<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri &lt;md@linux.it&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#119002</code>; Package <code>gup</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgMarco d'Itri <md@linux.it>

Subject: Bug#119002: Aborts processing on error
Reply-To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, 119002@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:18:01 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.119002.B.100540524512163@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 119002
X-Debian-PR-Package: gup
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by submit@bugs.debian.org id=B.100540524512163
          (code B ref -1); Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:18:01 GMT
From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:11:24 +0000
Message-Id: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gup
Version: 0.5.7
Severity: normal

When GUP is sent an e-mail containing a syntax error it appears to abort
processing of the e-mail after that error.  This is unusual behaviour
for a mail-controlled program.  Normally one would expect the program to
complain about the offending line and move on, only aborting if a long
sequence of 

Even if GUP doesn't carry on after syntax errors it should at least
include the remaining lines of input in the e-mail returned to the user
so that the user can resubmit the valid commands - at present the
remaining lines of input are just discarded.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux homer 2.2.19 #2 Thu Apr 19 10:45:04 BST 2001 sparc
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages gup depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.4-1                           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  postfi 0.0.20010502.SNAPSHOT+tls-0.7.2-1 A high-performance mail transport 





<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Mark Brown &lt;broonie@sirena.org.uk&gt;</code>:<br>
New Bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>Marco d'Itri &lt;md@linux.it&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
Subject: Bug#119002: Acknowledgement (Aborts processing on error)
Message-ID: <handler.119002.B.100540524512163.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
References: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 119002
Reply-To: 119002@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 119002@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
submit@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2001 15:14:05 +0000
From broonie@mathie.cx Sat Nov 10 09:14:05 2001
Return-path: <broonie@mathie.cx>
Received: from homer.mathie.cx [62.189.57.194] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 162Zpd-0003A7-00; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:14:05 -0600
Received: by homer.mathie.cx (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id AA8FE13D95; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:11:26 +0000 (GMT)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Aborts processing on error
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:11:24 +0000
Message-Id: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gup
Version: 0.5.7
Severity: normal

When GUP is sent an e-mail containing a syntax error it appears to abort
processing of the e-mail after that error.  This is unusual behaviour
for a mail-controlled program.  Normally one would expect the program to
complain about the offending line and move on, only aborting if a long
sequence of 

Even if GUP doesn't carry on after syntax errors it should at least
include the remaining lines of input in the e-mail returned to the user
so that the user can resubmit the valid commands - at present the
remaining lines of input are just discarded.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux homer 2.2.19 #2 Thu Apr 19 10:45:04 BST 2001 sparc
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages gup depends on:
ii  libc6  2.2.4-1                           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  postfi 0.0.20010502.SNAPSHOT+tls-0.7.2-1 A high-performance mail transport 





<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco d'Itri &lt;md@linux.it&gt;, gup@packages.qa.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#119002</code>; Package <code>gup</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgMarco d'Itri <md@linux.it>gup@packages.qa.debian.org

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#119002: Aborts processing on error
Reply-To: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>, 119002@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>, gup@packages.qa.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:03:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.119002.B119002.1013910638667@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 119002
X-Debian-PR-Package: gup
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 119002-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B119002.1013910638667
          (code B ref 119002); Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:03:02 GMT
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 01:56:29 +0100
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, 119002@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <control@bugs.debian.org>
Message-ID: <20020217005629.GA19984@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Delivered-To: 119002@bugs.debian.org

severity 119002 wishlist
thanks

On Nov 10, Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk> wrote:

 >When GUP is sent an e-mail containing a syntax error it appears to abort
 >processing of the e-mail after that error.  This is unusual behaviour
 >for a mail-controlled program.  Normally one would expect the program to
 >complain about the offending line and move on, only aborting if a long
 >sequence of 
 >
 >Even if GUP doesn't carry on after syntax errors it should at least
 >include the remaining lines of input in the e-mail returned to the user
 >so that the user can resubmit the valid commands - at present the
 >remaining lines of input are just discarded.
Feel free to provide a patch, I will not fix this on my own.

