Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2001 19:52:27 +0000 From patrik@ein.cz Fri Feb 09 13:52:27 2001 Return-path: Received: from bay.ein.cz [::ffff:212.24.139.122] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14RJal-0000qF-00; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 13:52:27 -0600 Received: from eagle.int.ein.cz (eagle.int.ein.cz [192.168.3.129]) by bay.ein.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3547135C1 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:52:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from patrik (helo=localhost) by eagle.int.ein.cz with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 14RJaj-0002Uk-00 for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2001 20:52:25 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:52:25 +0100 (CET) From: Patrik Rak To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: openssh should adopt /etc/ssh-nonfree on upgrade Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: ssh Severity: wishlist It would be really nice if openssh would adopt the existing config and host key from /etc/ssh-nonfree. Regards, Patrik ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:04:44 +0100 From: Martin Schulze Reply-To: Martin Schulze To: Patrik Rak Subject: Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 027-1] New OpenSSH packages released Patrik Rak wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > Hmm, that's bad. Will you eventually release fixed deb for ssh-nonfree or > > > would you recommend switching to openssh? I remember I have decided to > > > > I would recommend switching to OpenSSH. It should be as good as the > > non-free ssh. I don't know if and when we will manage to cope with > > ssh-nonfree. I have not much desire and would rather work on other > > stuff instead. > > Hmm, I guess people would appreciate if the upgrade to openssh would use > their /etc/ssh-nonfree on upgrade for the key and config (in similar way > ssh-nonfree uses the /etc/ssh when installed). Any chance this gets > implemented? Could you file a bug to the appropriate package (either ssh-nonfree or openssh) Regards, Joey