<u3$*$]4O\1|h\|O\EDT9d$n+
 MTB{U&>2YcmW$9Z&H21e}#~#pgc>dn(is5Bv1l!{1re+Q9suKIOUmOqZs2>QMxHlR;;}kaGYA@HR3D
 C6
X-Face: 6o|eiKqaHN.ANh8HXDzntcWUOCg\]RsOd.ctvm~*y}Y^R&*a+Co,\s#=HWsw3x$b_n2kJ#g
 (7u?J^@^xP)f,jUF|0Z'J:|G/bMA5O12*b,7`-Q`=pKsCRIpso07.Y>YB2H{7`?u&yh;C_ZtLHfj<!
 $J=.i&Al'?,ax]MZd4tcm)_wF3$n*:f/lgS.;?Jr3T;Fl^q<qP**'tw
Date: 12 Jul 2000 18:57:21 +0200
Message-ID: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines: 62
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Molpe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


Package: procmail
Version: 3.15-0.0.pre

Distribution: debian woody
Uname -a: Linux uzeb 2.2.14 #1 Mon Apr 24 15:26:52 CEST 2000 i686 unknown


procmail is unable to acquire kernel locks, and blocks indefinitely when I
change the file to deliver. For instance, consider doing a simple
`cat <mail file> | procmail' in these two situations:

1/ procmailrc contains just VERBOSE=3Don
   The output is:

 ,----
| procmail: [1666] Wed Jul 12 18:48:10 2000
| procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
| procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=3D/var/spool/mail/didier"
| procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/didier"
| procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
| procmail: Unlocking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
| From didier@epita.fr Wed Jul 12 18:33:11 2000
|  Subject: test
|   Folder: /var/spool/mail/didier                                        1=
999
`-----

2/ Now, I add "DEFAULT=3D.mbox" in procmailrc
  The output is:

 ,----
| procmail: [1690] Wed Jul 12 18:53:25 2000
| procmail: Locking ".mbox.lock"
| procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=3D.mbox"
| procmail: Opening ".mbox"
| procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
`-----

        and here, procmail is blocked. After Control-C:

 ,----
| procmail: [1692] Wed Jul 12 18:53:50 2000
| procmail: Terminating prematurely whilst waiting for a kernel-lock
| From didier@epita.fr Wed Jul 12 18:33:11 2000
|  Subject: test
|   Folder: **Bounced**                                                    =
  0
| procmail: Unlocking ".mbox.lock"
`-----


        I seem to remember that some months ago, I used to get "kernel-lock
failed"  messages in the same conffiguration, but that was not causing a
hangup.


        Thanks for ideas.

--
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /        EPITA / LRDE         mailto:didier@lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /      14-16 rue Voltaire        Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
                   94276 Kremlin-Bic=EAtre cedex   Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Didier Verna &lt;didier@lrde.epita.fr&gt;</code>:<br>
New Bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Subject: Bug#67127: Acknowledgement (procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B.96342128522332.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
References: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 67127

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 67127@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2000 17:01:25 +0000
From didier@epita.fr Wed Jul 12 12:01:24 2000
Return-path: <didier@epita.fr>
Received: from hermes.epita.fr [194.98.116.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13CPsu-0005Vq-00; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 12:01:21 -0500
Received: from goa.lrde.epita.fr (mail@goa.lrde.epita.fr [10.227.5.2])
	by hermes.epita.fr id SAA14630 for <submit@bugs.debian.org> 
	EPITA Paris France Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:58:17 GMT
Received: from uzeb.lrde.epita.fr ([10.227.5.53] ident=mail)
	by goa.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13CPp7-0000O0-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:57:25 +0200
Received: from didier by uzeb.lrde.epita.fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13CPp3-0000RN-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:57:21 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
X-Attribution: drv
X-Url: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Web: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Home-Page: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
X-Face: |j}\)O|k##MrRz#VK$Jy=0r=3Qc,,a/Tr6*JQbE73dy17]<u3$*$]4O\1|h\|O\EDT9d$n+
 MTB{U&>2YcmW$9Z&H21e}#~#pgc>dn(is5Bv1l!{1re+Q9suKIOUmOqZs2>QMxHlR;;}kaGYA@HR3D
 C6
X-Face: 6o|eiKqaHN.ANh8HXDzntcWUOCg\]RsOd.ctvm~*y}Y^R&*a+Co,\s#=HWsw3x$b_n2kJ#g
 (7u?J^@^xP)f,jUF|0Z'J:|G/bMA5O12*b,7`-Q`=pKsCRIpso07.Y>YB2H{7`?u&yh;C_ZtLHfj<!
 $J=.i&Al'?,ax]MZd4tcm)_wF3$n*:f/lgS.;?Jr3T;Fl^q<qP**'tw
Date: 12 Jul 2000 18:57:21 +0200
Message-ID: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines: 62
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Molpe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


