<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Avery Pennarun &lt;apenwarr@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#79826</code>; Package <code>apmd</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAvery Pennarun <apenwarr@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#79826: apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd
Reply-To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>, 79826@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 16:18:01 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.79826.B.97706933623795@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 79826
X-Debian-PR-Package: apmd
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.97706933623795
          (code B ref -1); Sun, 17 Dec 2000 16:18:01 GMT
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:38:14 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: apmd
Version: 3.0final-1
Severity: wishlist

I'd suggest to change that hwclock script to the one described
below, so ntpd doesn't get confused.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux sobolev 2.4.0-test11 #17 Sat Dec 16 20:26:05 CET 2000 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages apmd depends on:
ii  libc6          2.1.3-13       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  xlib6g         3.3.6-11potato shared libraries required by X clients

--- Begin /etc/apm/event.d/00hwclock (modified conffile)
#!/bin/sh
. /etc/default/rcS
if [ -n "$UTC$GMT" -a "$UTC" != "no" ]; then
	GMT="-u"
fi
if [ -x /sbin/clock ]; then
	CLOCK=clock
else
	CLOCK=hwclock
fi
if [ "$1" = suspend ]; then
	[ -x /etc/init.d/ntp ] && /etc/init.d/ntp stop
	$CLOCK -w $GMT
elif [ "$1" = resume ]; then
	$CLOCK -s $GMT
	[ -x /etc/init.d/ntp ] && /etc/init.d/ntp start
fi

--- End /etc/apm/event.d/00hwclock




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Thomas Roessler &lt;roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org&gt;</code>:<br>
New Bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>Avery Pennarun &lt;apenwarr@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Subject: Bug#79826: Acknowledgement (apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd)
Message-ID: <handler.79826.B.97706933623795.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
References: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 79826

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@debian.org>

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 79826@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2000 16:08:56 +0000
From roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org Sun Dec 17 10:08:56 2000
Return-path: <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Received: from mail.loop.de (mail.vi-internet.de) [195.182.114.102] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 147gMq-0006Bk-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:08:56 -0600
Received: from sobolev.does-not-exist.org ([62.180.210.16]) by mail.vi-internet.de  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);
	 Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:08:52 +0100
Received: by sobolev.does-not-exist.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DC5D52ED13; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:38:14 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Subject: apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:38:14 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: apmd
Version: 3.0final-1
Severity: wishlist

I'd suggest to change that hwclock script to the one described
below, so ntpd doesn't get confused.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux sobolev 2.4.0-test11 #17 Sat Dec 16 20:26:05 CET 2000 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages apmd depends on:
ii  libc6          2.1.3-13       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  xlib6g         3.3.6-11potato shared libraries required by X clients

--- Begin /etc/apm/event.d/00hwclock (modified conffile)
#!/bin/sh
. /etc/default/rcS
if [ -n "$UTC$GMT" -a "$UTC" != "no" ]; then
	GMT="-u"
fi
if [ -x /sbin/clock ]; then
	CLOCK=clock
else
	CLOCK=hwclock
fi
if [ "$1" = suspend ]; then
	[ -x /etc/init.d/ntp ] && /etc/init.d/ntp stop
	$CLOCK -w $GMT
elif [ "$1" = resume ]; then
	$CLOCK -s $GMT
	[ -x /etc/init.d/ntp ] && /etc/init.d/ntp start
fi

--- End /etc/apm/event.d/00hwclock




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Avery Pennarun &lt;apenwarr@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#79826</code>; Package <code>apmd</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAvery Pennarun <apenwarr@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#79826: apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd
Reply-To: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>, 79826@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:48:53 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.79826.B79826.97709997527359@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 79826
X-Debian-PR-Package: apmd
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 79826-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B79826.97709997527359
          (code B ref 79826); Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:48:53 GMT
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 16:39:39 -0800
From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>
To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>,
  79826@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20001217163939.A5057@worldvisions.ca>
References: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>; from roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 08:38:14PM +0100
Delivered-To: 79826@bugs.debian.org

On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 08:38:14PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> I'd suggest to change that hwclock script to the one described
> below, so ntpd doesn't get confused.

I think it would be better to have ntpd install its own script in
/etc/apm.d/event.d.

