<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#85911: couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo(AF_INET) on dante-client
Reply-To: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 04:18:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B.98212380027608@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.98212380027608
          (code B ref -1); Wed, 14 Feb 2001 04:18:02 GMT
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:10:54 +0900
Message-ID: <87lmr9c3ap.wl@lichee.ukai.org>
From: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
Organization: Debian JP Project
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: dante-client
Version: 1.1.6-1

I couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo() with AF_INET via dante,
although AF_UNSPEC works.
I can't go out socks by ssh with socksify, since ssh uses
getaddrinfo() with AF_INET (default and -4 option) and no way to
with AF_UNSPEC.

For example,

% cat s.c
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netdb.h>

int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{       
	/* arg: <host> <port> <ai_family> */
        struct addrinfo hints, *aitop;
        int gaierr;
        memset(&hints, 0, sizeof(hints));
        hints.ai_family = atoi(argv[3]);
        hints.ai_socktype = SOCK_STREAM;
        gaierr = getaddrinfo(argv[1], argv[2], &hints, &aitop);
        printf("%d %s:%s => %d (%s)\n", 
	    atoi(argv[3]), argv[1], argv[2], gaierr, gai_strerror(gaierr));
        exit(0);
}
% cc s.c

% ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 0
0 auric.debian.org:22 => 0 (Unknown error)
# OK: without socksify, no problem for AF_UNSPEC (0)

% ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 2
2 auric.debian.org:22 => 0 (Unknown error)
# OK: without socksify, no problem for AF_INET (2)

% ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 10
10 auric.debian.org:22 => -2 (Name or service not known)
# OK: for AF_INET6 (10), of course error since auric.debian.org has no AAAA

% socksify ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 0
0 auric.debian.org:22 => 0 (Unknown error)
# OK: with socksify, it also works for AF_UNSPEC (0)

% socksify ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 2
2 auric.debian.org:22 => -2 (Name or service not known)
# Err: with socksify, unfortunately it failed for AF_INET (2) why?

% socksify ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 10
10 auric.debian.org:22 => -2 (Name or service not known)
# OK: of course error, with and without AF_INET6 (10)

Is this my configuration problem? Where should I check?

Regards,
Fumitoshi UKAI




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Fumitoshi UKAI &lt;ukai@debian.or.jp&gt;</code>:<br>
New Bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Subject: Bug#85911: Acknowledgement (couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo(AF_INET) on dante-client)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B.98212380027608.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <87lmr9c3ap.wl@lichee.ukai.org>
References: <87lmr9c3ap.wl@lichee.ukai.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 85911

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 85911@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2001 04:10:00 +0000
From ukai@debian.or.jp Tue Feb 13 22:10:00 2001
Return-path: <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Received: from palrel1.hp.com [::ffff:156.153.255.242] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14StGS-0007BB-00; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:10:00 -0600
Received: from mail.jp.hpl.hp.com (jasmine.jp.hpl.hp.com [15.12.216.3])
	by palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D3AE0C
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lichee.ukai.org.ukai.org (ukai@d1025.jp.hpl.hp.com [15.12.221.25])
	by mail.jp.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id MAA29278
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 12:55:33 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:10:54 +0900
Message-ID: <87lmr9c3ap.wl@lichee.ukai.org>
From: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo(AF_INET) on dante-client
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
Organization: Debian JP Project
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: dante-client
Version: 1.1.6-1

I couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo() with AF_INET via dante,
although AF_UNSPEC works.
I can't go out socks by ssh with socksify, since ssh uses
getaddrinfo() with AF_INET (default and -4 option) and no way to
with AF_UNSPEC.

