Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>:
Bug#77324; Package dpkg.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgWichert Akkerman  Subject: Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies Reply-To: Adrian Bunk , 77324@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Adrian Bunk Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Wichert Akkerman Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:48:01 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 77324 X-Debian-PR-Package: dpkg X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.9745077542282 (code B ref -1); Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:48:01 GMT From: Adrian Bunk To: Debian Bug Tracking System X-Reportbug-Version: 1.3 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.3 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 01:35:53 +0100 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: dpkg Severity: wishlist After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to implement but I think this would be a useful feature.   Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Bug#77324: Acknowledgement (dpkg wish: conditional dependencies) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 77324 Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Wichert Akkerman If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 77324@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to bugs@bugs.debian.org). Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2000 00:35:54 +0000 From bunk@fs.tum.de Fri Nov 17 18:35:54 2000 Return-path: Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailhub.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 13wvz0-0000ai-00; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 18:35:54 -0600 Received: (qmail 2757 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2000 00:35:52 -0000 Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 18 Nov 2000 00:35:52 -0000 Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 13wvyz-0003fO-00; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 01:35:53 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies X-Reportbug-Version: 1.3 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.3 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 01:35:53 +0100 Message-Id: Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: dpkg Severity: wishlist After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to implement but I think this would be a useful feature.   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>:
Bug#77324; Package dpkg.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgWichert Akkerman  Subject: Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies Reply-To: Wichert Akkerman , 77324@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Wichert Akkerman Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Wichert Akkerman Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 01:03:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 77324 X-Debian-PR-Package: dpkg X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by 77324-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B77324.9745093558123 (code B ref 77324); Sat, 18 Nov 2000 01:03:02 GMT Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 02:02:33 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: Adrian Bunk , 77324@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 01:35:53AM +0100 Delivered-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org Previously Adrian Bunk wrote: > After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional > dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a > is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to > implement but I think this would be a useful feature. Great, more stuff in the BTS that won't be done in years. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |   Acknowledgement sent to Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>.   -t  From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Wichert Akkerman Subject: Bug#77324: Info received (was Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> References: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 77324 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Wichert Akkerman If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 77324@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 77324) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2000 01:02:35 +0000 From wichert@cistron.nl Fri Nov 17 19:02:35 2000 Return-path: Received: from soong.cistron.net (smtp.cistron.nl) [195.64.68.35] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 13wwOo-00026y-00; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:02:35 -0600 Received: from picard.cistron.nl ([195.64.65.20]) by smtp.cistron.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1 (Debian)) id 13wwOn-0004AM-00; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 02:02:33 +0100 Received: (from wichert@localhost) by picard.cistron.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id CAA25623; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 02:02:33 +0100 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 02:02:33 +0100 From: Wichert Akkerman To: Adrian Bunk , 77324@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies Message-ID: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 01:35:53AM +0100 Delivered-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org Previously Adrian Bunk wrote: > After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional > dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a > is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to > implement but I think this would be a useful feature. Great, more stuff in the BTS that won't be done in years. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |   Tags added: wontfix Request was from Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2001 12:14:47 +0000 From wichert@cistron.nl Sat Apr 21 07:14:47 2001 Return-path: Received: from morsig.xs4all.nl (fog.mors.wiggy.net) [213.84.43.14] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14qwHm-0006XO-00; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 07:14:46 -0500 Received: from fog.mors.wiggy.net (IDENT:cs+OQBco9mHdaA1PuaJeAi0HIbv9A9La@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) with ESMTP id f3LBuLfI007749 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:56:21 +0200 Received: (from wichert@localhost) by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) id f3LBuKU7007746 for control@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:56:20 +0200 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:56:20 +0200 From: Wichert Akkerman Message-Id: <200104211156.f3LBuKU7007746@fog.mors.wiggy.net> To: control@bugs.debian.org Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org tag 77324 wontfix   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Dpkg Development <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>, dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#77324; Package dpkg.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgDpkg Development dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies Reply-To: Eduard Bloch , 77324@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Eduard Bloch Original-Sender: Eduard Bloch Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Dpkg Development , dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 11:18:03 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 77324 X-Debian-PR-Package: dpkg X-Debian-PR-Keywords: wontfix Received: via spool by 77324-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B77324.104150591716307 (code B ref 77324); Thu, 02 Jan 2003 11:18:03 GMT Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:11:42 +0100 From: Eduard Bloch To: Wichert Akkerman Cc: Adrian Bunk , 77324@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20030102111142.GA13284@zombie.inka.de> References: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: Eduard Bloch Delivered-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Moin Wichert! Wichert Akkerman schrieb am Saturday, den 18. November 2000: > > After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional > > dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a > > is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to > > implement but I think this would be a useful feature. > > Great, more stuff in the BTS that won't be done in years. Great, now we have a TODO site where you could put this problem on, with a few description about what is needed to do. The feature still does make sense in many cases. Jan 02 02:27:04 re Jan 02 02:27:13 the first step will be to improve UTF-8 support in general. Jan 02 02:27:19 oh, we still need kinda Implizit-Depends: flag for dpkg Jan 02 02:27:20 * aph writing requirements for a job, sooooo boring Jan 02 02:27:28 something you only depend on when another packge exists Jan 02 02:27:28 development versions of gnome-terminal already support it fairly well Jan 02 02:27:42 then the next version is to switch apps to using it as the default. Jan 02 02:27:56 for example, "task-french" package as implizit dependency on kde-i18n-fr Jan 02 02:28:04 no kde, no dependency Jan 02 02:28:09 KDE installed, dependency appears Jan 02 02:28:29 enhances Jan 02 02:28:59 doogie: well, supported by which tools? Jan 02 02:29:02 Zomb: hmmm... kinda like, if pkg X is installed, we also want pkg Y Jan 02 02:29:29 I would call that "conditional depends/recommends/suggests" Jan 02 02:29:30 aph: exactly, something I miss dealing with localisation issues Jan 02 02:29:40 <-- walters has quit ("out") Jan 02 02:29:53 <-- plopix has quit ("leaving") Jan 02 02:29:55 it could probably be done by enhancing the current depends syntax Jan 02 02:30:06 analogous to what they did with the arch-specific depends Jan 02 02:30:10 I don't know why Jan 02 02:30:20 maybe something like Depends: foo & bar Jan 02 02:30:23 logical and Jan 02 02:30:30 hmm, yah Jan 02 02:31:16 kinda; more like, if foo then bar Jan 02 02:32:08 hmmm Jan 02 02:32:22 logical term: (foo & bar) || true Jan 02 02:32:27 foo -> bar Jan 02 02:32:47 or even so Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- "PS: Entgegen einer weitverbreiteten Annahme ist es zB möglich, bug-freie 10.000-Zeilen-Assemblerprogramme zu schreiben, die dann fünfzehn Jahre lang einfach funktionieren." "'Möglich' im Sinne von 'Es ist möglich, 100 m unter 10 Sekunden zu laufen'. In der Praxis verpaßt man die Straßenbahn aber trotzdem." [Anselm Lingnau zu Rainer Weikusat in <387b3a95@nntp.server.uni-frankfurt.de]   Acknowledgement sent to Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Dpkg Development <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>, dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Eduard Bloch Subject: Bug#77324: Info received (was Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030102111142.GA13284@zombie.inka.de> References: <20030102111142.GA13284@zombie.inka.de> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 77324 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Dpkg Development If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 77324@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 77324) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 11:11:57 +0000 From inet@zombie.inka.de Thu Jan 02 05:11:56 2003 Return-path: Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [193.197.184.2] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18U3GU-0004ER-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 05:11:54 -0600 Received: from zombie.inka.de (nobody@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 18U3GT-0005t3-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:11:53 +0100 Received: from inet by zombie.inka.