<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#6688</code>; Package <code>general</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgdebian-devel@lists.debian.org

Subject: Bug#6688: release configuration not managed properly
Reply-To: daniel@compass-da.com, 6688@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: "Daniel S. Barclay" <daniel@compass-da.com>
Orignal-Sender: daniel@compass-da.com
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:33:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6688.B.85371996220092@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: iwj@debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Package: general
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.85371996220092
          (code B ref -1); Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:33:02 GMT
Sender: daniel@compass-da.com
Message-Id: <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 19:24:49 -0500
From: "Daniel S. Barclay" <daniel@compass-da.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.27 i486)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: general
Version: 1.2.3

Problem:  Something may still be missing in Debian's policies
and/or procedures for adding packags to the stable releases.   It 
appears the someone is still placing in the stable release area
(1.2.x) packages that depend on other package versions that are
_not_ in the stable release area.

For example, unless I've updated incorrectly (I use dftp), perl-suid
from the stable area (Debian-1.2-fixed as of 97/01/19) depends on perl
version 5.003-07-5.   However, the perl version in the stable area is
version 5.003.07-2. 

(That is, I have been updating my system with dftp, I think I
have the latest perl version installed (but that's where I could
have something wrong), I just tried updating with dftp, and for
perl-suid it reported that it needed perl version 5.003-07-5 but
only version 5.003.07-2 is installed.)

This has been happening a lot.

Suggested Fix:  I think your release procedures should include checking
for such erroneous dependencies (e.g., running a script (or some dpkg
option?) to check for such problems before a new release directory is
finally released).  That is, check that all depended-on packages,
of the right version numbers, are actually in the stable release
area.


Daniel
-- 
Daniel S. Barclay
daniel@compass-da.com



<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>daniel@compass-da.com</code>:<br>
New bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>debian-devel@lists.debian.org</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: daniel@compass-da.com
Subject: Bug#6688: Acknowledgement (was: release configuration not managed properly)
Message-ID: <handler.6688.B.85371996220092.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>
References: <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 debian-devel@lists.debian.org

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 6688@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, Debian bug tracking system)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 1997 00:26:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 20090 invoked from network); 20 Jan 1997 00:26:00 -0000
Received: from gateway.compass-da.com (HELO extractor.compass-da.com) (firewall-user@162.17.253.11)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 1997 00:26:00 -0000
Received: by extractor.compass-da.com; id AA22413; Sun, 19 Jan 97 16:22:48 PST
Received: from clsi(162.17.30.22) by gateway.compass-da.com via smap (3.2)
	id xma022400; Sun, 19 Jan 97 16:22:23 -0800
Received: from darkstar (daniel@darkstar [162.17.30.95]) by clsi.columbia.compass-da.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA02480; Sun, 19 Jan 1997 19:26:08 -0500
Reply-To: daniel@compass-da.com
Sender: daniel@compass-da.com
Message-Id: <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 19:24:49 -0500
From: "Daniel S. Barclay" <daniel@compass-da.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.27 i486)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: release configuration not managed properly
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: general
Version: 1.2.3

Problem:  Something may still be missing in Debian's policies
and/or procedures for adding packags to the stable releases.   It 
appears the someone is still placing in the stable release area
(1.2.x) packages that depend on other package versions that are
_not_ in the stable release area.

For example, unless I've updated incorrectly (I use dftp), perl-suid
from the stable area (Debian-1.2-fixed as of 97/01/19) depends on perl
version 5.003-07-5.   However, the perl version in the stable area is
version 5.003.07-2. 

(That is, I have been updating my system with dftp, I think I
have the latest perl version installed (but that's where I could
have something wrong), I just tried updating with dftp, and for
perl-suid it reported that it needed perl version 5.003-07-5 but
only version 5.003.07-2 is installed.)

This has been happening a lot.

Suggested Fix:  I think your release procedures should include checking
for such erroneous dependencies (e.g., running a script (or some dpkg
option?) to check for such problems before a new release directory is
finally released).  That is, check that all depended-on packages,
of the right version numbers, are actually in the stable release
area.


Daniel
-- 
Daniel S. Barclay
daniel@compass-da.com



<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-devel@lists.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#6688</code>; Package <code>general</code>.


debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Subject: Bug#6688: Old bugs need to be looked at
Reply-To: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer), 6688-maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
Resent-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 1998 11:36:48 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.6688.M6688.8863326343933@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: iwj@debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 6688
X-Debian-PR-Package: general
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 6688-maintonly@bugs.debian.org id=M6688.8863326343933
          (code M ref 6688); Sun, 01 Feb 1998 11:36:48 GMT
Message-Id: <m0xyxaa-0013wGC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 12:29:28 +0100 (CET)
From: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
To: 6688-maintonly@bugs.debian.org

This is an automated message sent to all bugs older than one year.