-- 
ciao,
Marco




<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Marco d'Itri &lt;md@Linux.IT&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Marco d'Itri &lt;md@linux.it&gt;, gup@packages.qa.debian.org</code>.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Subject: Bug#119002: Info received (was Bug#119002: Aborts processing on error)
Message-ID: <handler.119002.B119002.1013910638667.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020217005629.GA19984@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <20020217005629.GA19984@wonderland.linux.it>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 119002
Disabled-Doogie-Reply-To: 119002@bugs.debian.org

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 119002@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Received: (at 119002) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2002 01:50:38 +0000
From md@linux.it Sat Feb 16 19:50:38 2002
Return-path: <md@linux.it>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16cGTO-0000Af-00; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:50:38 -0600
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 0CE5160B5D; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:50:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix/Md, from userid 1001)
	id 3BE02340B8; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 01:56:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 01:56:29 +0100
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, 119002@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <control@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#119002: Aborts processing on error
Message-ID: <20020217005629.GA19984@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Delivered-To: 119002@bugs.debian.org

severity 119002 wishlist
thanks

On Nov 10, Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk> wrote:

 >When GUP is sent an e-mail containing a syntax error it appears to abort
 >processing of the e-mail after that error.  This is unusual behaviour
 >for a mail-controlled program.  Normally one would expect the program to
 >complain about the offending line and move on, only aborting if a long
 >sequence of 
 >
 >Even if GUP doesn't carry on after syntax errors it should at least
 >include the remaining lines of input in the e-mail returned to the user
 >so that the user can resubmit the valid commands - at present the
 >remaining lines of input are just discarded.
Feel free to provide a patch, I will not fix this on my own.

-- 
ciao,
Marco




<strong>Severity set to `wishlist'.</strong>
Request was from <code>Marco d'Itri &lt;md@Linux.IT&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2002 01:50:38 +0000
From md@linux.it Sat Feb 16 19:50:38 2002
Return-path: <md@linux.it>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16cGTO-0000Af-00; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:50:38 -0600
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 0CE5160B5D; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 02:50:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix/Md, from userid 1001)
	id 3BE02340B8; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 01:56:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 01:56:29 +0100
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>, 119002@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <control@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#119002: Aborts processing on error
Message-ID: <20020217005629.GA19984@wonderland.linux.it>
References: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011110151126.AA8FE13D95@homer.mathie.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

severity 119002 wishlist
thanks

On Nov 10, Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk> wrote:

 >When GUP is sent an e-mail containing a syntax error it appears to abort
 >processing of the e-mail after that error.  This is unusual behaviour
 >for a mail-controlled program.  Normally one would expect the program to
 >complain about the offending line and move on, only aborting if a long
 >sequence of 
 >
 >Even if GUP doesn't carry on after syntax errors it should at least
 >include the remaining lines of input in the e-mail returned to the user
 >so that the user can resubmit the valid commands - at present the
 >remaining lines of input are just discarded.
Feel free to provide a patch, I will not fix this on my own.

-- 
ciao,
Marco




<strong>Tags added: help</strong>
Request was from <code>Marco d'Itri &lt;md@linux.it&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2002 19:06:30 +0000
From md@linux.it Sun Dec 29 13:06:30 2002
Return-path: <md@linux.it>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Sila-0007av-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 13:06:30 -0600
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 0FD135F73C; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 20:06:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix/Md, from userid 1001)
	id 8401333BEE; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:39:32 +0100 (CET)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tagging 119002
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:39:32 +0100
Message-Id: <20021229173932.8401333BEE@wonderland.linux.it>
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

tag 119002  help





<strong>Tags added: upstream</strong>
Request was from <code>Marco d'Itri &lt;md@linux.it&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2004 15:42:05 +0000
From md@linux.it Wed Sep 29 08:42:05 2004
Return-path: <md@linux.it>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CCgai-0000cj-00; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:42:05 -0700
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 30FC85F804; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 7539F1C03D; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:16:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tagging 119002
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:16:21 +0200
X-BTS-Version: 2.8.1
Message-Id: <20040929141621.7539F1C03D@wonderland.linux.it>
Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.1
tags 119002 upstream