Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgBen Collins Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Mark Brown Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Ben Collins Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:22:01 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.98555161023934 (code B ref -1); Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:22:01 GMT From: Mark Brown To: Debian Bug Tracking System X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:16:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20010325201638.206DDE7D2@cassiel.sirena.org.uk> Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: normal According to SUSv2: | The structure semid_ds contains the following members: | | struct ipc_perm sem_perm operation permission structure | unsigned short int sem_nsems number of semaphores in set | time_t sem_otime last semop^) time | time_t sem_ctime last time changed by semctl() but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog included in the package. This does not appear to have changed in the current Austin Group draft. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cassiel 2.4.2 #31 Mon Feb 26 23:18:39 GMT 2001 i586 Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.2.2-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an Acknowledgement sent to Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>. -t From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Mark Brown Subject: Bug#91311: Acknowledgement (semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20010325201638.206DDE7D2@cassiel.sirena.org.uk> References: <20010325201638.206DDE7D2@cassiel.sirena.org.uk> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 91311 Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has been received. It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Ben Collins If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to bugs@bugs.debian.org). Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2001 20:20:10 +0000 From broonie@sirena.org.uk Sun Mar 25 14:20:09 2001 Return-path: Received: from cephyr.cid.net (mail.cid.net) [212.172.21.2] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14hGzh-0006Dz-00; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 14:20:09 -0600 Received: from uucp by mail.cid.net (Exim 3.22) with local-rmail id 14hGzf-0006oj-00; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:20:08 +0200 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk (cassiel.localdomain [192.168.56.2]) by zebulon.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7576018005; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:16:40 +0100 (BST) Received: by cassiel.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 206DDE7D2; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:16:38 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Brown To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:16:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20010325201638.206DDE7D2@cassiel.sirena.org.uk> Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.2.2-3 Severity: normal According to SUSv2: | The structure semid_ds contains the following members: | | struct ipc_perm sem_perm operation permission structure | unsigned short int sem_nsems number of semaphores in set | time_t sem_otime last semop^) time | time_t sem_ctime last time changed by semctl() but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog included in the package. This does not appear to have changed in the current Austin Group draft. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cassiel 2.4.2 #31 Mon Feb 26 23:18:39 GMT 2001 i586 Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.2.2-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: GOTO Masanori , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: GOTO Masanori Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:18:02 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.104744245613202 (code B ref 91311); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 04:18:02 GMT Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:14:14 +0900 Message-ID: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: > Package: libc6-dev > Version: 2.2.2-3 > Severity: normal > > According to SUSv2: > > | The structure semid_ds contains the following members: > | > | struct ipc_perm sem_perm operation permission structure > | unsigned short int sem_nsems number of semaphores in set > | time_t sem_otime last semop^) time > | time_t sem_ctime last time changed by semctl() > > but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an > unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog > included in the package. This does not appear to have changed in the > current Austin Group draft. Does this bug cause some problems? Some architecture on linux defines sem_nsems as unsigned long int. Regards, -- gotom Acknowledgement sent to GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: GOTO Masanori Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 04:14:16 +0000 From gotom@debian.or.jp Tue Mar 11 22:14:16 2003 Return-path: Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18sxdA-0003Qi-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:14:16 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90D8C33C6; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:14:14 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:14:14 +0900 Message-ID: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: > Package: libc6-dev > Version: 2.2.2-3 > Severity: normal > > According to SUSv2: > > | The structure semid_ds contains the following members: > | > | struct ipc_perm sem_perm operation permission structure > | unsigned short int sem_nsems number of semaphores in set > | time_t sem_otime last semop^) time > | time_t sem_ctime last time changed by semctl() > > but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an > unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog > included in the package. This does not appear to have changed in the > current Austin Group draft. Does this bug cause some problems? Some architecture on linux defines sem_nsems as unsigned long int. Regards, -- gotom Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Mark Brown Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:18:21 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.10474570012621 (code B ref 91311); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:18:21 GMT Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:16:37 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: Dime is money. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:14:14PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an > > unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog > Does this bug cause some problems? Some architecture on linux defines > sem_nsems as unsigned long int. It causes problems for things like TenDRA that try to use standards pedantry to their own ends - I've got a workaround in the TenDRA package because of this. --=20 "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+buzjJ2Vo11xhU60RAobNAKD6y2j/Mcn8xgq/Leg/U+x66K6CNACgsPzk 7rYmUNVVxn45+st+8EMfe+0= =NlIs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- Acknowledgement sent to Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Mark Brown Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> References: <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 08:16:41 +0000 From broonie@sirena.org.uk Wed Mar 12 02:16:40 2003 Return-path: Received: from pc-62-31-68-51-ed.blueyonder.co.uk (shenandoah.sirena.org.uk) [62.31.68.51] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18t1Pk-0000fu-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 02:16:40 -0600 Received: by shenandoah.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92BE93B112; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:16:37 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:16:37 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Message-ID: <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: Dime is money. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:14:14PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an > > unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog > Does this bug cause some problems? Some architecture on linux defines > sem_nsems as unsigned long int. It causes problems for things like TenDRA that try to use standards pedantry to their own ends - I've got a workaround in the TenDRA package because of this. --=20 "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+buzjJ2Vo11xhU60RAobNAKD6y2j/Mcn8xgq/Leg/U+x66K6CNACgsPzk 7rYmUNVVxn45+st+8EMfe+0= =NlIs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: GOTO Masanori , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: GOTO Masanori Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:18:06 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.104747455122572 (code B ref 91311); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:18:06 GMT Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:09:08 +0900 Message-ID: <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Cc: GOTO Masanori In-Reply-To: <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:16:37 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an > > > unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog > > > Does this bug cause some problems? Some architecture on linux defines > > sem_nsems as unsigned long int. > > It causes problems for things like TenDRA that try to use standards > pedantry to their own ends - I've got a workaround in the TenDRA package > because of this. So, what is the problem? TenDRA warns something? I rebuild TenDRA without any your debian patches, but the result of my build is not related any semid_ds issue. Repeatedly, some architecture defined it as unsigned long. sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(unsigned short). If we change it to unsigned short, then the data may be lost. Regards, -- gotom Acknowledgement sent to GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: GOTO Masanori Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> References: <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 13:09:11 +0000 From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Mar 12 07:09:10 2003 Return-path: Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18t5yo-0005rk-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:09:10 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA984C33C8; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:09:08 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:09:08 +0900 Message-ID: <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Cc: GOTO Masanori Subject: Re: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 In-Reply-To: <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:16:37 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > but bits/sem.h defines struct semid_ds such that sem_nsems is an > > > unsigned long. I can't see any reference to this in the changelog > > > Does this bug cause some problems? Some architecture on linux defines > > sem_nsems as unsigned long int. > > It causes problems for things like TenDRA that try to use standards > pedantry to their own ends - I've got a workaround in the TenDRA package > because of this. So, what is the problem? TenDRA warns something? I rebuild TenDRA without any your debian patches, but the result of my build is not related any semid_ds issue. Repeatedly, some architecture defined it as unsigned long. sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(unsigned short). If we change it to unsigned short, then the data may be lost. Regards, -- gotom Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Mark Brown Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:03:05 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.104747720510112 (code B ref 91311); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:03:05 GMT Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:53:23 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: You will contract a rare disease. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:09:08PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > So, what is the problem? TenDRA warns something? I rebuild TenDRA > without any your debian patches, but the result of my build is not > related any semid_ds issue. TenDRA fails to compile when one of the patches is removed since it checks the exact type while building its APIs. IIRC it's one of the bits in this hunk but I can't remember which: --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 -#define __semun_defined 1 #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you want. > Repeatedly, some architecture defined it as unsigned long. > sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(unsigned short). > If we change it to unsigned short, then the data may be lost. Sorry, I don't know the best way to fix this in a glibc-style fashion. It's a rather pedantic bug at the best of times so making a fix only come into play when people particularly ask for standards conformance might be an option. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." Acknowledgement sent to Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Mark Brown Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> References: <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 13:53:25 +0000 From broonie@sirena.org.uk Wed Mar 12 07:53:25 2003 Return-path: Received: from pc-62-31-68-51-ed.blueyonder.co.uk (shenandoah.sirena.org.uk) [62.31.68.51] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18t6fc-0002cs-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:53:24 -0600 Received: by shenandoah.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B1083B13D; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:53:23 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:53:23 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Message-ID: <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: You will contract a rare disease. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:09:08PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > So, what is the problem? TenDRA warns something? I rebuild TenDRA > without any your debian patches, but the result of my build is not > related any semid_ds issue. TenDRA fails to compile when one of the patches is removed since it checks the exact type while building its APIs. IIRC it's one of the bits in this hunk but I can't remember which: --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 -#define __semun_defined 1 #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you want. > Repeatedly, some architecture defined it as unsigned long. > sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(unsigned short). > If we change it to unsigned short, then the data may be lost. Sorry, I don't know the best way to fix this in a glibc-style fashion. It's a rather pedantic bug at the best of times so making a fix only come into play when people particularly ask for standards conformance might be an option. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: GOTO Masanori , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: GOTO Masanori Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:33:03 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.10474831512934 (code B ref 91311); Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:33:03 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:32:29 +0900 Message-ID: <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown Cc: GOTO Masanori , 91311@bugs.debian.org In-Reply-To: <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:53:23 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:09:08PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > So, what is the problem? TenDRA warns something? I rebuild TenDRA > > without any your debian patches, but the result of my build is not > > related any semid_ds issue. > > TenDRA fails to compile when one of the patches is removed since it > checks the exact type while building its APIs. IIRC it's one of the > bits in this hunk but I can't remember which: > > --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ > #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 > #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 > #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 > -#define __semun_defined 1 > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO > > One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you > want. Yes, please check. My build does not barf the error in sem.[ch] and sem_prot.[ch]. > > Repeatedly, some architecture defined it as unsigned long. > > sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(unsigned short). > > If we change it to unsigned short, then the data may be lost. > > Sorry, I don't know the best way to fix this in a glibc-style fashion. > It's a rather pedantic bug at the best of times so making a fix only > come into play when people particularly ask for standards conformance > might be an option. OK, I see the point is "pedantic" conformance analysis of glibc definition, not standard conformance. Regards, -- gotom Acknowledgement sent to GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: GOTO Masanori Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> References: <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 15:32:31 +0000 From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Mar 12 09:32:31 2003 Return-path: Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18t8DW-0000l6-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:32:31 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB25AC33C6; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:32:29 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:32:29 +0900 Message-ID: <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown Cc: GOTO Masanori , 91311@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 In-Reply-To: <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:53:23 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:09:08PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > So, what is the problem? TenDRA warns something? I rebuild TenDRA > > without any your debian patches, but the result of my build is not > > related any semid_ds issue. > > TenDRA fails to compile when one of the patches is removed since it > checks the exact type while building its APIs. IIRC it's one of the > bits in this hunk but I can't remember which: > > --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ > #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 > #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 > #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 > -#define __semun_defined 1 > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO > > One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you > want. Yes, please check. My build does not barf the error in sem.[ch] and sem_prot.[ch]. > > Repeatedly, some architecture defined it as unsigned long. > > sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(unsigned short). > > If we change it to unsigned short, then the data may be lost. > > Sorry, I don't know the best way to fix this in a glibc-style fashion. > It's a rather pedantic bug at the best of times so making a fix only > come into play when people particularly ask for standards conformance > might be an option. OK, I see the point is "pedantic" conformance analysis of glibc definition, not standard conformance. Regards, -- gotom Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Mark Brown Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:33:09 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.10475616661238 (code B ref 91311); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:33:09 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:21:04 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:32:29AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ > > #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 > > #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 > > #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 > > -#define __semun_defined 1 > > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO > > One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you > > want. > Yes, please check. My build does not barf the error in sem.