Package: procmail
Version: 3.15-0.0.pre

Distribution: debian woody
Uname -a: Linux uzeb 2.2.14 #1 Mon Apr 24 15:26:52 CEST 2000 i686 unknown


procmail is unable to acquire kernel locks, and blocks indefinitely when I
change the file to deliver. For instance, consider doing a simple
`cat <mail file> | procmail' in these two situations:

1/ procmailrc contains just VERBOSE=3Don
   The output is:

 ,----
| procmail: [1666] Wed Jul 12 18:48:10 2000
| procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
| procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=3D/var/spool/mail/didier"
| procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/didier"
| procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
| procmail: Unlocking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
| From didier@epita.fr Wed Jul 12 18:33:11 2000
|  Subject: test
|   Folder: /var/spool/mail/didier                                        1=
999
`-----

2/ Now, I add "DEFAULT=3D.mbox" in procmailrc
  The output is:

 ,----
| procmail: [1690] Wed Jul 12 18:53:25 2000
| procmail: Locking ".mbox.lock"
| procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=3D.mbox"
| procmail: Opening ".mbox"
| procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
`-----

        and here, procmail is blocked. After Control-C:

 ,----
| procmail: [1692] Wed Jul 12 18:53:50 2000
| procmail: Terminating prematurely whilst waiting for a kernel-lock
| From didier@epita.fr Wed Jul 12 18:33:11 2000
|  Subject: test
|   Folder: **Bounced**                                                    =
  0
| procmail: Unlocking ".mbox.lock"
`-----


        I seem to remember that some months ago, I used to get "kernel-lock
failed"  messages in the same conffiguration, but that was not causing a
hangup.


        Thanks for ideas.

--
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /        EPITA / LRDE         mailto:didier@lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /      14-16 rue Voltaire        Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
                   94276 Kremlin-Bic=EAtre cedex   Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgSantiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:49:14 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96348438118293@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 67127-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B67127.96348438118293
          (code B ref 67127); Thu, 13 Jul 2000 10:49:14 GMT
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:24:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000713122044.6911C-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On 12 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:

> Package: procmail
> Version: 3.15-0.0.pre
> 
> Distribution: debian woody
> Uname -a: Linux uzeb 2.2.14 #1 Mon Apr 24 15:26:52 CEST 2000 i686 unknown
> 
> 
> procmail is unable to acquire kernel locks, and blocks indefinitely when I
> change the file to deliver. For instance, consider doing a simple
> `cat <mail file> | procmail' in these two situations:
> 
> 1/ procmailrc contains just VERBOSE=on
>    The output is:
> 
>  ,----
> | procmail: [1666] Wed Jul 12 18:48:10 2000
> | procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
> | procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/didier"
> | procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/didier"
> | procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
> | procmail: Unlocking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
> | From didier@epita.fr Wed Jul 12 18:33:11 2000
> |  Subject: test
> |   Folder: /var/spool/mail/didier                                        1999
> `-----
> 
> 2/ Now, I add "DEFAULT=.mbox" in procmailrc
>   The output is:
> 
>  ,----
> | procmail: [1690] Wed Jul 12 18:53:25 2000
> | procmail: Locking ".mbox.lock"
> | procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=.mbox"
> | procmail: Opening ".mbox"
> | procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
> `-----
> 
>         and here, procmail is blocked. After Control-C:

I can't reproduce this on my system, which is a pure potato system running
Linux 2.2.15 + procmail_3.15-0.0.pre.

I would suggest a kernel upgrade.





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Subject: Bug#67127: Info received (was Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96348438118293.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000713122044.6911C-100000@cantor.unex.es>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000713122044.6911C-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 67127

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 67127@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 67127) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2000 10:33:01 +0000
From sanvila@unex.es Thu Jul 13 05:33:01 2000
Return-path: <sanvila@unex.es>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13CgGi-0004dI-00; Thu, 13 Jul 2000 05:33:01 -0500
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA21904;
	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:27:31 +0200
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105])
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA13134;
	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:27:31 +0200
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:24:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
In-Reply-To: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000713122044.6911C-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On 12 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:

> Package: procmail
> Version: 3.15-0.0.pre
> 
> Distribution: debian woody
> Uname -a: Linux uzeb 2.2.14 #1 Mon Apr 24 15:26:52 CEST 2000 i686 unknown
> 
> 
> procmail is unable to acquire kernel locks, and blocks indefinitely when I
> change the file to deliver. For instance, consider doing a simple
> `cat <mail file> | procmail' in these two situations:
> 
> 1/ procmailrc contains just VERBOSE=on
>    The output is:
> 
>  ,----
> | procmail: [1666] Wed Jul 12 18:48:10 2000
> | procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
> | procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/didier"
> | procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/didier"
> | procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
> | procmail: Unlocking "/var/spool/mail/didier.lock"
> | From didier@epita.fr Wed Jul 12 18:33:11 2000
> |  Subject: test
> |   Folder: /var/spool/mail/didier                                        1999
> `-----
> 
> 2/ Now, I add "DEFAULT=.mbox" in procmailrc
>   The output is:
> 
>  ,----
> | procmail: [1690] Wed Jul 12 18:53:25 2000
> | procmail: Locking ".mbox.lock"
> | procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=.mbox"
> | procmail: Opening ".mbox"
> | procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
> `-----
> 
>         and here, procmail is blocked. After Control-C:

I can't reproduce this on my system, which is a pure potato system running
Linux 2.2.15 + procmail_3.15-0.0.pre.

