<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#10285</code>.


debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org

Subject: Bug#10285: README.tunnel
Reply-To: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>, 10285@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 05:48:02 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.10285.B.86523041115704@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: iwj@debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 10285
X-Debian-PR-Package: 
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.86523041115704
          (code B ref -1); Mon, 02 Jun 1997 05:48:02 GMT
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
From: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Message-Id: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org


Info in linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel doesn't seem to correspond
with the actual new_tunnel.c being shipped.  I'm thrashing my way
slowly through anyhow, since I need it running, but it's chewing up
lots of my time since I'm totally ignorant of modules and Linux
kernel stuff... or was when I began, at least.  Be nice if other
people were saved the trouble!

The first two example lines in README.tunnel are in fact both wrong,
which would matter less if any other documentation existed :) ...

The
  insmod ipip.o; insmod tunnel.o
won't work 'cause the file is now "new_tunnel.o".  (Ok, mebbe anyone
who can't figure that out deserves to suffer, but it's nicer to have
it right...)
The 
 ifconfig tunl 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
will fail because the devices are now numbered, apparently: One needs
 ifconfig tunl0 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
Figuring that out took me several chronological weeks of cleaning off
my disk and installing Debian completely from scratch to make sure
nothing was trashed, updating to the very latest 2.0.x release to see
if it was a recently fixed bug, trying tun1 instead of tunl on the
assumption the doc had a typo (close, but no cigar!) &tc...
 I think I'll take a week's vacation before tackling line three in the
docs :)



<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Cynbe ru Taren &lt;cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu&gt;</code>:<br>
New bug report received and forwarded.<p>
<P>

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.
<P>

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.
<P>

<p>



-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Subject: Bug#10285: Acknowledgement (was: README.tunnel)
Message-ID: <handler.10285.B.86523041115704.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
References: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack 10285

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 10285@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
psuedo-header at all.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report; please ensure that you say which package(s) and
version(s) the problem is with next time.  Some time in the future the
problem reports system may start rejecting such messages.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, Debian bug tracking system)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 15702 invoked from network); 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: from laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (cynbe@128.83.194.15)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: (from cynbe@localhost) by laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) id AAA18895 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
From: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Message-Id: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: README.tunnel


Info in linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel doesn't seem to correspond
with the actual new_tunnel.c being shipped.  I'm thrashing my way
slowly through anyhow, since I need it running, but it's chewing up
lots of my time since I'm totally ignorant of modules and Linux
kernel stuff... or was when I began, at least.  Be nice if other
people were saved the trouble!

The first two example lines in README.tunnel are in fact both wrong,
which would matter less if any other documentation existed :) ...

The
  insmod ipip.o; insmod tunnel.o
won't work 'cause the file is now "new_tunnel.o".  (Ok, mebbe anyone
who can't figure that out deserves to suffer, but it's nicer to have
it right...)
The 
 ifconfig tunl 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
will fail because the devices are now numbered, apparently: One needs
 ifconfig tunl0 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
Figuring that out took me several chronological weeks of cleaning off
my disk and installing Debian completely from scratch to make sure
nothing was trashed, updating to the very latest 2.0.x release to see
if it was a recently fixed bug, trying tun1 instead of tunl on the
assumption the doc had a typo (close, but no cigar!) &tc...
 I think I'll take a week's vacation before tackling line three in the
docs :)



<strong>Bug assigned to package `kernel'.</strong>
Request was from <code>Guy Maor &lt;maor@ece.utexas.edu&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 1997 15:53:44 +0000
Received: (qmail 23734 invoked from network); 3 Jun 1997 15:53:43 -0000
Received: from slip-121-10.ots.utexas.edu (root@128.83.221.10)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 1997 15:53:43 -0000
Received: by slip-121-10.ots.utexas.edu
	id m0wYvst-000GGYC
	(Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Tue, 3 Jun 1997 10:52:31 -0500 (CDT)
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: c
From: Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>
Date: 03 Jun 1997 10:52:30 -0500
Message-ID: <877mgblm4h.fsf@slip-121-10.ots.utexas.edu>
Lines: 2
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34

reassign 10285 kernel
reassign 10292 fdutils



<strong>Bug reassigned from package `kernel' to `kernel'.</strong>
Request was from <code>Sven Rudolph &lt;sr1@os.inf.tu-dresden.de&gt;</code>
to <code>control@bugs.debian.org</code>. 