[ch] and > sem_prot.[ch]. It's __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO that's working around the problem. > OK, I see the point is "pedantic" conformance analysis of glibc > definition, not standard conformance. Well, it's both really. The standard says X and glibc does Y so clearly there's a standards conformance thing here. It's just that it's only a pretty unusual application that's going to notice this particular thing. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." Acknowledgement sent to Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Mark Brown Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> References: <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 13:21:06 +0000 From broonie@sirena.org.uk Thu Mar 13 07:21:06 2003 Return-path: Received: from pc-62-31-68-51-ed.blueyonder.co.uk (shenandoah.sirena.org.uk) [62.31.68.51] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18tSdu-0000Jl-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:21:06 -0600 Received: by shenandoah.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9DD8E3B13D; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:21:04 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:21:04 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Message-ID: <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:32:29AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ > > #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 > > #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 > > #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 > > -#define __semun_defined 1 > > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO > > One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you > > want. > Yes, please check. My build does not barf the error in sem.[ch] and > sem_prot.[ch]. It's __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO that's working around the problem. > OK, I see the point is "pedantic" conformance analysis of glibc > definition, not standard conformance. Well, it's both really. The standard says X and glibc does Y so clearly there's a standards conformance thing here. It's just that it's only a pretty unusual application that's going to notice this particular thing. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: GOTO Masanori , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: GOTO Masanori Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 01:03:03 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.104760360428546 (code B ref 91311); Fri, 14 Mar 2003 01:03:03 GMT Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:00:02 +0900 Message-ID: <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Cc: GOTO Masanori In-Reply-To: <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:21:04 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:32:29AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > > +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > > @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ > > > #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 > > > #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 > > > #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 > > > -#define __semun_defined 1 > > > > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO > > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H > > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO > > > > One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you > > > want. > > > Yes, please check. My build does not barf the error in sem.[ch] and > > sem_prot.[ch]. > > It's __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO that's working around the problem. So did the prior error occur from this issue? Or I guess it's something other things which is already fixed in these days... TenDRA things are still "workaround" state, but at least I think glibc definition satisfies your requirement, linux definition and the standards (not strictly, but some degree). Could I close this bug? Regards, -- gotom Acknowledgement sent to GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: GOTO Masanori Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> References: <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2003 01:00:04 +0000 From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Mar 13 19:00:04 2003 Return-path: Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18tdYJ-0007QD-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:00:04 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C582C33C9; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:00:02 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:00:02 +0900 Message-ID: <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Cc: GOTO Masanori Subject: Re: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 In-Reply-To: <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:21:04 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:32:29AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > --- tendra-4.1.2.orig/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > > +++ tendra-4.1.2/src/lib/machines/linux/80x86/startup/xpg3.h > > > @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ > > > #define _SVID_SOURCE 1 > > > #define _BSD_SOURCE 1 > > > #define __SVR4_I386_ABI_L1__ 1 > > > -#define __semun_defined 1 > > > > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_OLD > > > #define __WRONG_XPG3_SEARCH_H_SRCH_PROTO > > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H > > > +#define __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO > > > > One of the last two defines there. I can check further tonight if you > > > want. > > > Yes, please check. My build does not barf the error in sem.[ch] and > > sem_prot.[ch]. > > It's __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO that's working around the problem. So did the prior error occur from this issue? Or I guess it's something other things which is already fixed in these days... TenDRA things are still "workaround" state, but at least I think glibc definition satisfies your requirement, linux definition and the standards (not strictly, but some degree). Could I close this bug? Regards, -- gotom Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Mark Brown Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:18:05 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.104763284727849 (code B ref 91311); Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:18:05 GMT Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:07:24 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Message-ID: <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: Stamp out philately. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:00:02AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > So did the prior error occur from this issue? Or I guess it's > something other things which is already fixed in these days... What prior error? If you mean the build failures due to this then they were introduced with glibc 2.1 or 2.2 and are still present in glibc 2.3. > TenDRA things are still "workaround" state, but at least I think glibc > definition satisfies your requirement, linux definition and the > standards (not strictly, but some degree). Could I close this bug? Nothing has changed since the bug was reported - I'd say leave it open. It's always possible someone will come along and implement a standard conforming wrapper. --=20 "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+cZvIJ2Vo11xhU60RAqMlAKCeRJwrJN7gboiQFYAMYVfF5YaIVQCguPe5 EEfLldzz32OB7Lr/b9+kA7c= =V98G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz-- Acknowledgement sent to Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: Mark Brown Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> References: <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2003 09:07:27 +0000 From broonie@sirena.org.uk Fri Mar 14 03:07:27 2003 Return-path: Received: from pc-62-31-68-51-ed.blueyonder.co.uk (shenandoah.sirena.org.uk) [62.31.68.51] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18tl9y-0007Es-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 03:07:26 -0600 Received: by shenandoah.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 473243B13D; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:07:24 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:07:24 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: GOTO Masanori Cc: 91311@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Message-ID: <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Cookie: Stamp out philately. X-WWW-Homepage: http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:00:02AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > So did the prior error occur from this issue? Or I guess it's > something other things which is already fixed in these days... What prior error? If you mean the build failures due to this then they were introduced with glibc 2.1 or 2.2 and are still present in glibc 2.3. > TenDRA things are still "workaround" state, but at least I think glibc > definition satisfies your requirement, linux definition and the > standards (not strictly, but some degree). Could I close this bug? Nothing has changed since the bug was reported - I'd say leave it open. It's always possible someone will come along and implement a standard conforming wrapper. --=20 "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+cZvIJ2Vo11xhU60RAqMlAKCeRJwrJN7gboiQFYAMYVfF5YaIVQCguPe5 EEfLldzz32OB7Lr/b9+kA7c= =V98G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz-- Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers glibc@packages.qa.debian.org X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 Reply-To: GOTO Masanori , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: GOTO Masanori Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers , glibc@packages.qa.debian.