Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ian Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>:
Bug#9887; Package bugs.debian.org.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgIan Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Acknowledgement sent to daniel@compass-da.com:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Ian Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>.   daniel@compass-da.com  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 1997 15:17:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 22188 invoked from network); 17 May 1997 15:17:55 -0000 Received: from gateway.compass-da.com (HELO extractor.compass-da.com) (firewall-user@162.17.253.11) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 May 1997 15:17:55 -0000 Received: by extractor.compass-da.com; id AA13858; Sat, 17 May 97 08:17:50 PDT Received: from clsi.columbia.compass-da.com(162.17.30.22) by gateway.compass-da.com via smap (V1.3) id xma013856; Sat, 17 May 97 08:17:25 -0700 Received: from darkstar (daniel@darkstar.columbia.compass-da.com [162.17.30.95]) by clsi.columbia.compass-da.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA03695; Sat, 17 May 1997 11:08:00 -0400 Reply-To: daniel@compass-da.com Sender: daniel@compass-da.com Message-Id: <337DCCA0.7C9170F8@compass-da.com> Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 11:20:00 -0400 From: "Daniel S. Barclay" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; U; Linux 2.0.27 i486) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: submit@bugs.debian.org Subject: suggession: pseudo-package for undocumented things Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit package: bugs.debian.org version: unknown Regarding the list of pseudo-packages for bug reporting given on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pseudopackages.html, there should be a pseudo-package for reporting things that are not documented and for which it's unclear where they should be documented. Daniel -- Daniel S. Barclay daniel@compass-da.com / dsb@smart.net   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ian Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>:
Bug#9887; Package bugs.debian.org.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgIan Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Acknowledgement sent to Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Ian Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>.   Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Received: (at 9887) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 1997 07:01:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 11540 invoked from network); 4 Jun 1997 07:01:25 -0000 Received: from slip-121-10.ots.utexas.edu (root@128.83.221.10) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 1997 07:01:25 -0000 Received: by slip-121-10.ots.utexas.edu id m0wZA3E-000GGYC (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Wed, 4 Jun 1997 02:00:08 -0500 (CDT) To: daniel@compass-da.com, 9887@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#9887: suggession: pseudo-package for undocumented things References: <337DCCA0.7C9170F8@compass-da.com> From: Guy Maor Date: 04 Jun 1997 02:00:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: "Daniel S. Barclay"'s message of Sat, 17 May 1997 11:20:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87wwoaj1jb.fsf@slip-121-10.ots.utexas.edu> Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 "Daniel S. Barclay" writes: > Regarding the list of pseudo-packages for bug reporting given on > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pseudopackages.html, there should > be a pseudo-package for reporting things that are not documented > and for which it's unclear where they should be documented. Would `general' not fit the bill? Guy   Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Ian Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>:
Bug#9887; Package bugs.debian.org.   debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.orgIan Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Acknowledgement sent to daniel@compass-da.com:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Ian Jackson <owner@bugs.debian.org>.   daniel@compass-da.com  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Received: (at 9887) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 1997 14:29:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 28641 invoked from network); 4 Jun 1997 14:29:00 -0000 Received: from gateway.compass-da.com (HELO extractor.compass-da.com) (firewall-user@162.17.253.11) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 1997 14:29:00 -0000 Received: by extractor.compass-da.com; id AA17854; Wed, 4 Jun 97 07:28:52 PDT Received: from clsi.columbia.compass-da.com(162.17.30.22) by gateway.compass-da.com via smap (V1.3) id xma017845; Wed, 4 Jun 97 07:28:46 -0700 Received: from ultra.tibu (ultra.columbia.compass-da.com [162.17.30.15]) by clsi.columbia.compass-da.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA18403; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 10:28:50 -0400 Reply-To: daniel@compass-da.com Received: by ultra.tibu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA20286; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 10:28:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 10:28:54 -0400 Message-Id: <199706041428.KAA20286@ultra.tibu> From: "Daniel S. Barclay" To: maor@ece.utexas.edu Cc: 9887@bugs.debian.org In-Reply-To: <87wwoaj1jb.fsf@slip-121-10.ots.utexas.edu> (message from Guy Maor on 04 Jun 1997 02:00:08 -0500) Subject: Re: Bug#9887: suggession: pseudo-package for undocumented things > From: Guy Maor > > Regarding the list of pseudo-packages for bug reporting given on > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/pseudopackages.html, there should > > be a pseudo-package for reporting things that are not documented > > and for which it's unclear where they should be documented. > > Would `general' not fit the bill? Generally, yes ( :-) ), but... I think I was thinking that having a (sub)category for general documentation problems would focus a little more attention on missing documentation (or rather indicate that filling in any holes is important). But I guess "general" will do for now. Daniel