Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 1996 19:27:48 +0000 Received: (qmail 22649 invoked from network); 28 Nov 1996 19:26:41 -0000 Received: from i17linuxb.ists.pwr.wroc.pl (root@156.17.35.8) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 1996 19:26:40 -0000 Received: by i17linuxb.ists.pwr.wroc.pl id m0vTBre-0007rWC (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #3); Thu, 28 Nov 1996 20:11:14 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <m0vTBre-0007rWC@i17linuxb.ists.pwr.wroc.pl> From: marekm@i17linuxb.ists.pwr.wroc.pl (Marek Michalkiewicz) Subject: Policy, compress, and X... To: submit@bugs.debian.org Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 20:11:13 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1693 Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.4.0.3 The policy manual says: packages where "the program cannot be compiled using only packages in the main Debian distribution" may only be placed in contrib. But, as it is now, X requires compress to build, and it is not in the main distribution due to US patent problems. Now, I don't think X should be placed in contrib just to meet policy requirements, especially since (again, according to the policy manual) any packages depending on X should then be in contrib as well... We have several options (besides moving X to contrib): - relax the policy a little - patch X to allow use of gzipped fonts (using zlib) - move the distribution to a country where LZW is not patented I guess the first option is easiest to implement right now, to make sure that the Debian 1.2 release doesn't contradict its own policy requirements. Hence, I'm reporting this as a bug in the dpkg-dev package which includes the policy manual. Changing the policy shouldn't break too many packages :-). Patching X to use zlib might be a good option if we didn't have the code freeze. How big is the necessary patch? It would be good, not just due to US patents - gzip has usually better compression and it would be nice to save some disk space. Moving the distribution would solve a few other problems as well (such as the ITAR munitions export restrictions), but is probably not something that can be done very quickly. Also, the policy manual doesn't say: the patent/copyright laws of which country should be used to decide if a package is freely distributable? (I'm assuming it's the country where ftp.debian.org is located - is this right? It does matter...) Marek