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:33:03 GMT Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: report 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.10477453317158 (code B ref 91311); Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:33:03 GMT Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:22:09 +0900 Message-ID: <80bs0cob0u.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Cc: GOTO Masanori In-Reply-To: <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:07:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:00:02AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > So did the prior error occur from this issue? Or I guess it's > > something other things which is already fixed in these days... > > What prior error? If you mean the build failures due to this then they > were introduced with glibc 2.1 or 2.2 and are still present in glibc > 2.3. You said "It's __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO that's working around the problem". At least I think your problem is already fixed. You have not described the real error. Who have trouble? Provide me the _real example_, or your _build message_. > > TenDRA things are still "workaround" state, but at least I think glibc > > definition satisfies your requirement, linux definition and the > > standards (not strictly, but some degree). Could I close this bug? > > Nothing has changed since the bug was reported - I'd say leave it open. > It's always possible someone will come along and implement a standard > conforming wrapper. So you contact to the upstream yourself. I don't think "we have to conform to the (sometimes old) standard everytime". Why do you want to conform the standard? -- gotom Acknowledgement sent to GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>, glibc@packages.qa.debian.org. -t X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: GOTO Masanori Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (was Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <80bs0cob0u.wl@oris.opensource.jp> References: <80bs0cob0u.wl@oris.opensource.jp> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message, unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2003 16:22:11 +0000 From gotom@debian.or.jp Sat Mar 15 10:22:11 2003 Return-path: Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18uEQE-0001rC-00; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:22:10 -0600 Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73]) by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6C0C33C6; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:22:09 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:22:09 +0900 Message-ID: <80bs0cob0u.wl@oris.opensource.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: Mark Brown , 91311@bugs.debian.org Cc: GOTO Masanori Subject: Re: Bug#91311: semid_ds conflicts with SUSv2 In-Reply-To: <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> References: <80of4h5ii1.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312081635.GA12123@sirena.org.uk> <80llzk68az.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030312135323.GB20673@sirena.org.uk> <80isuo61o2.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030313132104.GA5573@sirena.org.uk> <80llzioj8t.wl@oris.opensource.jp> <20030314090720.GA26358@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: At Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:07:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:00:02AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > So did the prior error occur from this issue? Or I guess it's > > something other things which is already fixed in these days... > > What prior error? If you mean the build failures due to this then they > were introduced with glibc 2.1 or 2.2 and are still present in glibc > 2.3. You said "It's __WRONG_XPG3_SYS_SEM_H_SEM_PROTO that's working around the problem". At least I think your problem is already fixed. You have not described the real error. Who have trouble? Provide me the _real example_, or your _build message_. > > TenDRA things are still "workaround" state, but at least I think glibc > > definition satisfies your requirement, linux definition and the > > standards (not strictly, but some degree). Could I close this bug? > > Nothing has changed since the bug was reported - I'd say leave it open. > It's always possible someone will come along and implement a standard > conforming wrapper. So you contact to the upstream yourself. I don't think "we have to conform to the (sometimes old) standard everytime". Why do you want to conform the standard? -- gotom Tags added: wontfix Request was from GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp> to control@bugs.debian.org. Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 12:02:08 +0000 From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Jul 28 05:02:08 2004 Return-path: Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bpn8K-0007I4-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:02:08 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965A7DEB80 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:02:07 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:02:07 +0900 Message-ID: <81oem08hmo.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: control@bugs.debian.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: tags 91311 wontfix severity 91311 minor severity 227386 minor thanks Severity set to `minor'. Request was from GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp> to control@bugs.debian.org. Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 12:02:08 +0000 From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Jul 28 05:02:08 2004 Return-path: Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bpn8K-0007I4-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 05:02:08 -0700 Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965A7DEB80 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:02:07 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:02:07 +0900 Message-ID: <81oem08hmo.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> From: GOTO Masanori To: control@bugs.debian.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: tags 91311 wontfix severity 91311 minor severity 227386 minor thanks Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#91311; Package libc6-dev. debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgGNU Libc Maintainers X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#91311: 1// =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A0=D0=B5=D0=B0=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=8F!_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=89=D1=8C!//iii?= Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94._?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A3=D1=81=D0=BF=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9?= , 91311@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94._?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A3=D1=81=D0=BF=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9?= Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: GNU Libc Maintainers Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:27:18 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: wontfix X-Debian-PR-Source: glibc Received: via spool by 91311-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B91311.122081549317612 (code B ref 91311); Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:27:18 +0000 Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2008 19:24:53 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=4.0 tests=MULTALT,NEXTPART autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from [85.110.143.165] by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPlM-0001nK-Fg for 91311@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:17:39 +0000 Message-ID: <000501c9111e$06c4859a$ac7f3088@njjpxkw> From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94._?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A3=D1=81=D0=BF=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9?= To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=93=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=B4=D0=B8=D0=B9?= <91311@bugs.debian.org> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:30:06 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0002_01C9111E.06BF7D73" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C9111E.06BF7D73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =F0=CF=CC=D5=DE=C9=D4=C5 =CD=C7=CE=CF=D7=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =D2=C5=DA=D5=CC=D8=D4=C1=D4! =F2=C1=D3=D3=D9=CC=CB=C9!!! =EE=C1=DB=C1 =CB=CF=CD=C1=CE=C4=C1 – = =CD=CF=DD=CE=D9=CA =C7=C5=CE=C5=D2=C1=D4=CF=D2 = =CB=D2=C5=C1=D4=C9=D7=CE=D9=C8 =C9=C4=C5=CA =C9 = =D2=C1=C3=C9=CF=CE=C1=CC=D8=CE=D9=C8 =D2=C5=DB=C5=CE=C9=CA, = =D0=CF=DC=D4=CF=CD=D5 =D3 =CE=C1=CD=C9 =D7=D9=C7=CF=C4=CE=CF =C9 = =D5=C4=CF=C2=CE=CF =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C1=D4=D8! =F7=F9 =EB=E1=EB =F5=F3=F0=E5=FB=EE=F9=E5 =EC=E0=E4=E9 = =CF=C2=D1=DA=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8=CE=CF =C4=CF=CC=D6=CE=D9 = =D7=CF=D3=D0=CF=CC=D8=DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=D8=D3=D1 e-mail = =D2.=C1.=D3.=D3.=D9.=CC.=CB.=CF.=CA =20 =D0=CF=D4=CF=CD=D5 =DE=D4=CF =DC=D4=CF = =F7=F9=F3=EF=EB=EF=FC=E6=E6=E5=EB=F4=E9=F7=EE=F9=EA =D3=D0=CF=D3=CF=C2 = =C4=CF=CE=C5=D3=C5=CE=C9=D1 =C9=CE=C6=CF=D2=CD=C1=C3=C9=C9 =CF = =F7=C1=DB=C9=C8 =D5=D3=CC=D5=C7=C1=C8! =ED=D9 =D0=CF=CD=CF=C7=C1=C5=CD =CE=C1=DB=C9=CD = =CB=CC=C9=C5=CE=D4=C1=CD =C4=CF=C2=C9=D4=D8=D3=D1 =CE=CF=D7=D9=C8 = =CB=CF=CE=CB=D5=D2=C5=CE=D4=CE=D9=C8 =D0=D2=C5=C9=CD=D5=DD=C5=D3=D4=D7, = =D3=CC=C5=C4=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8=CE=CF, = =CF=C2=D2=C1=D4=C9=D7=DB=C9=D3=D8 =CB =CE=C1=CD =F7=D9 = =D3=C4=C5=CC=C1=CC=C9 =D0=D2=C1=D7=C9=CC=D8=CE=D9=CA =D7=D9=C2=CF=D2!! =F0=D2=CF=D3=D4=CF =C4=CF=C2=C1=D7=D8=D4=C5 =CB =F7=C1=DB=C9=CD = =D0=CF=D3=D4=CF=D1=CE=CE=D9=CD =D2=C5=CB=CC=C1=CD=CE=D9=CD = =D0=D2=CF=C5=CB=D4=C1=CD e-mail =D2=C1=D3=D3=D9=CC=CB=D5 – = =DC=D4=CF =CE=C1=C9=C2=CF=CC=C5=C5 =D0=D2=C1=D7=C9=CC=D8=CE=D9=CA = =C8=CF=C4, =D4=C1=CB =CB=C1=CB =DA=C1=D4=D2=C1=D4=D9 =CE=C1 = =DC=D4=CF=D4 =D7=C9=C4 =D2=C5=CB=CC=C1=CD=D9 = =CE=C5=D3=D2=C1=D7=CE=C9=CD=CF =CD=C1=CC=D9!