I would suggest a kernel upgrade.





<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgSantiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Orignal-Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:18:00 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.9638174652265@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 67127-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B67127.9638174652265
          (code B ref 67127); Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:18:00 GMT
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: 67127@bugs.debian.org
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000713122044.6911C-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Attribution: drv
X-Url: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Web: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Home-Page: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
In-Reply-To: Santiago Vila's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:24:26 +0200 (CEST)"
X-Face: |j}\)O|k##MrRz#VK$Jy=0r=3Qc,,a/Tr6*JQbE73dy17]<u3$*$]4O\1|h\|O\EDT9d$n+
 MTB{U&>2YcmW$9Z&H21e}#~#pgc>dn(is5Bv1l!{1re+Q9suKIOUmOqZs2>QMxHlR;;}kaGYA@HR3D
 C6
X-Face: 6o|eiKqaHN.ANh8HXDzntcWUOCg\]RsOd.ctvm~*y}Y^R&*a+Co,\s#=HWsw3x$b_n2kJ#g
 (7u?J^@^xP)f,jUF|0Z'J:|G/bMA5O12*b,7`-Q`=pKsCRIpso07.Y>YB2H{7`?u&yh;C_ZtLHfj<!
 $J=.i&Al'?,ax]MZd4tcm)_wF3$n*:f/lgS.;?Jr3T;Fl^q<qP**'tw
Date: 17 Jul 2000 09:03:57 +0200
Message-ID: <muxd7kdkzky.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Molpe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:

> I can't reproduce this on my system, which is a pure potato system running
> Linux 2.2.15 + procmail_3.15-0.0.pre.
>=20
> I would suggest a kernel upgrade.

        OK, I'll try that. Since I recompile my kernels, would you be aware=
 of
any option that might be related to this problem ?

--=20
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /        EPITA / LRDE         mailto:didier@lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /      14-16 rue Voltaire        Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
                   94276 Kremlin-Bic=EAtre cedex   Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Didier Verna &lt;didier@lrde.epita.fr&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Subject: Bug#67127: Info received (was Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.9638174652265.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <muxd7kdkzky.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
References: <muxd7kdkzky.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 67127

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 67127@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 67127) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2000 07:04:25 +0000
From didier@epita.fr Mon Jul 17 02:04:25 2000
Return-path: <didier@epita.fr>
Received: from hermes.epita.fr [194.98.116.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13E4wy-0000a3-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 02:04:25 -0500
Received: from goa.lrde.epita.fr (mail@goa.lrde.epita.fr [10.227.5.2])
	by hermes.epita.fr id JAA23607
	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:04:45 GMT
Received: from uzeb.lrde.epita.fr ([10.227.5.53] ident=mail)
	by goa.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13E4wX-0002b8-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:03:57 +0200
Received: from didier by uzeb.lrde.epita.fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13E4wX-0003fz-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:03:57 +0200
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: 67127@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000713122044.6911C-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Attribution: drv
X-Url: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Web: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Home-Page: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
In-Reply-To: Santiago Vila's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:24:26 +0200 (CEST)"
X-Face: |j}\)O|k##MrRz#VK$Jy=0r=3Qc,,a/Tr6*JQbE73dy17]<u3$*$]4O\1|h\|O\EDT9d$n+
 MTB{U&>2YcmW$9Z&H21e}#~#pgc>dn(is5Bv1l!{1re+Q9suKIOUmOqZs2>QMxHlR;;}kaGYA@HR3D
 C6
X-Face: 6o|eiKqaHN.ANh8HXDzntcWUOCg\]RsOd.ctvm~*y}Y^R&*a+Co,\s#=HWsw3x$b_n2kJ#g
 (7u?J^@^xP)f,jUF|0Z'J:|G/bMA5O12*b,7`-Q`=pKsCRIpso07.Y>YB2H{7`?u&yh;C_ZtLHfj<!
 $J=.i&Al'?,ax]MZd4tcm)_wF3$n*:f/lgS.;?Jr3T;Fl^q<qP**'tw
Date: 17 Jul 2000 09:03:57 +0200
Message-ID: <muxd7kdkzky.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Molpe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:

> I can't reproduce this on my system, which is a pure potato system running
> Linux 2.2.15 + procmail_3.15-0.0.pre.
>=20
> I would suggest a kernel upgrade.