Thanks,

Avery




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Avery Pennarun &lt;apenwarr@worldvisions.ca&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Avery Pennarun &lt;apenwarr@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>
Subject: Bug#79826: Info received (was Bug#79826: apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd)
Message-ID: <handler.79826.B79826.97709997527359.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20001217163939.A5057@worldvisions.ca>
References: <20001217163939.A5057@worldvisions.ca>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 79826

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 79826@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 79826) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2000 00:39:35 +0000
From apenwarr@worldvisions.ca Sun Dec 17 18:39:34 2000
Return-path: <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>
Received: from (tangent.worldvisions.ca) [204.239.180.4] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 147oL0-00077D-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:39:34 -0600
Received: (qmail 5095 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Dec 2000 00:39:39 -0000
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 16:39:39 -0800
From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca>
To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>,
  79826@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#79826: apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd
Message-ID: <20001217163939.A5057@worldvisions.ca>
References: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <20001216193814.DC5D52ED13@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>; from roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 08:38:14PM +0100
Delivered-To: 79826@bugs.debian.org

On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 08:38:14PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> I'd suggest to change that hwclock script to the one described
> below, so ntpd doesn't get confused.

I think it would be better to have ntpd install its own script in
/etc/apm.d/event.d.

Thanks,

Avery




<strong>Bug reassigned from package `apmd' to `ntpd'.</strong>
Request was from <code>Thomas Hood &lt;jdthood@mail.com&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2001 20:27:54 +0000
From jdthood@mail.com Thu Nov 29 14:27:54 2001
Return-path: <jdthood@mail.com>
Received: from hermes.toad.net [162.33.130.251] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 169Xmk-0008Tg-00; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:27:54 -0600
Received: from core18d09.dynamic-dialup.toad.net (jdthood@core18d09.dynamic-dialup.toad.net [162.33.188.9])
	by hermes.toad.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fATKRr909174
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:27:53 -0500
Subject: 
From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@mail.com>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release)
Date: 29 Nov 2001 15:28:43 -0500
Message-Id: <1007065724.1895.23.camel@thanatos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

reassign 79826 ntpd






<strong>Bug reassigned from package `ntpd' to `ntp'.</strong>
Request was from <code>Colin Watson &lt;cjwatson@debian.org&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2001 04:27:59 +0000
From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Fri Nov 30 22:27:59 2001
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from gadolinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.111] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16A1kt-0006Sw-00; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 22:27:59 -0600
Received: from [217.35.29.15] (helo=arborlon.riva.ucam.org)
	by gadolinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
	id 16A1ks-00027b-00
	for control@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 04:27:58 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 16A1kT-0000YN-00
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 01 Dec 2001 04:27:33 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: reassign 79826 to ntp
Date: Sat,  1 Dec 2001 04:27:33 +0000
Message-Id: <E16A1kT-0000YN-00@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

reassign 79826 ntp





<strong>Message sent on</strong> to <code>Thomas Roessler &lt;roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org&gt;</code>:<br>
Bug#79826.


Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#79826: apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd
Reply-To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, 79826-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Resent-To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:09:04 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.79826.U79826.119763741532376@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 79826
X-Debian-PR-Package: ntp
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: ntp
Received: via spool by 79826-submitter@bugs.debian.org id=U79826.119763741532376
          (code U ref 79826); Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:09:04 +0000
Received: (at 79826-submitter) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2007 13:03:35 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(2006-07-26) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from gauss.credativ.com ([212.112.227.254])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <peter_e@gmx.net>)
	id 1J3ACV-0008MR-CU
	for 79826-submitter@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:03:35 +0000
Received: from hawking.credativ.lan (exit.credativ.com [87.139.82.80])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by gauss.credativ.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E682775B4
	for <79826-submitter@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:03:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: 79826-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:03:29 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200712141403.30338.peter_e@gmx.net>

Does anyone know what is going on with this bug?  Is apmd still relevant?  
What exactly is the "confusion" of ntpd that is being referred to?





Received: (at 79826-submitter) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2007 13:03:35 +0000
From peter_e@gmx.net Fri Dec 14 13:03:35 2007
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(2006-07-26) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <peter_e@gmx.net>
Received: from gauss.credativ.com ([212.112.227.254])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <peter_e@gmx.net>)
	id 1J3ACV-0008MR-CU
	for 79826-submitter@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:03:35 +0000
Received: from hawking.credativ.lan (exit.credativ.com [87.139.82.80])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by gauss.credativ.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E682775B4
	for <79826-submitter@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:03:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: 79826-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#79826: apmd: apmd's 00hwclock script should halt ntpd
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:03:29 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200712141403.30338.peter_e@gmx.net>

Does anyone know what is going on with this bug?  Is apmd still relevant?  
What exactly is the "confusion" of ntpd that is being referred to?