=F5=D3=CB=CF=D2=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =C4=CF=CB=D5=CD=C5=CE=D4=CF=CF=C2=CF=D2=CF=D4

=E2=D9=D3=D4=D2=C1=D1 = =CF=C2=D2=C1=C2=CF=D4=CB=C1 =C9=CE=C6=CF=D2=CD=C1=C3=C9=C9 =

=F0=D2=C5=C4=CF=D3=D4=C1=D7=CC=C5=CE=C9=C5 = =D0=C5=D2=D3=CF=CE=C1=CC=D8=CE=CF=C7=CF =CD=C5=CE=C5=C4=D6=C5=D2=C1 =F7=D3=A3 =DC=D4=CF =D5=D3=CB=CF=D2=D1=C5=D4 =D0=D2=CF=C3=C5=D3=D3 = =D0=C5=D2=C5=C7=CF=D7=CF=D2=CF=D7 =C9 =D5=D4=D7=C5=D2=D6=C4=C5=CE=C9=D1 = =CD=C1=CB=C5=D4=CF=D7!! =20

=EF=D4=D2=C1=D3=CC=C5=D7=D9=C5 =D7=D9=C2=CF=D2=CB=C9 =

=EC=C0=C2=C1=D1 =C6=CF=D2=CD=C1 =CF=D0=CC=C1=D4=D9 =

O=D4=DE=C5=D4=D9 =D3 =D3=C5=D2=D7=C5=D2=C1 =

=F3=CF=C2=CC=C0=C4=C5=CE=C9=C5 =D3=D2=CF=CB=CF=D7 =

=E7=C1=D2=C1=CE=D4=C9=D2=CF=D7=C1=CE=CE=C1=D1 = =C4=CF=D3=D4=C1=D7=CB=C1 =D0=C9=D3=C5=CD =E1=EB=E3=E9=E9 =C9 = =F3=EB=E9=E4=EB=E9. =F7=D3=C5 =DC=D4=CF =C4=C1=C5=D4 =CE=C1=CD = =CF=D4=CC=C9=DE=CE=D9=CA =D2=C5=DA=D5=CC=D8=D4=C1=D4! =F7=CF=DA=CD=CF=D6=CE=CF=D3=D4=D8 = =D3=CF=D7=D2=C5=CD=C5=CE=CE=D9=C8 =D4=C5=C8=CE=CF=CC=CF=C7=C9=CA =C9 = =CB=D7=C1=CC=C9=C6=C9=CB=C1=C3=C9=D1 =CE=C1=DB=C9=C8 = =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=CB=CF=D7, =D0=CF=DA=D7=CF=CC=D1=C0=D4 = =D7=C5=D3=D4=C9 =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=CF = =D5=C4=C1=CC=A3=CE=CE=CF, =CE=C5 =D4=D2=C1=D4=D1 =D7=D2=C5=CD=D1 =CE=C1 = =CE=C5=CE=D5=D6=CE=D9=C5 =D0=CF=C5=DA=C4=CB=C9! =F6=C5=CC=C1=C5=CD =D0=D2=C5=D5=D3=D0=C5=D7=C1=CE=C9=D1 = =F7=C1=DB=C5=CD=D5 =C2=C9=DA=CE=C5=D3=D5 =C9 = =C2=CC=C1=C7=CF=C4=C1=D2=C9=CD =DA=C1 = =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=CF! (495) 585m 42 :92 =EE=C1=DB=C9 =D3=D4=C1=D2=C1=CE=C9=D1 =CE=C5 = =CF=D3=D4=C1=CC=C9=D3=D8 =C2=C5=DA =CF=C3=C5=CE=CB=C9, = =D4=C1=CB =CB=C1=CB =DA=C1 =D7=DA=C1=C9=CD=CF=C4=C5=CA=D3=D4=D7=C9=C5 = =C9 =CB=C1=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=C5=CE=CE=D5=C0 =D2=C1=C2=CF=D4=D5 = =D0=CF=CC=D5=DE=C5=CE=D9 =C2=CC=C1=C7=CF=C4=C1=D2=CE=CF=D3=D4=C9. ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C9111E.06BF7D73 Content-Type: text/html; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=F0=CF=CC=D5=DE=C9=D4=C5 =CD=C7=CE=CF=D7=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =D2=C5=DA=D5=CC=D8=D4=C1=D4! = =F2=C1=D3=D3=D9=CC=CB=C9!!!