        OK, I'll try that. Since I recompile my kernels, would you be aware=
 of
any option that might be related to this problem ?

--=20
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /        EPITA / LRDE         mailto:didier@lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /      14-16 rue Voltaire        Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
                   94276 Kremlin-Bic=EAtre cedex   Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgSantiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:03:36 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96382049216646@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 67127-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B67127.96382049216646
          (code B ref 67127); Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:03:36 GMT
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:54:46 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Cc: 67127@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20000717085446.A22315@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
References: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr> <20000713011119.D5094@tardis.ed.ac.uk> <muxitu5kzmy.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i
In-Reply-To: <muxitu5kzmy.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>; from Didier Verna on Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:02:45AM +0200
X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:02:45AM +0200, Didier Verna wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> > Are you delivering to NFS directories?

>         Yes, my account is mounted from another machine.

That may well be the problem - file locking doesn't work over NFS on
Linux.

-- 
Mark Brown  mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
            http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFS        http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Mark Brown &lt;broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Subject: Bug#67127: Info received (was Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96382049216646.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000717085446.A22315@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
References: <20000717085446.A22315@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 67127

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 67127@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 67127) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2000 07:54:52 +0000
From broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk Mon Jul 17 02:54:52 2000
Return-path: <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Received: from master.tardis.ed.ac.uk [193.62.81.6] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13E5jo-0004KC-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 02:54:52 -0500
Received: from tardis.tardis.ed.ac.uk (tardis.tardis.ed.ac.uk [193.62.81.1])
	by master.tardis.ed.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 426402F802; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:54:48 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from broonie@localhost)
	by tardis.tardis.ed.ac.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.7/TardisClientv2) id IAA22322;
	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:54:46 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 08:54:46 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Cc: 67127@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Message-ID: <20000717085446.A22315@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
References: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr> <20000713011119.D5094@tardis.ed.ac.uk> <muxitu5kzmy.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i
In-Reply-To: <muxitu5kzmy.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>; from Didier Verna on Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:02:45AM +0200
X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:02:45AM +0200, Didier Verna wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> > Are you delivering to NFS directories?

>         Yes, my account is mounted from another machine.

That may well be the problem - file locking doesn't work over NFS on
Linux.

-- 
Mark Brown  mailto:broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
            http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFS        http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Orignal-Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:03:28 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96383514724453@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 67127-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B67127.96383514724453
          (code B ref 67127); Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:03:28 GMT
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
X-Sender: sanvila@cantor.unex.es
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <muxd7kdkzky.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135005.6794A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On 17 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:

> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:
> 
> > I can't reproduce this on my system, which is a pure potato system running
> > Linux 2.2.15 + procmail_3.15-0.0.pre.
> > 
> > I would suggest a kernel upgrade.
> 
>    OK, I'll try that. Since I recompile my kernels, would you be aware of
> any option that might be related to this problem ?

I think this bug may be related to a known kernel bug regarding suid
binaries, so it's very unlikely that you need a special option for that.

I think that the current procmail snapshot has a workaround for this
bug, if you can wait a day or two without upgrading the kernel, we can
test Linux 2.2.14 + new procmail to see whether it fixes the problem
or not.





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Subject: Bug#67127: Info received (was Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96383514724453.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135005.6794A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135005.6794A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 67127

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 67127@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 67127) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2000 11:59:07 +0000
From sanvila@cantor.unex.es Mon Jul 17 06:59:07 2000
Return-path: <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Received: from cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13E9YA-0006LT-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 06:59:07 -0500
Received: from sanvila (helo=localhost)
	by cantor.unex.es with local-smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13E9UQ-0001le-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:55:14 +0200
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
X-Sender: sanvila@cantor.unex.es
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
In-Reply-To: <muxd7kdkzky.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135005.6794A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On 17 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:

> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:
> 
> > I can't reproduce this on my system, which is a pure potato system running
> > Linux 2.2.15 + procmail_3.15-0.0.pre.
> > 
> > I would suggest a kernel upgrade.
> 
>    OK, I'll try that. Since I recompile my kernels, would you be aware of
> any option that might be related to this problem ?

I think this bug may be related to a known kernel bug regarding suid
binaries, so it's very unlikely that you need a special option for that.

I think that the current procmail snapshot has a workaround for this
bug, if you can wait a day or two without upgrading the kernel, we can
test Linux 2.2.14 + new procmail to see whether it fixes the problem
or not.





<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Orignal-Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:03:51 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96383529025242@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 67127-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B67127.96383529025242
          (code B ref 67127); Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:03:51 GMT
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
X-Sender: sanvila@cantor.unex.es
To: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
cc: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20000717085446.A22315@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135532.6794B-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:02:45AM +0200, Didier Verna wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > > Are you delivering to NFS directories?
> 
> >         Yes, my account is mounted from another machine.
> 
> That may well be the problem - file locking doesn't work over NFS on
> Linux.