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18U3GI-0003fR-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:11:42 +0100 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:11:42 +0100 From: Eduard Bloch To: Wichert Akkerman Cc: Adrian Bunk , 77324@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies Message-ID: <20030102111142.GA13284@zombie.inka.de> References: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20001118020232.B25288@cistron.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: Eduard Bloch Delivered-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Moin Wichert! Wichert Akkerman schrieb am Saturday, den 18. November 2000: > > After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional > > dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a > > is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to > > implement but I think this would be a useful feature. > > Great, more stuff in the BTS that won't be done in years. Great, now we have a TODO site where you could put this problem on, with a few description about what is needed to do. The feature still does make sense in many cases. Jan 02 02:27:04 re Jan 02 02:27:13 the first step will be to improve UTF-8 support in general. Jan 02 02:27:19 oh, we still need kinda Implizit-Depends: flag for dpkg Jan 02 02:27:20 * aph writing requirements for a job, sooooo boring Jan 02 02:27:28 something you only depend on when another packge exists Jan 02 02:27:28 development versions of gnome-terminal already support it fairly well Jan 02 02:27:42 then the next version is to switch apps to using it as the default. Jan 02 02:27:56 for example, "task-french" package as implizit dependency on kde-i18n-fr Jan 02 02:28:04 no kde, no dependency Jan 02 02:28:09 KDE installed, dependency appears Jan 02 02:28:29 enhances Jan 02 02:28:59 doogie: well, supported by which tools? Jan 02 02:29:02 Zomb: hmmm... kinda like, if pkg X is installed, we also want pkg Y Jan 02 02:29:29 I would call that "conditional depends/recommends/suggests" Jan 02 02:29:30 aph: exactly, something I miss dealing with localisation issues Jan 02 02:29:40 <-- walters has quit ("out") Jan 02 02:29:53 <-- plopix has quit ("leaving") Jan 02 02:29:55 it could probably be done by enhancing the current depends syntax Jan 02 02:30:06 analogous to what they did with the arch-specific depends Jan 02 02:30:10 I don't know why Jan 02 02:30:20 maybe something like Depends: foo & bar Jan 02 02:30:23 logical and Jan 02 02:30:30 hmm, yah Jan 02 02:31:16 kinda; more like, if foo then bar Jan 02 02:32:08 hmmm Jan 02 02:32:22 logical term: (foo & bar) || true Jan 02 02:32:27 foo -> bar Jan 02 02:32:47 or even so Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- "PS: Entgegen einer weitverbreiteten Annahme ist es zB möglich, bug-freie 10.000-Zeilen-Assemblerprogramme zu schreiben, die dann fünfzehn Jahre lang einfach funktionieren." "'Möglich' im Sinne von 'Es ist möglich, 100 m unter 10 Sekunden zu laufen'. In der Praxis verpaßt man die Straßenbahn aber trotzdem." [Anselm Lingnau zu Rainer Weikusat in <387b3a95@nntp.server.uni-frankfurt.de]   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Dpkg Development <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>, dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#77324; Package dpkg.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgDpkg Development dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies Reply-To: Eduard Bloch , 77324@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Eduard Bloch Original-Sender: Eduard Bloch Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Dpkg Development , dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:03:13 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 77324 X-Debian-PR-Package: dpkg X-Debian-PR-Keywords: wontfix Received: via spool by 77324-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B77324.104151251310079 (code B ref 77324); Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:03:13 GMT Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:00:25 +0100 From: Eduard Bloch To: wichert@wiggy.net Cc: Adrian Bunk , 77324@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20030102130025.GB2099@zombie.inka.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: Eduard Bloch Delivered-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Moin Wichert! Wichert Akkerman schrieb am Saturday, den 18. November 2000: > > After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional > > dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a > > is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to > > implement but I think this would be a useful feature. > > Great, more stuff in the BTS that won't be done in years. Great, now we have a TODO site where you could put this problem on, with a few description about what is needed to do. The feature still does make sense in many cases. Jan 02 02:27:04 re Jan 02 02:27:13 the first step will be to improve UTF-8 support in general. Jan 02 02:27:19 oh, we still need kinda Implizit-Depends: flag for dpkg Jan 02 02:27:20 * aph writing requirements for a job, sooooo boring Jan 02 02:27:28 something you only depend on when another packge exists Jan 02 02:27:28 development versions of gnome-terminal already support it fairly well Jan 02 