This bug is very old. Please take a look at it and see if you can fix it.
If it has already been fixed, please close it.

If you have problems fixing it or if you don't have the time to fix it,
please ask the people on debian-devel@lists.debian.org for help, so that
at least the oldest bugs can be solved before Debian 2.0 is released.

Remco Blaakmeer



<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to maintainer.  Copy sent to <code>debian-devel@lists.debian.org</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
Subject: Bug#6688: Info received for maintainer only
         (was Old bugs need to be looked at)
Message-ID: <handler.6688.M6688.8863326343933.ackinfomaint@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <m0xyxaa-0013wGC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
References: <m0xyxaa-0013wGC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 6688

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) (but
not to the mailing list) to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 debian-devel@lists.debian.org

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 6688-maintonly@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)



Received: (at 6688-maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 1998 11:30:34 +0000
Received: (qmail 3930 invoked by uid 71); 1 Feb 1998 11:30:34 -0000
Received: from cal011205.student.utwente.nl (HELO blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl) (root@130.89.222.95)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 1 Feb 1998 11:30:34 -0000
Received: by blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl
	id m0xyxaa-0013wGC
	(Debian Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2); Sun, 1 Feb 1998 12:29:28 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <m0xyxaa-0013wGC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 12:29:28 +0100 (CET)
From: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
To: 6688-maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Old bugs need to be looked at

This is an automated message sent to all bugs older than one year.

This bug is very old. Please take a look at it and see if you can fix it.
If it has already been fixed, please close it.

If you have problems fixing it or if you don't have the time to fix it,
please ask the people on debian-devel@lists.debian.org for help, so that
at least the oldest bugs can be solved before Debian 2.0 is released.

Remco Blaakmeer



<strong>Severity set to `wishlist'.</strong>
Request was from <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 1998 16:30:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 10034 invoked from network); 13 Feb 1998 16:28:01 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (root@158.49.8.2)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 13 Feb 1998 16:28:01 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02161
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:22:50 +0100
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.32.40])
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA31309
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:24:18 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:22:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980213172114.533A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

severity 6688 wishlist
reassign 6688 ftp.debian.org
merge 6688 4378
stop




<strong>Bug reassigned from package `general' to `ftp.debian.org'.</strong>
Request was from <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 1998 16:30:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 10034 invoked from network); 13 Feb 1998 16:28:01 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (root@158.49.8.2)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 13 Feb 1998 16:28:01 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02161
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:22:50 +0100
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.32.40])
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA31309
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:24:18 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:22:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980213172114.533A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

severity 6688 wishlist
reassign 6688 ftp.debian.org
merge 6688 4378
stop




<strong>Merged 4378 6688 9857.</strong>
Request was from <code>Santiago Vila &lt;sanvila@unex.es&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 1998 16:30:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 10034 invoked from network); 13 Feb 1998 16:28:01 -0000
Received: from pizarro.unex.es (root@158.49.8.2)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 13 Feb 1998 16:28:01 -0000
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (root@guadiana.unex.es [158.49.8.233])
	by pizarro.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02161
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:22:50 +0100
Received: from cantor.unex.es (sanvila@cantor.unex.es [158.49.32.40])
	by guadiana.unex.es (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA31309
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:24:18 +0100
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 17:22:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Reply-To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980213172114.533A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

severity 6688 wishlist
reassign 6688 ftp.debian.org
merge 6688 4378
stop




<strong>Merged 4378 6688 9857 37407.</strong>
Request was from <code>Richard Braakman &lt;dark@xs4all.nl&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 1999 14:16:10 +0000
Received: (qmail 22908 invoked from network); 22 May 1999 14:16:09 -0000
Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl (194.109.6.51)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 22 May 1999 14:16:09 -0000
Received: from night (mail@dc2-modem3052.dial.xs4all.nl [194.109.139.236])
	by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA10637
	for <control@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 22 May 1999 16:16:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dark by night with local (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian))
	id 10lCYn-0000oT-00; Sat, 22 May 1999 16:15:33 +0200
Subject: same bug
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 16:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL52 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E10lCYn-0000oT-00@night>
From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>

severity 37407 wishlist
merge 37407 4378
thanks




<strong>Reply sent</strong> to <code>James Troup &lt;james@nocrew.org&gt;</code>:<br>
You have taken responsibility.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Cc: James Troup and others <ftpmaster@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#6688: marked as done (release configuration not managed properly)
Message-ID: <handler.6688.D4378.106574469516249.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <87fzi2kl3f.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local>
References: <87fzi2kl3f.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local> <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 6688
X-Debian-PR-Package: ftp.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 