=EE=C1=DB=C1 =CB=CF=CD=C1=CE=C4=C1 –=20 =CD=CF=DD=CE=D9=CA =C7=C5=CE=C5=D2=C1=D4=CF=D2 = =CB=D2=C5=C1=D4=C9=D7=CE=D9=C8 =C9=C4=C5=CA =C9 = =D2=C1=C3=C9=CF=CE=C1=CC=D8=CE=D9=C8 =D2=C5=DB=C5=CE=C9=CA, = =D0=CF=DC=D4=CF=CD=D5 =D3 =CE=C1=CD=C9=20 =D7=D9=C7=CF=C4=CE=CF =C9 =D5=C4=CF=C2=CE=CF = =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C1=D4=D8!

=F7=F9 =EB=E1=EB =F5=F3=F0=E5=FB=EE=F9=E5=20 =EC=E0=E4=E9 =CF=C2=D1=DA=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8=CE=CF = =C4=CF=CC=D6=CE=D9 =D7=CF=D3=D0=CF=CC=D8=DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=D8=D3=D1 = e-mail =D2.=C1.=D3.=D3.=D9.=CC.=CB.=CF.=CA=20
=D0=CF=D4=CF=CD=D5 =DE=D4=CF =DC=D4=CF = =F7=F9=F3=EF=EB=EF=FC=E6=E6=E5=EB=F4=E9=F7=EE=F9=EA =D3=D0=CF=D3=CF=C2 = =C4=CF=CE=C5=D3=C5=CE=C9=D1 =C9=CE=C6=CF=D2=CD=C1=C3=C9=C9 =CF=20 =F7=C1=DB=C9=C8 = =D5=D3=CC=D5=C7=C1=C8!

=ED=D9 = =D0=CF=CD=CF=C7=C1=C5=CD =CE=C1=DB=C9=CD =CB=CC=C9=C5=CE=D4=C1=CD = =C4=CF=C2=C9=D4=D8=D3=D1=20 =CE=CF=D7=D9=C8 =CB=CF=CE=CB=D5=D2=C5=CE=D4=CE=D9=C8 = =D0=D2=C5=C9=CD=D5=DD=C5=D3=D4=D7, = =D3=CC=C5=C4=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8=CE=CF, = =CF=C2=D2=C1=D4=C9=D7=DB=C9=D3=D8 =CB =CE=C1=CD =F7=D9=20 =D3=C4=C5=CC=C1=CC=C9 =D0=D2=C1=D7=C9=CC=D8=CE=D9=CA = =D7=D9=C2=CF=D2!!

=F0=D2=CF=D3=D4=CF = =C4=CF=C2=C1=D7=D8=D4=C5 =CB =F7=C1=DB=C9=CD = =D0=CF=D3=D4=CF=D1=CE=CE=D9=CD=20 =D2=C5=CB=CC=C1=CD=CE=D9=CD =D0=D2=CF=C5=CB=D4=C1=CD e-mail = =D2=C1=D3=D3=D9=CC=CB=D5 – =DC=D4=CF =CE=C1=C9=C2=CF=CC=C5=C5 = =D0=D2=C1=D7=C9=CC=D8=CE=D9=CA =C8=CF=C4, =D4=C1=CB =CB=C1=CB=20 =DA=C1=D4=D2=C1=D4=D9 =CE=C1 =DC=D4=CF=D4 =D7=C9=C4 = =D2=C5=CB=CC=C1=CD=D9 =CE=C5=D3=D2=C1=D7=CE=C9=CD=CF = =CD=C1=CC=D9!

=F5=D3=CB=CF=D2=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =C4=CF=CB=D5=CD=C5=CE=D4=CF=CF=C2=CF=D2=CF=D4

=E2=D9=D3=D4=D2=C1=D1 = =CF=C2=D2=C1=C2=CF=D4=CB=C1 =C9=CE=C6=CF=D2=CD=C1=C3=C9=C9 =

=F0=D2=C5=C4=CF=D3=D4=C1=D7=CC=C5=CE=C9=C5 = =D0=C5=D2=D3=CF=CE=C1=CC=D8=CE=CF=C7=CF = =CD=C5=CE=C5=C4=D6=C5=D2=C1

=F7=D3=A3 =DC=D4=CF=20 =D5=D3=CB=CF=D2=D1=C5=D4 =D0=D2=CF=C3=C5=D3=D3 = =D0=C5=D2=C5=C7=CF=D7=CF=D2=CF=D7 =C9 =D5=D4=D7=C5=D2=D6=C4=C5=CE=C9=D1 = =CD=C1=CB=C5=D4=CF=D7!!=20