02:27:42 then the next version is to switch apps to using it as the default. Jan 02 02:27:56 for example, "task-french" package as implizit dependency on kde-i18n-fr Jan 02 02:28:04 no kde, no dependency Jan 02 02:28:09 KDE installed, dependency appears Jan 02 02:28:29 enhances Jan 02 02:28:59 doogie: well, supported by which tools? Jan 02 02:29:02 Zomb: hmmm... kinda like, if pkg X is installed, we also want pkg Y Jan 02 02:29:29 I would call that "conditional depends/recommends/suggests" Jan 02 02:29:30 aph: exactly, something I miss dealing with localisation issues Jan 02 02:29:40 <-- walters has quit ("out") Jan 02 02:29:53 <-- plopix has quit ("leaving") Jan 02 02:29:55 it could probably be done by enhancing the current depends syntax Jan 02 02:30:06 analogous to what they did with the arch-specific depends Jan 02 02:30:10 I don't know why Jan 02 02:30:20 maybe something like Depends: foo & bar Jan 02 02:30:23 logical and Jan 02 02:30:30 hmm, yah Jan 02 02:31:16 kinda; more like, if foo then bar Jan 02 02:32:08 hmmm Jan 02 02:32:22 logical term: (foo & bar) || true Jan 02 02:32:27 foo -> bar Jan 02 02:32:47 or even so Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Linux - aus klaren Quellen wird ein starker Strom.   Acknowledgement sent to Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Dpkg Development <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>, dpkg@packages.qa.debian.org.   -t  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Eduard Bloch Subject: Bug#77324: Info received (was Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030102130025.GB2099@zombie.inka.de> References: <20030102130025.GB2099@zombie.inka.de> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 77324 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Dpkg Development If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 77324@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)   Received: (at 77324) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 13:01:53 +0000 From inet@zombie.inka.de Thu Jan 02 07:01:52 2003 Return-path: Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [193.197.184.2] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18U4yt-0002cE-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 07:01:51 -0600 Received: from zombie.inka.de (nobody@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 18U4ys-0001xL-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 14:01:50 +0100 Received: from inet by zombie.inka.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18U4xV-0000l7-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 14:00:25 +0100 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:00:25 +0100 From: Eduard Bloch To: wichert@wiggy.net Cc: Adrian Bunk , 77324@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#77324: dpkg wish: conditional dependencies Message-ID: <20030102130025.GB2099@zombie.inka.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: Eduard Bloch Delivered-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Moin Wichert! Wichert Akkerman schrieb am Saturday, den 18. November 2000: > > After looking at #72264 I think it would be a nice feature to have conditional > > dependencies in dpkg. That means dependencies of the type "if package a > > is installed, you must install package b". I don't know if it is possible to > > implement but I think this would be a useful feature. > > Great, more stuff in the BTS that won't be done in years. Great, now we have a TODO site where you could put this problem on, with a few description about what is needed to do. The feature still does make sense in many cases. Jan 02 02:27:04 re Jan 02 02:27:13 the first step will be to improve UTF-8 support in general. Jan 02 02:27:19 oh, we still need kinda Implizit-Depends: flag for dpkg Jan 02 02:27:20 * aph writing requirements for a job, sooooo boring Jan 02 02:27:28 something you only depend on when another packge exists Jan 02 02:27:28 development versions of gnome-terminal already support it fairly well Jan 02 02:27:42 then the next version is to switch apps to using it as the default. Jan 02 02:27:56 for example, "task-french" package as implizit dependency on kde-i18n-fr Jan 02 02:28:04 no kde, no dependency Jan 02 02:28:09 KDE installed, dependency appears Jan 02 02:28:29 enhances Jan 02 02:28:59 doogie: well, supported by which tools? Jan 02 02:29:02 Zomb: hmmm... kinda like, if pkg X is installed, we also want pkg Y Jan 02 02:29:29 I would call that "conditional depends/recommends/suggests" Jan 02 02:29:30 aph: exactly, something I miss dealing with localisation issues Jan 02 02:29:40 <-- walters has quit ("out") Jan 02 02:29:53 <-- plopix has quit ("leaving") Jan 02 02:29:55 it could probably be done by enhancing the current depends syntax Jan 02 02:30:06 analogous to what they did with the arch-specific depends Jan 02 02:30:10 I don't know why Jan 02 02:30:20 maybe something like Depends: foo & bar Jan 02 02:30:23 logical and Jan 02 02:30:30 hmm, yah Jan 02 02:31:16 kinda; more like, if foo then bar Jan 02 02:32:08 hmmm Jan 02 02:32:22 logical term: (foo & bar) || true Jan 02 02:32:27 foo -> bar Jan 02 02:32:47 or even so Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Linux - aus klaren Quellen wird ein starker Strom.   