If you have problems with NFS I would recommend using Maildir folders
and procmail from woody, which is known not to need any locking at all
when delivering to Maildir folders.





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@ctv.es&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
Subject: Bug#67127: Info received (was Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96383529025242.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135532.6794B-100000@cantor.unex.es>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135532.6794B-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 67127

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 67127@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 67127) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2000 12:01:30 +0000
From sanvila@cantor.unex.es Mon Jul 17 07:01:30 2000
Return-path: <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Received: from cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13E9aT-0006Yk-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:01:30 -0500
Received: from sanvila (helo=localhost)
	by cantor.unex.es with local-smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13E9XC-0001lx-00; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:58:06 +0200
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@ctv.es>
X-Sender: sanvila@cantor.unex.es
To: Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
cc: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
In-Reply-To: <20000717085446.A22315@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000717135532.6794B-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:02:45AM +0200, Didier Verna wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > > Are you delivering to NFS directories?
> 
> >         Yes, my account is mounted from another machine.
> 
> That may well be the problem - file locking doesn't work over NFS on
> Linux.

If you have problems with NFS I would recommend using Maildir folders
and procmail from woody, which is known not to need any locking at all
when delivering to Maildir folders.





<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgSantiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Orignal-Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:48:38 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.9640033611167@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 67127-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B67127.9640033611167
          (code B ref 67127); Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:48:38 GMT
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000719122851.7472A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On 12 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:

> Package: procmail
> Version: 3.15-0.0.pre

Do you still reproduce this with 3.15-0.1.pre? (now in woody)





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Subject: Bug#67127: Info received (was Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.9640033611167.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000719122851.7472A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000719122851.7472A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 67127

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 67127@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 67127) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2000 10:42:41 +0000
From sanvila@cantor.unex.es Wed Jul 19 05:42:41 2000
Return-path: <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Received: from cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13ErJI-0000IZ-00; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 05:42:41 -0500
Received: from sanvila (helo=localhost)
	by cantor.unex.es with local-smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13Er72-0001wd-00; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:30:00 +0200
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:29:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
In-Reply-To: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000719122851.7472A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Santiago Vila <sanvila@cantor.unex.es>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

On 12 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:

> Package: procmail
> Version: 3.15-0.0.pre

Do you still reproduce this with 3.15-0.1.pre? (now in woody)





<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#67127</code>; Package <code>procmail</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgSantiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
Reply-To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>, 67127@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Orignal-Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 08:58:57 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96537830614058@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 67127
X-Debian-PR-Package: procmail
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 67127-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B67127.96537830614058
          (code B ref 67127); Fri, 04 Aug 2000 08:58:57 GMT
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: 67127@bugs.debian.org
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000719122851.7472A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Attribution: drv
X-Url: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Web: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Home-Page: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
In-Reply-To: Santiago Vila's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:29:59 +0200 (CEST)"
X-Face: |j}\)O|k##MrRz#VK$Jy=0r=3Qc,,a/Tr6*JQbE73dy17]<u3$*$]4O\1|h\|O\EDT9d$n+
 MTB{U&>2YcmW$9Z&H21e}#~#pgc>dn(is5Bv1l!{1re+Q9suKIOUmOqZs2>QMxHlR;;}kaGYA@HR3D
 C6
X-Face: 6o|eiKqaHN.ANh8HXDzntcWUOCg\]RsOd.ctvm~*y}Y^R&*a+Co,\s#=HWsw3x$b_n2kJ#g
 (7u?J^@^xP)f,jUF|0Z'J:|G/bMA5O12*b,7`-Q`=pKsCRIpso07.Y>YB2H{7`?u&yh;C_ZtLHfj<!
 $J=.i&Al'?,ax]MZd4tcm)_wF3$n*:f/lgS.;?Jr3T;Fl^q<qP**'tw
Date: 04 Aug 2000 10:37:32 +0200
Message-ID: <muxwvhxs9pv.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Nike)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:

> On 12 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:
>=20
> > Package: procmail
> > Version: 3.15-0.0.pre
>=20
> Do you still reproduce this with 3.15-0.1.pre? (now in woody)

        Hi Santiago,

Sorry for the late reply. After doing the same test as in my first report, =
it
appears that procmail doesn't block anymore. BTW, it still says "Kernel-Lock
failed", but it is not blocked.

        I guess that closes this bug report thread.

Thanks!

