Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 1997 16:43:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 11805 invoked from network); 24 May 1997 16:43:17 -0000 Received: from gatekeeper.verisim.com (207.134.10.201) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 24 May 1997 16:43:16 -0000 Received: from callandor ([192.168.1.3]) by gatekeeper.verisim.com with smtp id m0wVJuQ-000H33C (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Sat, 24 May 1997 12:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Sender: bcwhite Message-ID: <33871A99.64CB98AA@verisim.com> Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 12:42:46 -0400 From: Brian White Organization: Verisim, Inc. http://www.verisim.com/ X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.29 i486) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bugs Subject: dpkg-buildpackage order of operations Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: dpkg-dev Version: 1.4.0.8 This isn't a bug... just an idea. Would it be possible to change "dpkg-buildpackage" such that it makes the binary packages before the source packages? This has two advantages I can see: 1) Since the maintainer has probably just finished building a binary package and has been testing installing it, there is likely nothing to be done for the "build" step and thus the "buildpackage" command would take far less time. 2) Making the source package last means that all derived files are automaticially cleaned out and not left around. Since "buildpackage" is likely the very last step in the process, those derived files are probably not going to be used for a while anyway and won't end up forgotten about and taking up large amounts of disk space. Brian ( bcwhite@verisim.com ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Touch passion when it comes your way. It's rare enough as it is; don't walk away when it calls you by name. -- Marcus (Babylon 5)