For example,

% cat s.c
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netdb.h>

int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{       
	/* arg: <host> <port> <ai_family> */
        struct addrinfo hints, *aitop;
        int gaierr;
        memset(&hints, 0, sizeof(hints));
        hints.ai_family = atoi(argv[3]);
        hints.ai_socktype = SOCK_STREAM;
        gaierr = getaddrinfo(argv[1], argv[2], &hints, &aitop);
        printf("%d %s:%s => %d (%s)\n", 
	    atoi(argv[3]), argv[1], argv[2], gaierr, gai_strerror(gaierr));
        exit(0);
}
% cc s.c

% ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 0
0 auric.debian.org:22 => 0 (Unknown error)
# OK: without socksify, no problem for AF_UNSPEC (0)

% ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 2
2 auric.debian.org:22 => 0 (Unknown error)
# OK: without socksify, no problem for AF_INET (2)

% ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 10
10 auric.debian.org:22 => -2 (Name or service not known)
# OK: for AF_INET6 (10), of course error since auric.debian.org has no AAAA

% socksify ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 0
0 auric.debian.org:22 => 0 (Unknown error)
# OK: with socksify, it also works for AF_UNSPEC (0)

% socksify ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 2
2 auric.debian.org:22 => -2 (Name or service not known)
# Err: with socksify, unfortunately it failed for AF_INET (2) why?

% socksify ./a.out auric.debian.org 22 10
10 auric.debian.org:22 => -2 (Name or service not known)
# OK: of course error, with and without AF_INET6 (10)

Is this my configuration problem? Where should I check?

Regards,
Fumitoshi UKAI




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

Subject: Bug#85911: dante: couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo for AF_INET
Reply-To: adrian.bridgett@iname.com, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian.bridgett@iname.com>
Orignal-Sender: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@wyvern>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:11:50 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.9850418485446@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 85911-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.9850418485446
          (code B ref 85911); Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:11:50 GMT
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:40:45 +0000
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Message-ID: <20010319224045.A14937@wyvern>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian.bridgett@iname.com>
Sender: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@wyvern>
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Great debugging - much appreciated.

Just a note for when I get time to look further into this - dante doesn't
touch getaddrinfo.  I must pull off the glibc source code and see what it
maps to underneath.

FYI I have used nslookup on the name then "socksify ssh ip.add.re.ss" to get
though in the past.

Adrian

Email: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux  -*-  By professionals for professionals  -*-  www.debian.org




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>adrian.bridgett@iname.com</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (was dante: couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo for AF_INET)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.9850418485446.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010319224045.A14937@wyvern>
References: <20010319224045.A14937@wyvern>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info-maintonly 85911

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2001 22:44:08 +0000
From adrian.bridgett@iname.com Mon Mar 19 16:44:08 2001
Return-path: <adrian.bridgett@iname.com>
Received: from mail11.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.23] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14f8Nk-0001Pb-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:44:08 -0600
Received: from modem-73.pearly-jawfish.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.48.201] helo=wyvern)
	by mail11.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0)
	id 14f8Nh-0006AH-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:44:06 +0000
Received: from bridgett by wyvern with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14f8KT-0003t7-00; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:40:45 +0000
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:40:45 +0000
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Subject: Re: dante: couldn't resolv by getaddrinfo for AF_INET
Message-ID: <20010319224045.A14937@wyvern>
Reply-To: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian.bridgett@iname.com>
Sender: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@wyvern>
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Great debugging - much appreciated.

Just a note for when I get time to look further into this - dante doesn't
touch getaddrinfo.  I must pull off the glibc source code and see what it
maps to underneath.

FYI I have used nslookup on the name then "socksify ssh ip.add.re.ss" to get
though in the past.

Adrian

Email: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux  -*-  By professionals for professionals  -*-  www.debian.org




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>dante@packages.qa.debian.org

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#85911: Also observing this behaviour
Reply-To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Original-Sender: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>, dante@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:03:06 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104135004518127@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 85911-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.104135004518127
          (code B ref 85911); Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:03:06 GMT
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:53:52 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20021231155351.GA16779@centauri.maitland>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

I've just started observing this behaviour as well (at least down to the
level that AF_UNSPEC will resolve, but AF_INET doesn't), on

$ uname -a
Linux centauri 2.4.19 #15 Thu Aug 22 21:29:36 BST 2002 alpha unknown unknown GNU/Linux

with 

$ dpkg -l dante-client libc6.1
ii  dante-client   1.1.11.12p1-4  Provides a SOCKS wrapper for users behind a
ii  libc6.1        2.3.1-8        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

I didn't see this effect with libc6.1 2.3.1-6, which would certainly
lead me to guess that the change which triggered this was (from
libc6.1 2.3.1-8's changelog):

    - debian/patches/glibc23-getaddrinfo.dpatch: Add getaddrinfo patch
      from CVS (Closes: #174027).