--=20
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /        EPITA / LRDE         mailto:didier@lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /      14-16 rue Voltaire        Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
                   94276 Kremlin-Bic=EAtre cedex   Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Didier Verna &lt;didier@lrde.epita.fr&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
Subject: Bug#67127: Info received (was Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock)
Message-ID: <handler.67127.B67127.96537830614058.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <muxwvhxs9pv.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
References: <muxwvhxs9pv.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 67127

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 67127@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 67127) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2000 08:38:26 +0000
From didier@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr Fri Aug 04 03:38:26 2000
Return-path: <didier@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Received: from hermes.epita.fr [194.98.116.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13Kczp-0003eX-00; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 03:38:25 -0500
Received: from goa.lrde.epita.fr (mail@goa.lrde.epita.fr [10.227.5.2])
	by hermes.epita.fr id KAA25499
	Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:38:53 GMT
Received: from uzeb.lrde.epita.fr ([10.227.5.53] ident=mail)
	by goa.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13Kcyz-0005xi-00; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 10:37:33 +0200
Received: from didier by uzeb.lrde.epita.fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 13Kcyz-0007b3-00; Fri, 04 Aug 2000 10:37:33 +0200
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: 67127@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail blocks when acquiring a kernel lock
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000719122851.7472A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
X-Attribution: drv
X-Url: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Web: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
X-Home-Page: http://www.infres.enst.fr/~verna
From: Didier Verna <didier@lrde.epita.fr>
In-Reply-To: Santiago Vila's message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:29:59 +0200 (CEST)"
X-Face: |j}\)O|k##MrRz#VK$Jy=0r=3Qc,,a/Tr6*JQbE73dy17]<u3$*$]4O\1|h\|O\EDT9d$n+
 MTB{U&>2YcmW$9Z&H21e}#~#pgc>dn(is5Bv1l!{1re+Q9suKIOUmOqZs2>QMxHlR;;}kaGYA@HR3D
 C6
X-Face: 6o|eiKqaHN.ANh8HXDzntcWUOCg\]RsOd.ctvm~*y}Y^R&*a+Co,\s#=HWsw3x$b_n2kJ#g
 (7u?J^@^xP)f,jUF|0Z'J:|G/bMA5O12*b,7`-Q`=pKsCRIpso07.Y>YB2H{7`?u&yh;C_ZtLHfj<!
 $J=.i&Al'?,ax]MZd4tcm)_wF3$n*:f/lgS.;?Jr3T;Fl^q<qP**'tw
Date: 04 Aug 2000 10:37:32 +0200
Message-ID: <muxwvhxs9pv.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.2 (Nike)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Didier Verna <didier@epita.fr>
Delivered-To: 67127@bugs.debian.org

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:

> On 12 Jul 2000, Didier Verna wrote:
>=20
> > Package: procmail
> > Version: 3.15-0.0.pre
>=20
> Do you still reproduce this with 3.15-0.1.pre? (now in woody)

        Hi Santiago,

Sorry for the late reply. After doing the same test as in my first report, =
it
appears that procmail doesn't block anymore. BTW, it still says "Kernel-Lock
failed", but it is not blocked.

        I guess that closes this bug report thread.

Thanks!

--=20
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /        EPITA / LRDE         mailto:didier@lrde.epita.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /      14-16 rue Voltaire        Tel. +33 (1) 44 08 01 77
                   94276 Kremlin-Bic=EAtre cedex   Fax. +33 (1) 44 08 01 99




<strong>Changed Bug title.</strong>
Request was from <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2001 16:33:36 +0000
From sanvila@unex.es Sat Jan 13 10:33:35 2001
Return-path: <sanvila@unex.es>
Received: from (smtp.wanadoo.es) [62.36.220.63] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14HTcU-0002IS-00; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:33:34 -0600
Received: from jump.micasa.es (usuario2-37-76-43.dialup.uni2.es [62.37.76.43])
	by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0DGWOi09024;
	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:32:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: from sanvila (helo=localhost)
	by jump.micasa.es with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14HTZE-0001H9-00; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:30:12 +0100
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:30:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
X-X-Sender:  <sanvila@jump.micasa.es>
To: Philip Guenther <guenther@gac.edu>
cc: <67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail can't create mail spool file under NFS
In-Reply-To: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101131706330.4833-100000@jump.micasa.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

retitle 67127 procmail is unable to create mail spool file under NFS.
stop

I have made some tests with procmail and NFS, and it seems that
procmail is unable to create a mail spool file if the spool directory
is mounted via NFS.

In my test system procmail is compiled to deliver to /var/spool/mail/<user>.
/var/spool/mail is a symlink to /var/mail, and /var/mail is NFS
mounted from /varmail. The command

cat message | procmail

fails with this error

procmail: Couldn't create "/var/spool/mail/bluser"

if /varmail/bluser does not exist, but it succeeds if /varmail/bluser
already exists. In the first case I found the following in the log file:

procmail: [4900] Sat Jan 13 17:14:23 2001
procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/bluser.lock"
procmail: Error while writing to "/var/spool/mail/_kMB+e7HY6.jump"
procmail: Lock failure on "/var/spool/mail/bluser.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/bluser"
procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/bluser"
procmail: Error while writing to "/var/spool/mail/bluser"
From testing@micasa.es Sat Jan 13 17:02:26 2001
 Subject: The subject.
  Folder: **Bounced**                                                         0
procmail: Notified comsat: "bluser@:**Bounced**"

Perhaps this is related to Bug#46598, "procmail wants to create
/var/spool/mail/* files"?