=EF=D4=D2=C1=D3=CC=C5=D7=D9=C5 =D7=D9=C2=CF=D2=CB=C9 =

=EC=C0=C2=C1=D1 =C6=CF=D2=CD=C1 =CF=D0=CC=C1=D4=D9 =

O=D4=DE=C5=D4=D9 =D3 =D3=C5=D2=D7=C5=D2=C1 =

=F3=CF=C2=CC=C0=C4=C5=CE=C9=C5 =D3=D2=CF=CB=CF=D7 =

=E7=C1=D2=C1=CE=D4=C9=D2=CF=D7=C1=CE=CE=C1=D1 = =C4=CF=D3=D4=C1=D7=CB=C1 =D0=C9=D3=C5=CD

=E1=EB=E3=E9=E9 =C9 = =F3=EB=E9=E4=EB=E9.

=F7=D3=C5 =DC=D4=CF =C4=C1=C5=D4 =CE=C1=CD=20 =CF=D4=CC=C9=DE=CE=D9=CA = =D2=C5=DA=D5=CC=D8=D4=C1=D4!

=F7=CF=DA=CD=CF=D6=CE=CF=D3=D4=D8=20 =D3=CF=D7=D2=C5=CD=C5=CE=CE=D9=C8 =D4=C5=C8=CE=CF=CC=CF=C7=C9=CA = =C9 =CB=D7=C1=CC=C9=C6=C9=CB=C1=C3=C9=D1 =CE=C1=DB=C9=C8 = =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=CB=CF=D7, =D0=CF=DA=D7=CF=CC=D1=C0=D4 = =D7=C5=D3=D4=C9=20 =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=CF = =D5=C4=C1=CC=A3=CE=CE=CF, =CE=C5 =D4=D2=C1=D4=D1 =D7=D2=C5=CD=D1 =CE=C1 = =CE=C5=CE=D5=D6=CE=D9=C5=20 =D0=CF=C5=DA=C4=CB=C9!

=F6=C5=CC=C1=C5=CD = =D0=D2=C5=D5=D3=D0=C5=D7=C1=CE=C9=D1 =F7=C1=DB=C5=CD=D5=20 =C2=C9=DA=CE=C5=D3=D5 =C9 =C2=CC=C1=C7=CF=C4=C1=D2=C9=CD =DA=C1 = =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=CF!

(495) 585m 42 :92

=EE=C1=DB=C9 = =D3=D4=C1=D2=C1=CE=C9=D1 =CE=C5 =CF=D3=D4=C1=CC=C9=D3=D8 =C2=C5=DA=20 =CF=C3=C5=CE=CB=C9, =D4=C1=CB =CB=C1=CB =DA=C1 = =D7=DA=C1=C9=CD=CF=C4=C5=CA=D3=D4=D7=C9=C5 =C9 = =CB=C1=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=C5=CE=CE=D5=C0 =D2=C1=C2=CF=D4=D5 = =D0=CF=CC=D5=DE=C5=CE=D9=20 =C2=CC=C1=C7=CF=C4=C1=D2=CE=CF=D3=D4=C9.

<= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C9111E.06BF7D73-- Acknowledgement sent to Д. Успенский <wandojo@barbf.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>. -t Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94._?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A3=D1=81=D0=BF=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9?= Subject: Bug#91311: Info received (1// =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A0=D0=B5=D0=B0=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D0=B0=D1=8F!_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=89=D1=8C!//iii)?= Message-ID: References: <000501c9111e$06c4859a$ac7f3088@njjpxkw> X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 91311 X-Debian-PR-Package: libc6-dev X-Debian-PR-Keywords: wontfix X-Debian-PR-Source: glibc Reply-To: 91311@bugs.debian.org Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): GNU Libc Maintainers If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 91311@bugs.debian.org, as before. Please do not send mail to owner@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. --=20 91311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D91311 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems Received: (at 91311) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2008 19:24:53 +0000 From wandojo@barbf.com Sun Sep 07 19:24:53 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rietz.debian.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.5 required=4.0 tests=MULTALT,NEXTPART autolearn=no version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Return-path: Received: from [85.110.143.165] by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPlM-0001nK-Fg for 91311@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:17:39 +0000 Message-ID: <000501c9111e$06c4859a$ac7f3088@njjpxkw> From: =?koi8-r?B?5C4g9dPQxc7Ty8nK?= To: =?koi8-r?B?58XOzsHEyco=?= <91311@bugs.debian.org> Subject: =?koi8-r?B?MS8vIPLFwczYzsHRISDwz83P3dghLy9paWk=?= Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:30:06 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0002_01C9111E.06BF7D73" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C9111E.06BF7D73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =F0=CF=CC=D5=DE=C9=D4=C5 =CD=C7=CE=CF=D7=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =D2=C5=DA=D5=CC=D8=D4=C1=D4! =F2=C1=D3=D3=D9=CC=CB=C9!!! =EE=C1=DB=C1 =CB=CF=CD=C1=CE=C4=C1 – = =CD=CF=DD=CE=D9=CA =C7=C5=CE=C5=D2=C1=D4=CF=D2 = =CB=D2=C5=C1=D4=C9=D7=CE=D9=C8 =C9=C4=C5=CA =C9 = =D2=C1=C3=C9=CF=CE=C1=CC=D8=CE=D9=C8 =D2=C5=DB=C5=CE=C9=CA, = =D0=CF=DC=D4=CF=CD=D5 =D3 =CE=C1=CD=C9 =D7=D9=C7=CF=C4=CE=CF =C9 = =D5=C4=CF=C2=CE=CF =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C1=D4=D8! =F7=F9 =EB=E1=EB =F5=F3=F0=E5=FB=EE=F9=E5 =EC=E0=E4=E9 = =CF=C2=D1=DA=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8=CE=CF =C4=CF=CC=D6=CE=D9 = =D7=CF=D3=D0=CF=CC=D8=DA=CF=D7=C1=D4=D8=D3=D1 e-mail = =D2.=C1.=D3.=D3.=D9.=CC.=CB.=CF.=CA =20 =D0=CF=D4=CF=CD=D5 =DE=D4=CF =DC=D4=CF = =F7=F9=F3=EF=EB=EF=FC=E6=E6=E5=EB=F4=E9=F7=EE=F9=EA =D3=D0=CF=D3=CF=C2 = =C4=CF=CE=C5=D3=C5=CE=C9=D1 =C9=CE=C6=CF=D2=CD=C1=C3=C9=C9 =CF = =F7=C1=DB=C9=C8 =D5=D3=CC=D5=C7=C1=C8! =ED=D9 =D0=CF=CD=CF=C7=C1=C5=CD =CE=C1=DB=C9=CD = =CB=CC=C9=C5=CE=D4=C1=CD =C4=CF=C2=C9=D4=D8=D3=D1 =CE=CF=D7=D9=C8 = =CB=CF=CE=CB=D5=D2=C5=CE=D4=CE=D9=C8 =D0=D2=C5=C9=CD=D5=DD=C5=D3=D4=D7, = =D3=CC=C5=C4=CF=D7=C1=D4=C5=CC=D8=CE=CF, = =CF=C2=D2=C1=D4=C9=D7=DB=C9=D3=D8 =CB =CE=C1=CD =F7=D9 = =D3=C4=C5=CC=C1=CC=C9 =D0=D2=C1=D7=C9=CC=D8=CE=D9=CA =D7=D9=C2=CF=D2!! =F0=D2=CF=D3=D4=CF =C4=CF=C2=C1=D7=D8=D4=C5 =CB =F7=C1=DB=C9=CD = =D0=CF=D3=D4=CF=D1=CE=CE=D9=CD =D2=C5=CB=CC=C1=CD=CE=D9=CD = =D0=D2=CF=C5=CB=D4=C1=CD e-mail =D2=C1=D3=D3=D9=CC=CB=D5 – = =DC=D4=CF =CE=C1=C9=C2=CF=CC=C5=C5 =D0=D2=C1=D7=C9=CC=D8=CE=D9=CA = =C8=CF=C4, =D4=C1=CB =CB=C1=CB =DA=C1=D4=D2=C1=D4=D9 =CE=C1 = =DC=D4=CF=D4 =D7=C9=C4 =D2=C5=CB=CC=C1=CD=D9 = =CE=C5=D3=D2=C1=D7=CE=C9=CD=CF =CD=C1=CC=D9!

=F5=D3=CB=CF=D2=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =C4=CF=CB=D5=CD=C5=CE=D4=CF=CF=C2=CF=D2=CF=D4

=E2=D9=D3=D4=D2=C1=D1 = =CF=C2=D2=C1=C2=CF=D4=CB=C1 =C9=CE=C6=CF=D2=CD=C1=C3=C9=C9 =

=EF=D4=D2=C1=D3=CC=C5=D7=D9=C5 =D7=D9=C2=CF=D2=CB=C9 =

=EC=C0=C2=C1=D1 =C6=CF=D2=CD=C1 =CF=D0=CC=C1=D4=D9 =

O=D4=DE=C5=D4=D9 =D3 =D3=C5=D2=D7=C5=D2=C1 =

=F3=CF=C2=CC=C0=C4=C5=CE=C9=C5 =D3=D2=CF=CB=CF=D7 =

=F0=CF=CC=D5=DE=C9=D4=C5 =CD=C7=CE=CF=D7=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =D2=C5=DA=D5=CC=D8=D4=C1=D4! = =F2=C1=D3=D3=D9=CC=CB=C9!!!

=F5=D3=CB=CF=D2=C5=CE=CE=D9=CA = =C4=CF=CB=D5=CD=C5=CE=D4=CF=CF=C2=CF=D2=CF=D4

=E2=D9=D3=D4=D2=C1=D1 = =CF=C2=D2=C1=C2=CF=D4=CB=C1 =C9=CE=C6=CF=D2=CD=C1=C3=C9=C9 =

=EF=D4=D2=C1=D3=CC=C5=D7=D9=C5 =D7=D9=C2=CF=D2=CB=C9 =

=EC=C0=C2=C1=D1 =C6=CF=D2=CD=C1 =CF=D0=CC=C1=D4=D9 =

O=D4=DE=C5=D4=D9 =D3 =D3=C5=D2=D7=C5=D2=C1 =

=F3=CF=C2=CC=C0=C4=C5=CE=C9=C5 =D3=D2=CF=CB=CF=D7 =

=E7=C1=D2=C1=CE=D4=C9=D2=CF=D7=C1=CE=CE=C1=D1 = =C4=CF=D3=D4=C1=D7=CB=C1 =D0=C9=D3=C5=CD

=E1=EB=E3=E9=E9 =C9 = =F3=EB=E9=E4=EB=E9.

=F7=D3=C5 =DC=D4=CF =C4=C1=C5=D4 =CE=C1=CD=20 =CF=D4=CC=C9=DE=CE=D9=CA = =D2=C5=DA=D5=CC=D8=D4=C1=D4!

=F6=C5=CC=C1=C5=CD = =D0=D2=C5=D5=D3=D0=C5=D7=C1=CE=C9=D1 =F7=C1=DB=C5=CD=D5=20 =C2=C9=DA=CE=C5=D3=D5 =C9 =C2=CC=C1=C7=CF=C4=C1=D2=C9=CD =DA=C1 = =D3=CF=D4=D2=D5=C4=CE=C9=DE=C5=D3=D4=D7=CF!

(495) 585m 42 :92

<= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_0002_01C9111E.06BF7D73--