I don't have a sufficient handle on what's going on here to know whether
this is a bug in dante, glibc or just an unfortunate interaction
somewhere. I'll try playing with upstream's 1.1.13 and see what
behaviour I get there.

Cheers,

Phil

-- 
"So that's the end. Our life in Roswell: what a long, strange trip it's
been. Will we ever go back? I don't know; even I can't see everything in
the future. All I know is that I'm Liz Parker, and I'm happy."
                                                 Liz: Roswell: Graduation




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Philip Kendall &lt;pak21@srcf.ucam.org&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (was Also observing this behaviour)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104135004518127.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20021231155351.GA16779@centauri.maitland>
References: <20021231155351.GA16779@centauri.maitland>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 85911
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2002 15:54:05 +0000
From pak21@srcf.ucam.org Tue Dec 31 09:54:04 2002
Return-path: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18TOiS-0004iA-00; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:54:04 -0600
Received: from centauri.maitland ([81.96.65.128]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20021231155402.WTYZ22267.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@centauri.maitland>
          for <85911@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:54:02 +0000
Received: from pak21 by centauri.maitland with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18TOiG-0004NK-00
	for <85911@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:53:52 +0000
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:53:52 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Also observing this behaviour
Message-ID: <20021231155351.GA16779@centauri.maitland>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

I've just started observing this behaviour as well (at least down to the
level that AF_UNSPEC will resolve, but AF_INET doesn't), on

$ uname -a
Linux centauri 2.4.19 #15 Thu Aug 22 21:29:36 BST 2002 alpha unknown unknown GNU/Linux

with 

$ dpkg -l dante-client libc6.1
ii  dante-client   1.1.11.12p1-4  Provides a SOCKS wrapper for users behind a
ii  libc6.1        2.3.1-8        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

I didn't see this effect with libc6.1 2.3.1-6, which would certainly
lead me to guess that the change which triggered this was (from
libc6.1 2.3.1-8's changelog):

    - debian/patches/glibc23-getaddrinfo.dpatch: Add getaddrinfo patch
      from CVS (Closes: #174027).

I don't have a sufficient handle on what's going on here to know whether
this is a bug in dante, glibc or just an unfortunate interaction
somewhere. I'll try playing with upstream's 1.1.13 and see what
behaviour I get there.

Cheers,

Phil

-- 
"So that's the end. Our life in Roswell: what a long, strange trip it's
been. Will we ever go back? I don't know; even I can't see everything in
the future. All I know is that I'm Liz Parker, and I'm happy."
                                                 Liz: Roswell: Graduation




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>dante@packages.qa.debian.org

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#85911: dante: AF_INET doesn't work
Reply-To: adrian.bridgett@iname.com, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>, dante@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 21:33:10 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104180176310448@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 85911-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.104180176310448
          (code B ref 85911); Sun, 05 Jan 2003 21:33:10 GMT
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:22:15 +0000
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20030105212215.GA31745@wyvern.smop.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.6, required 5,
	SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT)
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Write up of what I've found so far.   If you pull down the glibc code and
look at the getaddrinfo function you will see a macro called gethosts. 

This macro does a call to gethostbyname2_r - it is this call which is
failing when it is socksified.  If you do a gethostbyname2 just beforehand,
then that works fine (and oddly enough, the gethostbyname2_r call works too
- presumeably it's a shared area).  If you do a gethostbyname2 afterwards,
then the gethostbyname2_r call fails (since the shared areas has not been
setup) and then the gethostbyname2 call works.

glibc/inet/gethstbynm2_r.c is where gethostbyname2_r is made (via some
macros).  I don't know how we can get dante to jump in on the calls that
makes - definitely _way_ beyond me.  