Is this a bug in procmail or it is maybe a limitation of NFS?

[ I can understand procmail having difficulties to use its root
privileges to create files in the spool directory, because NFS
translates root into nobody, but it could yet use its set-gid mail
privileges for this, since the spool directory is group-writable by
group mail ].

Thanks.





<strong>Reply sent</strong> to <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>:<br>
You have marked Bug as forwarded.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Bcc: debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#67127: marked as forwarded (procmail is unable to create mail spool file under NFS.)
Message-ID: <header.67127.F67127.9794036158924.ackfwdd@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101131706330.4833-100000@jump.micasa.es>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101131706330.4833-100000@jump.micasa.es> <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
X-Debian-PR-Message: forwarded 67127

Your message dated Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:30:12 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101131706330.4833-100000@jump.micasa.es>
has caused the Debian Bug report #67127,
regarding procmail is unable to create mail spool file under NFS.
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Philip Guenther <guenther@gac.edu>.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)




Received: (at 67127-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2001 16:33:35 +0000
From sanvila@unex.es Sat Jan 13 10:33:35 2001
Return-path: <sanvila@unex.es>
Received: from (smtp.wanadoo.es) [62.36.220.63] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14HTcU-0002IS-00; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:33:34 -0600
Received: from jump.micasa.es (usuario2-37-76-43.dialup.uni2.es [62.37.76.43])
	by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0DGWOi09024;
	Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:32:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: from sanvila (helo=localhost)
	by jump.micasa.es with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14HTZE-0001H9-00; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:30:12 +0100
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:30:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
X-X-Sender:  <sanvila@jump.micasa.es>
To: Philip Guenther <guenther@gac.edu>
cc: <67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail can't create mail spool file under NFS
In-Reply-To: <muxr98znv66.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101131706330.4833-100000@jump.micasa.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org

retitle 67127 procmail is unable to create mail spool file under NFS.
stop

I have made some tests with procmail and NFS, and it seems that
procmail is unable to create a mail spool file if the spool directory
is mounted via NFS.

In my test system procmail is compiled to deliver to /var/spool/mail/<user>.
/var/spool/mail is a symlink to /var/mail, and /var/mail is NFS
mounted from /varmail. The command

cat message | procmail

fails with this error

procmail: Couldn't create "/var/spool/mail/bluser"

if /varmail/bluser does not exist, but it succeeds if /varmail/bluser
already exists. In the first case I found the following in the log file:

procmail: [4900] Sat Jan 13 17:14:23 2001
procmail: Locking "/var/spool/mail/bluser.lock"
procmail: Error while writing to "/var/spool/mail/_kMB+e7HY6.jump"
procmail: Lock failure on "/var/spool/mail/bluser.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/var/spool/mail/bluser"
procmail: Opening "/var/spool/mail/bluser"
procmail: Error while writing to "/var/spool/mail/bluser"
From testing@micasa.es Sat Jan 13 17:02:26 2001
 Subject: The subject.
  Folder: **Bounced**                                                         0
procmail: Notified comsat: "bluser@:**Bounced**"

Perhaps this is related to Bug#46598, "procmail wants to create
/var/spool/mail/* files"?

Is this a bug in procmail or it is maybe a limitation of NFS?

[ I can understand procmail having difficulties to use its root
privileges to create files in the spool directory, because NFS
translates root into nobody, but it could yet use its set-gid mail
privileges for this, since the spool directory is group-writable by
group mail ].

Thanks.





Received: (at 67127-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2001 17:12:30 +0000
From guenther@gac.edu Mon Jan 15 11:12:30 2001
Return-path: <guenther@gac.edu>
Received: from callisto.gac.edu [138.236.128.19] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14IDBF-0001xv-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:12:29 -0600
Received: from solen.gac.edu (root@solen.gac.edu [138.236.128.18])
	by callisto.gac.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/1.0) with ESMTP id f0FHCQh17204;
	Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:12:26 -0600
Received: from gac.edu (guenther@solen.gac.edu [138.236.128.18])
	by solen.gac.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/GAC-HUB-2.43) with ESMTP id LAA08936;
	Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:12:25 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <200101151712.LAA08936@solen.gac.edu>
To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: 67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail can't create mail spool file under NFS 
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101131706330.4833-100000@jump.micasa.es> 
References: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101131706330.4833-100000@jump.micasa.es> 
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:12:25 -0600
From: Philip Guenther <guenther@gac.edu>
Delivered-To: 67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
>retitle 67127 procmail is unable to create mail spool file under NFS.
>stop
>
>I have made some tests with procmail and NFS, and it seems that
>procmail is unable to create a mail spool file if the spool directory
>is mounted via NFS.

