Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2000 17:15:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 17237 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2000 17:15:15 -0000 Received: from mixing.qc.dfo-mpo.gc.ca (HELO mixing.qc.dfo.ca) (207.216.183.21) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2000 17:15:15 -0000 Received: from mixing.qc.dfo.ca (rhogee@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mixing.qc.dfo.ca (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA12742; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:14:47 -0500 Message-Id: <200001141714.MAA12742@mixing.qc.dfo.ca> To: Mitch Blevins , Brian White , submit@bugs.debian.org cc: Peter S Galbraith Subject: I think /etc/init.d/powerfail shouldn't be a conffile Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:14:47 -0500 From: Peter S Galbraith Package: powstatd Version: 1.4.1-3 Hello Mitch and Brian, I maintain the ups-monitor powstatd and something occurred to me about /etc/init.d/powerfail. The bpowerd, genpower and powstatd all have /etc/init.d/powerfail as a conffile. When a user tries installing these packages to see which is best for his UPS, he might inadvertently use the powerfail script from another package. For example: - I install powstatd. - I remove (but not purge powstatd). - I install genpower. - if I don't install the package's /etc/init.d/powerfail, I use the one from powstatd - Suppose I select to keep the package's /etc/init.d/powerfail - Then I remove genpower and re-install powstatd - if I don't install the package's /etc/init.d/powerfail, I use the one from genpower This is untested, but the fact that we all use the same filename (no choice about this) implies to me that it should not stick around after remove (and not purging) the package. Thoughts? I'm submitting this as a bug against my own package as a log of the discussion, if any. I'm probably going to remove /etc/init.d/powerfail as a conffile and put whatever configuration it can have in another conffile, like /etc/init.d/powstatd. I'll email you both the bug number as soon as I get it, should you want your comments logged there too. Peter