Adrian

Email: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux  -*-  By professionals for professionals  -*-  www.debian.org




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>adrian.bridgett@iname.com</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (was dante: AF_INET doesn't work)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104180176310448.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030105212215.GA31745@wyvern.smop.co.uk>
References: <20030105212215.GA31745@wyvern.smop.co.uk>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 85911
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2003 21:22:43 +0000
From adrian@smop.co.uk Sun Jan 05 15:22:42 2003
Return-path: <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Received: from 213-152-32-77.dsl.eclipse.net.uk (localhost) [213.152.32.77] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18VIED-0002iH-00; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 15:22:41 -0600
Received: from wyvern.smop.co.uk ([192.168.8.2] ident=mail)
	by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18VIE4-0002vm-00
	for 85911@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 21:22:32 +0000
Received: from adrian by wyvern.smop.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18VIDn-0008Jo-00
	for <85911@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 21:22:15 +0000
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:22:15 +0000
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: dante: AF_INET doesn't work
Message-ID: <20030105212215.GA31745@wyvern.smop.co.uk>
Reply-To: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.6, required 5,
	SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT)
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Write up of what I've found so far.   If you pull down the glibc code and
look at the getaddrinfo function you will see a macro called gethosts. 

This macro does a call to gethostbyname2_r - it is this call which is
failing when it is socksified.  If you do a gethostbyname2 just beforehand,
then that works fine (and oddly enough, the gethostbyname2_r call works too
- presumeably it's a shared area).  If you do a gethostbyname2 afterwards,
then the gethostbyname2_r call fails (since the shared areas has not been
setup) and then the gethostbyname2 call works.

glibc/inet/gethstbynm2_r.c is where gethostbyname2_r is made (via some
macros).  I don't know how we can get dante to jump in on the calls that
makes - definitely _way_ beyond me.  

Adrian

Email: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux  -*-  By professionals for professionals  -*-  www.debian.org




<strong>Merged 85911 175928.</strong>
Request was from <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;adrian@smop.co.uk&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2003 19:50:36 +0000
From adrian@smop.co.uk Thu Jan 09 13:50:35 2003
Return-path: <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Received: from 213-152-32-77.dsl.eclipse.net.uk (localhost) [213.152.32.77] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18WihH-0006uI-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 13:50:35 -0600
Received: from adrian by localhost with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18Wigy-00048g-00
	for control@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:50:16 +0000
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:50:16 +0000
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: dante problems with DNS
Message-ID: <20030109195016.GA15539@smop.co.uk>
Reply-To: adrian@smop.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin ()
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

merge 175928 85911
thanks

Email: adrian@smop.co.uk
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux  -*-  By professionals for professionals  -*-  www.debian.org




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>dante@packages.qa.debian.org

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine
Reply-To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Original-Sender: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>, dante@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:18:04 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104311133328732@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 85911-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.104311133328732
          (code B ref 85911); Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:18:04 GMT
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:08:46 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

ssh over socks has started working again on my machine:

centauri:pak21:~$ uname -a
Linux centauri 2.4.19 #15 Thu Aug 22 21:29:36 BST 2002 alpha unknown
unknown GNU/Linux

which is now running

centauri:pak21:~$ dpkg -l dante-client libc6.1
[...]
ii  dante-client   1.1.13-1       Provides a SOCKS wrapper for users behind a 
ii  libc6.1        2.3.1-9        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

My last two upgrades to the latest unstable were on 15 Jan, after which
I'm 90% sure ssh wasn't socksifing correctly, and today, when it is. The
obvious package which has changed in the meantime is ssh (which I now
have 3.5p1-4), but there doesn't appear to be anything in ssh's
changelog which springs out at me as being what caused this change.

Apologies for one of the world's less helpful bug reports.

Phil

-- 
"So that's the end. Our life in Roswell: what a long, strange trip it's
been. Will we ever go back? I don't know; even I can't see everything in
the future. All I know is that I'm Liz Parker, and I'm happy."
                                                 Liz: Roswell: Graduation