Tags removed: wontfix Request was from jdthood@yahoo.co.uk (Thomas Hood) to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2004 10:22:43 +0000 From jdthood@yahoo.co.uk Sat Jul 03 03:22:43 2004 Return-path: Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BghfP-0005P7-00; Sat, 03 Jul 2004 03:22:43 -0700 Received: from aglu.demon.nl ([82.161.38.140]:63773 helo=localhost) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BghfO-000ApS-RR for control@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 03 Jul 2004 10:22:42 +0000 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A61D410D6BD; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:21:58 +0200 (CEST) To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: tagging 77324 Message-Id: <20040703102158.A61D410D6BD@localhost> Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 12:21:58 +0200 (CEST) From: jdthood@yahoo.co.uk (Thomas Hood) Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: tags 77324 - wontfix   Changed Bug submitter from Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> to Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>. Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org.   Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2004 23:30:35 +0000 From bunk@stusta.de Mon Oct 18 16:30:35 2004 Return-path: Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CJgxW-0005vo-00; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:30:34 -0700 Received: (qmail 5439 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 23:30:33 -0000 Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 23:30:33 -0000 Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AB71CAFB8B; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:30:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:30:01 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: control@bugs.debian.org Subject: change my email address Message-ID: <20041018233001.GY2466@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: submitter 173779 ! submitter 240562 ! submitter 250106 ! submitter 254785 ! submitter 268199 ! submitter 268320 ! submitter 274300 ! submitter 210306 ! submitter 215709 ! submitter 259461 ! submitter 264276 ! submitter 272853 ! submitter 272860 ! submitter 274306 ! submitter 55364 ! submitter 152152 ! submitter 195430 ! submitter 214732 ! submitter 216578 ! submitter 246983 ! submitter 260556 ! submitter 266154 ! submitter 266449 ! submitter 273356 ! submitter 273581 ! submitter 65797 ! submitter 121262 ! submitter 144876 ! submitter 152206 ! submitter 193989 ! submitter 195956 ! submitter 203981 ! submitter 215927 ! submitter 215928 ! submitter 216533 ! submitter 223904 ! submitter 223915 ! submitter 223918 ! submitter 229711 ! submitter 230993 ! submitter 231820 ! submitter 239953 ! submitter 254469 ! submitter 255145 ! submitter 260021 ! submitter 260444 ! submitter 261271 ! submitter 262423 ! submitter 262429 ! submitter 262432 ! submitter 262652 ! submitter 262721 ! submitter 262730 ! submitter 263345 ! submitter 263353 ! submitter 264109 ! submitter 264221 ! submitter 264227 ! submitter 264230 ! submitter 264232 ! submitter 264271 ! submitter 265775 ! submitter 265776 ! submitter 269477 ! submitter 269479 ! submitter 90817 ! submitter 128653 ! submitter 130855 ! submitter 195542 ! submitter 223623 ! submitter 223863 ! submitter 226641 ! submitter 249204 ! submitter 260005 ! submitter 260020 ! submitter 262420 ! submitter 263781 ! submitter 264690 ! submitter 266155 ! submitter 266157 ! submitter 267856 ! submitter 273315 ! submitter 273847 ! submitter 62759 ! submitter 69143 ! submitter 71352 ! submitter 71789 ! submitter 77324 ! submitter 77325 ! submitter 79428 ! submitter 92569 ! submitter 100186 ! submitter 105337 ! submitter 128652 ! submitter 128997 ! submitter 130856 ! submitter 132952 ! submitter 140847 ! submitter 143889 ! submitter 145257 ! submitter 159092 ! submitter 159847 ! submitter 165921 ! submitter 181335 ! submitter 184979 ! submitter 191925 ! submitter 193228 ! submitter 196597 ! submitter 196883 ! submitter 198694 ! submitter 201157 ! submitter 216104 ! submitter 223675 ! submitter 224618 ! submitter 230178 ! submitter 236232 ! submitter 239585 ! submitter 241059 ! submitter 243735 ! submitter 243744 ! submitter 249196 ! submitter 255345 ! submitter 255349 ! submitter 255351 ! submitter 255355 ! submitter 255358 ! submitter 255364 ! submitter 255365 ! submitter 260510 ! submitter 262729 ! submitter 262776 ! submitter 262777 ! submitter 262780 ! submitter 263773 ! submitter 266212 ! submitter 266402 ! submitter 267507 ! submitter 270061 ! submitter 270062 ! submitter 270063 ! submitter 271581 ! submitter 274694 ! submitter 274747 ! submitter 202797 ! submitter 276749 ! submitter 266161 ! submitter 273040 ! submitter 244759 ! submitter 255354 ! submitter 255362 ! submitter 266335 ! submitter 92977 ! submitter 215909 ! submitter 240549 ! submitter 240551 ! submitter 240561 ! submitter 240566 ! submitter 240572 ! submitter 259280 ! submitter 260024 ! submitter 263770 ! submitter 264053 ! submitter 265494 ! submitter 199728 ! submitter 209338 ! submitter 215637 ! submitter 215638 ! submitter 215664 ! submitter 216131 ! submitter 216142 ! submitter 221159 ! submitter 221377 ! submitter 227256 ! submitter 237421 ! submitter 239711 ! submitter 240546 ! submitter 251635 ! submitter 269330 ! submitter 273043 ! submitter 273357 ! submitter 199557 ! submitter 199435 ! submitter 241290 ! submitter 136944 ! submitter 183117 ! submitter 198347 ! submitter 199293 ! submitter 240616 ! submitter 273038 ! submitter 274444 ! submitter 274445 ! submitter 274915 ! submitter 274916 ! submitter 274917 ! submitter 271703 ! submitter 272317 ! submitter 272318 ! submitter 272745 ! submitter 272747 ! submitter 272852 ! submitter 272854 ! submitter 272855 ! submitter 272856 ! submitter 272857 ! submitter 272858 ! submitter 273039 ! submitter 273042 ! submitter 273048 ! submitter 273734 ! submitter 273735 ! submitter 273737 ! submitter 252928 ! submitter 262720 ! submitter 262427 ! submitter 264218 ! submitter 266208 ! submitter 273751 ! submitter 255366 ! thanks   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Dpkg Developers <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#77324; Package dpkg.