Your message dated Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:11:32 +0100
with message-id <87fzi2kl3f.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local>
and subject line dinstall: Dependencies should be checked automatically
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 1997 00:26:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 20090 invoked from network); 20 Jan 1997 00:26:00 -0000
Received: from gateway.compass-da.com (HELO extractor.compass-da.com) (firewall-user@162.17.253.11)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 1997 00:26:00 -0000
Received: by extractor.compass-da.com; id AA22413; Sun, 19 Jan 97 16:22:48 PST
Received: from clsi(162.17.30.22) by gateway.compass-da.com via smap (3.2)
	id xma022400; Sun, 19 Jan 97 16:22:23 -0800
Received: from darkstar (daniel@darkstar [162.17.30.95]) by clsi.columbia.compass-da.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA02480; Sun, 19 Jan 1997 19:26:08 -0500
Reply-To: daniel@compass-da.com
Sender: daniel@compass-da.com
Message-Id: <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 19:24:49 -0500
From: "Daniel S. Barclay" <daniel@compass-da.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.27 i486)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: release configuration not managed properly
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: general
Version: 1.2.3

Problem:  Something may still be missing in Debian's policies
and/or procedures for adding packags to the stable releases.   It 
appears the someone is still placing in the stable release area
(1.2.x) packages that depend on other package versions that are
_not_ in the stable release area.

For example, unless I've updated incorrectly (I use dftp), perl-suid
from the stable area (Debian-1.2-fixed as of 97/01/19) depends on perl
version 5.003-07-5.   However, the perl version in the stable area is
version 5.003.07-2. 

(That is, I have been updating my system with dftp, I think I
have the latest perl version installed (but that's where I could
have something wrong), I just tried updating with dftp, and for
perl-suid it reported that it needed perl version 5.003-07-5 but
only version 5.003.07-2 is installed.)

This has been happening a lot.

Suggested Fix:  I think your release procedures should include checking
for such erroneous dependencies (e.g., running a script (or some dpkg
option?) to check for such problems before a new release directory is
finally released).  That is, check that all depended-on packages,
of the right version numbers, are actually in the stable release
area.


Daniel
-- 
Daniel S. Barclay
daniel@compass-da.com
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 4378-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2003 00:11:35 +0000
From james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk Thu Oct 09 19:11:35 2003
Return-path: <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Received: from cpc1-leed3-6-0-cust171.ldst.cable.ntl.com (shiri.gloaming.local) [80.6.171.171] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A7ksX-0004Dn-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:11:33 -0500
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A7ksW-0004r5-00
	for <4378-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:11:32 +0100
To: 4378-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: dinstall: Dependencies should be checked automatically
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:11:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87fzi2kl3f.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/20.7 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: 4378-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Hi,

Since britney now ensure the consistency of a release I think this bug
can be close.

-- 
James



<strong>Notification sent</strong> to <code>daniel@compass-da.com</code>:<br>
Bug acknowledged by developer.


-t

X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: daniel@compass-da.com
Subject: Bug#6688 acknowledged by developer
         (Re: dinstall: Dependencies should be checked automatically)
Message-ID: <handler.6688.D4378.106574469516249.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>
References: <87fzi2kl3f.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local> <32E2BB51.723DDA4B@compass-da.com>
X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed 6688
X-Debian-PR-Package: ftp.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Reply-To: 6688@bugs.debian.org

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#6688: release configuration not managed properly,
which was filed against the ftp.debian.org package.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
James Troup <james@nocrew.org>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 4378-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2003 00:11:35 +0000
From james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk Thu Oct 09 19:11:35 2003
Return-path: <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Received: from cpc1-leed3-6-0-cust171.ldst.cable.ntl.com (shiri.gloaming.local) [80.6.171.171] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A7ksX-0004Dn-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:11:33 -0500
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A7ksW-0004r5-00
	for <4378-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:11:32 +0100
To: 4378-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: dinstall: Dependencies should be checked automatically
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:11:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87fzi2kl3f.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/20.7 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: 4378-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Hi,

Since britney now ensure the consistency of a release I think this bug
can be close.

-- 
James



Received: (at 4378-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Oct 2003 00:11:35 +0000
From james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk Thu Oct 09 19:11:35 2003
Return-path: <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Received: from cpc1-leed3-6-0-cust171.ldst.cable.ntl.com (shiri.gloaming.local) [80.6.171.171] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A7ksX-0004Dn-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:11:33 -0500
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A7ksW-0004r5-00
	for <4378-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:11:32 +0100
To: 4378-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: dinstall: Dependencies should be checked automatically
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 01:11:32 +0100
Message-ID: <87fzi2kl3f.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/20.7 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: 4378-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Hi,

Since britney now ensure the consistency of a release I think this bug
can be close.

-- 
James