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Philip Kendall &lt;pak21@srcf.ucam.org&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (was Now apparently working on my machine)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104311133328732.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
References: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 85911
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2003 01:08:53 +0000
From pak21@srcf.ucam.org Mon Jan 20 19:08:51 2003
Return-path: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18amuJ-0007TB-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:08:51 -0600
Received: from centauri.maitland ([81.96.65.128]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20030121010849.IRYK14589.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@centauri.maitland>
          for <85911@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:08:49 +0000
Received: from pak21 by centauri.maitland with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18amuE-0003Zq-00
	for <85911@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:08:46 +0000
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:08:46 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Now apparently working on my machine
Message-ID: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

ssh over socks has started working again on my machine:

centauri:pak21:~$ uname -a
Linux centauri 2.4.19 #15 Thu Aug 22 21:29:36 BST 2002 alpha unknown
unknown GNU/Linux

which is now running

centauri:pak21:~$ dpkg -l dante-client libc6.1
[...]
ii  dante-client   1.1.13-1       Provides a SOCKS wrapper for users behind a 
ii  libc6.1        2.3.1-9        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone

My last two upgrades to the latest unstable were on 15 Jan, after which
I'm 90% sure ssh wasn't socksifing correctly, and today, when it is. The
obvious package which has changed in the meantime is ssh (which I now
have 3.5p1-4), but there doesn't appear to be anything in ssh's
changelog which springs out at me as being what caused this change.

Apologies for one of the world's less helpful bug reports.

Phil

-- 
"So that's the end. Our life in Roswell: what a long, strange trip it's
been. Will we ever go back? I don't know; even I can't see everything in
the future. All I know is that I'm Liz Parker, and I'm happy."
                                                 Liz: Roswell: Graduation




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>dante@packages.qa.debian.org

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine
Reply-To: adrian@smop.co.uk, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>, dante@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:03:04 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104318623330086@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 85911-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.104318623330086
          (code B ref 85911); Tue, 21 Jan 2003 22:03:04 GMT
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:57:00 +0000
To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
References: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-13.4, required 5,
	IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT)
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.4 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:08:46 +0000 (+0000), Philip Kendall wrote:
> ssh over socks has started working again on my machine:
[snip]
> ii  dante-client   1.1.13-1       Provides a SOCKS wrapper for users behind a 
> ii  libc6.1        2.3.1-9        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
> 
> My last two upgrades to the latest unstable were on 15 Jan, after which
> I'm 90% sure ssh wasn't socksifing correctly, and today, when it is. The
> obvious package which has changed in the meantime is ssh (which I now
> have 3.5p1-4), but there doesn't appear to be anything in ssh's
> changelog which springs out at me as being what caused this change.
> 
> Apologies for one of the world's less helpful bug reports.

Stuff like this is helpful :-)  There is a problem that I can recreate which
I'm trying to resolve, but it's really stretching my knowledge and I'm not
exactly sure what's going on.  

There were enough useful fixes in 1.1.13-1 (particularly in the server that
I wanted to release it - it was uploaded on 4th Jan - I don't suppose you
know if the new dante-client version helped?)

Adrian

Email: adrian@smop.co.uk
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux  -*-  By professionals for professionals  -*-  www.debian.org




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>adrian@smop.co.uk</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: adrian@smop.co.uk
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (was Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104318623330086.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
References: <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 85911
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2003 21:57:13 +0000
From adrian@smop.co.uk Tue Jan 21 15:57:12 2003
Return-path: <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Received: from 213-152-32-77.dsl.eclipse.net.uk (localhost) [213.152.32.77] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18b6OO-0007oz-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 15:57:12 -0600
Received: from adrian by localhost with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18b6OC-00063l-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:57:00 +0000
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:57:00 +0000
To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine
Message-ID: <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
Reply-To: adrian@smop.co.uk
References: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-13.4, required 5,
	IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_MUTT)
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.4 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:08:46 +0000 (+0000), Philip Kendall wrote:
> ssh over socks has started working again on my machine:
[snip]
> ii  dante-client   1.1.13-1       Provides a SOCKS wrapper for users behind a 
> ii  libc6.1        2.3.1-9        GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
> 
> My last two upgrades to the latest unstable were on 15 Jan, after which
> I'm 90% sure ssh wasn't socksifing correctly, and today, when it is. The
> obvious package which has changed in the meantime is ssh (which I now
> have 3.5p1-4), but there doesn't appear to be anything in ssh's
> changelog which springs out at me as being what caused this change.
> 
> Apologies for one of the world's less helpful bug reports.