When procmail was compiled for the various binaries involved in the bug
report, was it given a set of LOCKINGTEST directories that included an
NFS mounted one, or was LOCKINGTEST set to a value *known* to be safe
with NFS mounted files?


Philip Guenther
Procmail Maintainer




Received: (at 67127-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2001 18:06:17 +0000
From sanvila@unex.es Mon Jan 15 12:06:17 2001
Return-path: <sanvila@unex.es>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14IE1I-0006Xq-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:06:16 -0600
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (sanvila@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08586;
	Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:06:14 +0100
Received: from localhost (sanvila@localhost)
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id TAA29369;
	Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:06:13 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: guadiana.unex.es: sanvila owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:06:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: Philip Guenther <guenther@gac.edu>
cc: 67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#67127: procmail can't create mail spool file under NFS 
In-Reply-To: <200101151712.LAA08936@solen.gac.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010115190232.29183A-100000@guadiana.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org

On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Philip Guenther wrote:

> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> >retitle 67127 procmail is unable to create mail spool file under NFS.
> >stop
> >
> >I have made some tests with procmail and NFS, and it seems that
> >procmail is unable to create a mail spool file if the spool directory
> >is mounted via NFS.
> 
> When procmail was compiled for the various binaries involved in the bug
> report, was it given a set of LOCKINGTEST directories that included an
> NFS mounted one, or was LOCKINGTEST set to a value *known* to be safe
> with NFS mounted files?

It was set to LOCKINGTEST=100 so that it uses a combination of fcntl()
and dot locking (which, under Linux, is supposed to be the right thing).





<strong>Tags added: upstream</strong>
Request was from <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2002 09:22:37 +0000
From sanvila@unex.es Thu Jul 11 04:22:37 2002
Return-path: <sanvila@unex.es>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17Sa9j-0005K4-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 04:22:36 -0500
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA07114
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:22:34 +0200
Received: from cantor.unex.es (cantor.unex.es [158.49.18.105])
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA10975
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:22:34 +0200
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:22:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tags
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207111118090.8560-314159@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

tags 46598 upstream
tags 67127 upstream
tags 108044 upstream
tags 128160 upstream
tags 151627 upstream
tags 107874 upstream
tags 147173 upstream
tags 42280 upstream
thanks





Received: (at 67127-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2008 15:57:03 +0000
From INFO@UPGRADE.COM Mon Oct 13 15:57:03 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
	(2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.4479 Tokens: new, 66; hammy, 49; neutral, 50; spammy,
	12. spammytokens:1.000-1--sk:account, 1.000-1--UD:To, 1.000-1--CONFIRM,
	0.998-1--H*F:U*INFO, 0.998-1--H*rp:U*INFO
	hammytokens:0.002-+--HContent-Disposition:inline, 0.006-+--Owner,
	0.006-+--username, 0.008-+--upgrading, 0.009-+--H*RU:127.0.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FOURLA
	autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <INFO@UPGRADE.COM>
Received: from mail.su.ac.th ([202.44.135.29])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <INFO@UPGRADE.COM>)
	id 1KpPn4-0007yh-TA
	for 67127-forwarded@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:57:03 +0000
Received: from localhost (maprang.su.ac.th [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.su.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2092A3A4243;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:56:54 +0700 (ICT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at su.ac.th
Received: from mail.su.ac.th ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (maprang.su.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 5sVZW4Zz4Pms; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:56:53 +0700 (ICT)
Received: from su.ac.th (webmail.su.ac.th [202.44.135.24])
	by mail.su.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15FF3A41F5;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:56:51 +0700 (ICT)
Received: from 64.110.78.22 ([64.110.78.22]) by webmail1.su.ac.th (Horde
	MIME library) with HTTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:56:51 +0700
Message-ID: <20081013225651.9hoqa831wck04o44@webmail1.su.ac.th>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:56:51 +0700
From: ACCOUNT UPGRADE <INFO@UPGRADE.COM>
Reply-to: account.upgrade08@live.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: Dear: Webmail account Owner.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=TIS-620;
	DelSp="Yes";
	format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3)
X-Originating-IP: 64.110.78.22



Dear: Webmail account Owner,

This message is from Webmail messaging center to all Webmail email account
owners.We are currently upgrading our data base and e-mail account center.We
are deleting all Webmail email account to create more space for new  
accounts.To
prevent your account from closing you will have to update it so that we will
know that it's a present used account. Your response should be sent to admin.

manager Email: account.upgrade08@live.com
***********************************************
CONFIRM YOUR EMAIL IDENTITY BELOW
Email Username :
Password :
Date of Birth :
Country or Territory :
************************************************
Thanks,2008. Webmail Team.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP : Silpakorn University Webmail