Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Hakan Ardo <hakan@debian.org>:
Bug#10294; Package addressbook.
debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgHakan Ardo <hakan@debian.org>
Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.
Acknowledgement sent to Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Hakan Ardo <hakan@debian.org>.
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 1997 15:38:24 +0000
Received: (qmail 21893 invoked from network); 2 Jun 1997 15:38:23 -0000
Received: from slip-124-16.ots.utexas.edu (HELO nevermore.csres.utexas.edu) (@128.83.221.160)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 1997 15:38:22 -0000
Received: (from osiris@localhost)
by nevermore.csres.utexas.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA00955;
Mon, 2 Jun 1997 10:47:10 -0500
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Executable names in addressbook are *much* too general.
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Rob Browning
Date: 02 Jun 1997 10:47:09 -0500
Message-ID: <87iuzx0zxq.fsf@nevermore.csres.utexas.edu>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.55/Emacs 19.34
Package: addressbook
Version: 0.6.1-1
I think that some, if not all, of these names are much too general.
Either addressbook should have a separate directory
/usr/bin/addressbook, or the names should be changed.
Using "email", "fax", and "letter", for example, seems a bit
presumptive.
/usr/bin/address
/usr/bin/address.awk
/usr/bin/address.perl
/usr/bin/birthday
/usr/bin/email
/usr/bin/fax
/usr/bin/letter
/usr/bin/tel
Thanks
--
Rob