Stuff like this is helpful :-)  There is a problem that I can recreate which
I'm trying to resolve, but it's really stretching my knowledge and I'm not
exactly sure what's going on.  

There were enough useful fixes in 1.1.13-1 (particularly in the server that
I wanted to release it - it was uploaded on 4th Jan - I don't suppose you
know if the new dante-client version helped?)

Adrian

Email: adrian@smop.co.uk
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. GPG/PGP keys available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux  -*-  By professionals for professionals  -*-  www.debian.org




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>dante@packages.qa.debian.org

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine
Reply-To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>, dante@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:03:06 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104324723820834@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 85911-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.104324723820834
          (code B ref 85911); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:03:06 GMT
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:53:56 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Cc: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri> <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.9 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:57:00PM +0000, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> 
> There were enough useful fixes in 1.1.13-1 (particularly in the server that
> I wanted to release it - it was uploaded on 4th Jan - I don't suppose you
> know if the new dante-client version helped?)

I don't think it did: I tried upstream's 1.1.13 before you released your
Debian package, and that didn't help, and I installed your package on 7
Jan (or about then; certainly that's the time my
/var/lib/dpkg/info/dante-client* were last accessed[1]) which didn't
help either. I'm pretty sure that things weren't working last weekend
(18/19th Jan), but I can't be 100% sure as I applied the hack of putting
IP addresses into my ~/.ssh/config for the machines I access most often.

What I'll try doing in the next couple of days (free time permitting,
etc) is downgrading to ssh 3.5p1-3 and seeing what effect that has.

Cheers,

Phil

-- 
"After taking such ... such care to hide what you really are, why take
that chance?" "It was necessary." "Well, as answers go, short to the
point, utterly useless and totally consistent, what I've come to expect
from a Vorlon." "Good."    Sheridan and Kosh: Babylon 5: Matters of Honor




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Philip Kendall &lt;pak21@srcf.ucam.org&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (was Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.104324723820834.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 85911
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2003 14:53:58 +0000
From pak21@srcf.ucam.org Wed Jan 22 08:53:58 2003
Return-path: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Received: from gold.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.12] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18bMGL-0005Pe-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:53:57 -0600
Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk
	([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk ident=mail)
	by gold.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18bMGL-0000GP-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:53:57 +0000
Received: from pak21 by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18bMGK-0002sY-00; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:53:56 +0000
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:53:56 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Cc: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine
Message-ID: <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri> <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.9 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 09:57:00PM +0000, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> 
> There were enough useful fixes in 1.1.13-1 (particularly in the server that
> I wanted to release it - it was uploaded on 4th Jan - I don't suppose you
> know if the new dante-client version helped?)

I don't think it did: I tried upstream's 1.1.13 before you released your
Debian package, and that didn't help, and I installed your package on 7
Jan (or about then; certainly that's the time my
/var/lib/dpkg/info/dante-client* were last accessed[1]) which didn't
help either. I'm pretty sure that things weren't working last weekend
(18/19th Jan), but I can't be 100% sure as I applied the hack of putting
IP addresses into my ~/.ssh/config for the machines I access most often.

What I'll try doing in the next couple of days (free time permitting,
etc) is downgrading to ssh 3.5p1-3 and seeing what effect that has.

Cheers,

Phil

-- 
"After taking such ... such care to hide what you really are, why take
that chance?" "It was necessary." "Well, as answers go, short to the
point, utterly useless and totally consistent, what I've come to expect
from a Vorlon." "Good."    Sheridan and Kosh: Babylon 5: Matters of Honor




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgAdrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>dante@packages.qa.debian.org

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine
Reply-To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>, dante@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:33:07 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.10437567623941@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 85911-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.10437567623941
          (code B ref 85911); Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:33:07 GMT
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:25:56 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Cc: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20030128122556.GA27192@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri> <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk> <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.4 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:53:56PM +0000, Philip Kendall wrote:
> 
> What I'll try doing in the next couple of days (free time permitting,
> etc) is downgrading to ssh 3.5p1-3 and seeing what effect that has.

I tried this (with a self-made package of ssh-3.5p1-3) and socksify ssh
still works. I'm pretty much stuck on this one -- if you have anything
you want me to test, let me know, but other than that I'm not intending
to investigate this one any further.