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgDpkg Developers  X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#77324: Working part time Reply-To: "giacobo gus" , 77324@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: "giacobo gus" Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Dpkg Developers Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:48:38 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 77324 X-Debian-PR-Package: dpkg X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: dpkg Received: via spool by 77324-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B77324.12207727983288 (code B ref 77324); Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:48:38 +0000 Received: (at 77324) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2008 07:33:18 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.0 tests=FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,MONEY,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ppp85-140-161-164.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([85.140.161.164]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KcElp-0000bH-3o for 77324@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:33:17 +0000 Message-ID: <000801c910bb$07bbfe4c$ae2a5f85@lqfuivv> From: "giacobo gus" To: <77324@bugs.debian.org> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:45:53 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 We have reviewed your resume and would like to introduce you to our current vacancy. Luksus, with headquarters in Helsinki, Finland, serves the luxury lifestyle and offers unparalleled access to the finest luxury goods. We offer a unique mix of brands, partnerships, and product expertise. We are currently hiring, work at home positions, to provide administrative assistance with sales in North America. Candidates for the job should possess excellent organizational skills as well as the ability to efficiently multi-task. Ideal candidates have a strong focus on day-to-day operational excellence. The candidate should be motivated, proactive, be able to learn and adapt quickly. Other duties include, but are not limited to: * Incorporating effective priorities for the virtual office function * Administer day-to-day financial responsibilities for clients * Reporting online daily * Preparing brief summary reports, and weekly financial reports Salary part-time (3 hours per day, Monday-Friday): $1,200/month, plus commission. If you are interested in this position please send us an email to Sandra.Collins@luksus-jobs.org expressing your interest and we will forward you the detailed job description and the working agreement. Thank You, Luksus Team   Acknowledgement sent to "giacobo gus" <ventas@cowparade.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Dpkg Developers <debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org>.   -t  Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: "giacobo gus" Subject: Bug#77324: Info received (Working part time) Message-ID: References: <000801c910bb$07bbfe4c$ae2a5f85@lqfuivv> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 77324 X-Debian-PR-Package: dpkg X-Debian-PR-Source: dpkg Reply-To: 77324@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Dpkg Developers If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 77324@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not send mail to owner@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 77324: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D77324 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems   Received: (at 77324) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2008 07:33:18 +0000 From ventas@cowparade.com Sun Sep 07 07:33:18 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.0 tests=FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,MONEY,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from ppp85-140-161-164.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([85.140.161.164]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KcElp-0000bH-3o for 77324@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:33:17 +0000 Message-ID: <000801c910bb$07bbfe4c$ae2a5f85@lqfuivv> From: "giacobo gus" To: <77324@bugs.debian.org> Subject: Working part time Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:45:53 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 We have reviewed your resume and would like to introduce you to our current vacancy. Luksus, with headquarters in Helsinki, Finland, serves the luxury lifestyle and offers unparalleled access to the finest luxury goods. We offer a unique mix of brands, partnerships, and product expertise. We are currently hiring, work at home positions, to provide administrative assistance with sales in North America. Candidates for the job should possess excellent organizational skills as well as the ability to efficiently multi-task. Ideal candidates have a strong focus on day-to-day operational excellence. The candidate should be motivated, proactive, be able to learn and adapt quickly. Other duties include, but are not limited to: * Incorporating effective priorities for the virtual office function * Administer day-to-day financial responsibilities for clients * Reporting online daily * Preparing brief summary reports, and weekly financial reports Salary part-time (3 hours per day, Monday-Friday): $1,200/month, plus commission. If you are interested in this position please send us an email to Sandra.Collins@luksus-jobs.org expressing your interest and we will forward you the detailed job description and the working agreement. Thank You, Luksus Team