Cheers,

Phil

-- 
"But if you help me graduate this year, then you won't have to see me
next year."
"Well, you do have a point there."
                                Michael and Mr Seligman: Roswell: Busted!




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Philip Kendall &lt;pak21@srcf.ucam.org&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Adrian Bridgett &lt;bridgett@debian.org&gt;, dante@packages.qa.debian.org</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (was Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.10437567623941.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030128122556.GA27192@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <20030128122556.GA27192@srcf.ucam.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 85911
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Adrian Bridgett <bridgett@debian.org>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2003 12:26:02 +0000
From pak21@srcf.ucam.org Tue Jan 28 06:26:00 2003
Return-path: <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
Received: from brown.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.14] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18dUoS-0000zG-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 06:26:00 -0600
Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk
	([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk ident=mail)
	by brown.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 18dUoO-0008Rr-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:25:56 +0000
Received: from pak21 by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18dUoO-0007Rl-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:25:56 +0000
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:25:56 +0000
From: Philip Kendall <pak21@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Adrian Bridgett <adrian@smop.co.uk>
Cc: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#85911: Now apparently working on my machine
Message-ID: <20030128122556.GA27192@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <20030121010846.GA13299@centauri> <20030121215700.GB23259@smop.co.uk> <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030122145356.GA6859@srcf.ucam.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.4 required=5.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:53:56PM +0000, Philip Kendall wrote:
> 
> What I'll try doing in the next couple of days (free time permitting,
> etc) is downgrading to ssh 3.5p1-3 and seeing what effect that has.

I tried this (with a self-made package of ssh-3.5p1-3) and socksify ssh
still works. I'm pretty much stuck on this one -- if you have anything
you want me to test, let me know, but other than that I'm not intending
to investigate this one any further.

Cheers,

Phil

-- 
"But if you help me graduate this year, then you won't have to see me
next year."
"Well, you do have a point there."
                                Michael and Mr Seligman: Roswell: Busted!




<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Peter Pentchev &lt;roam@ringlet.net&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#85911</code>; Package <code>dante-client</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgPeter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#85911: Rare shark stolen from Dream world
Reply-To: Vilpponen <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>, 85911@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Vilpponen <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:45:22 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.121770251311820@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: dante
Received: via spool by 85911-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B85911.121770251311820
          (code B ref 85911); Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:45:22 +0000
Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2008 18:41:53 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(2006-07-26) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,OPERAMAIL 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from [77.222.17.226]
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>)
	id 1KPM36-0002xS-LZ
	for 85911@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:41:53 +0000
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
From:   Vilpponen <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:41:53 +0100
Message-ID: <ys.okpbztlqhmyrjc@PC249692138881>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.50 (Win32)

IBM decides to try to buy over Dell to lower manufacturing cost of PCs
http://www.glantaler.at/lol.html

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Vilpponen &lt;r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Peter Pentchev &lt;roam@ringlet.net&gt;</code>.


-t

Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Vilpponen <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>
Subject: Bug#85911: Info received (Rare shark stolen from Dream world)
Message-ID: <handler.85911.B85911.121770251311820.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
References: <ys.okpbztlqhmyrjc@PC249692138881>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 85911
X-Debian-PR-Package: dante-client
X-Debian-PR-Source: dante
Reply-To: 85911@bugs.debian.org


Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 85911@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not send mail to owner@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.


--=20
85911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D85911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems



Received: (at 85911) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2008 18:41:53 +0000
From r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com Sat Aug 02 18:41:53 2008
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(2006-07-26) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,OPERAMAIL 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>
Received: from [77.222.17.226]
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>)
	id 1KPM36-0002xS-LZ
	for 85911@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:41:53 +0000
To: 85911@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Rare shark stolen from Dream world
From:   Vilpponen <r-netman1983@eventconfidential.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Sat, 2 Aug 2008 19:41:53 +0100
Message-ID: <ys.okpbztlqhmyrjc@PC249692138881>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.50 (Win32)

IBM decides to try to buy over Dell to lower manufacturing cost of PCs
http://www.glantaler.at/lol.html

--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/