Received: (at control) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 1997 19:11:38 +0000
Received: (qmail 22257 invoked from network); 5 Jun 1997 19:11:28 -0000
Received: from os.inf.tu-dresden.de (141.76.1.46)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 1997 19:11:21 -0000
Received: (from sr1@localhost)
	by os.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA03825;
	Thu, 5 Jun 1997 21:11:07 +0200
To: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: reassignments
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Sven Rudolph <sr1@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Date: 05 Jun 1997 21:11:07 +0200
Message-ID: <87k9k8dfw4.fsf@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Lines: 8

reassign 10298 dpkg
reassign 10285 kernel
reassign 10292 fdutils



-- 
Sven Rudolph <sr1@inf.tu-dresden.de> ; WWW : http://www.sax.de/~sr1/



<strong>Reply sent</strong> to <code>Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@greathan.apana.org.au&gt;</code>:<br>
You have marked bug as forwarded.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@debian.org>
Bcc: debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#10285: marked as forwarded (was: README.tunnel)
Message-ID: <handler.10285.F10285.8662847716141.ackfwdd@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <199706130559.PAA01884@greathan.apana.org.au>
References: <199706130559.PAA01884@greathan.apana.org.au> <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
X-Debian-PR-Message: forwarded 10285

Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:59:25 +1000 (EST)
with message-id <199706130559.PAA01884@greathan.apana.org.au>
and subject line README.tunnel (fwd)
has caused the Debian bug report #10285,
regarding README.tunnel
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) 10285-forwarded@bugs.debian.org.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, Debian bug tracking system)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 15702 invoked from network); 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: from laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (cynbe@128.83.194.15)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: (from cynbe@localhost) by laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) id AAA18895 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
From: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Message-Id: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: README.tunnel


Info in linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel doesn't seem to correspond
with the actual new_tunnel.c being shipped.  I'm thrashing my way
slowly through anyhow, since I need it running, but it's chewing up
lots of my time since I'm totally ignorant of modules and Linux
kernel stuff... or was when I began, at least.  Be nice if other
people were saved the trouble!

The first two example lines in README.tunnel are in fact both wrong,
which would matter less if any other documentation existed :) ...

The
  insmod ipip.o; insmod tunnel.o
won't work 'cause the file is now "new_tunnel.o".  (Ok, mebbe anyone
who can't figure that out deserves to suffer, but it's nicer to have
it right...)
The 
 ifconfig tunl 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
will fail because the devices are now numbered, apparently: One needs
 ifconfig tunl0 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
Figuring that out took me several chronological weeks of cleaning off
my disk and installing Debian completely from scratch to make sure
nothing was trashed, updating to the very latest 2.0.x release to see
if it was a recently fixed bug, trying tun1 instead of tunl on the
assumption the doc had a typo (close, but no cigar!) &tc...
 I think I'll take a week's vacation before tackling line three in the
docs :)



Received: (at 10285-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 1997 10:39:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 6139 invoked from network); 14 Jun 1997 10:39:30 -0000
Received: from cartridge.i-connect.net (qmailr@206.190.143.12)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 1997 10:39:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 11993 invoked from network); 13 Jun 1997 06:12:52 -0000
Received: from greathan.apana.org.au (herbert@203.14.152.113)
  by cartridge.i-connect.net with SMTP; 13 Jun 1997 06:12:51 -0000
Received: (from herbert@localhost)
	by greathan.apana.org.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA01884
	for 10285-forwarded@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:59:27 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
Message-Id: <199706130559.PAA01884@greathan.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: README.tunnel (fwd)
To: 10285-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:59:25 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

----- Forwarded message from Jon Lewis -----

From jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net  Fri Jun 13 15:56:44 1997
Received: from inorganic5.fdt.net (jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net [205.229.48.42])
	by greathan.apana.org.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA01876
	for <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:56:37 +1000
Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost)
	by inorganic5.fdt.net  with SMTP id BAA09329
	for <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 01:56:35 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 01:56:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: README.tunnel (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199706130525.PAA01646@greathan.apana.org.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970613015556.31682m-100000@inorganic5.fdt.net>

On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Herbert Xu wrote:

> Info in linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel doesn't seem to correspond
> with the actual new_tunnel.c being shipped.  I'm thrashing my way
> slowly through anyhow, since I need it running, but it's chewing up
> lots of my time since I'm totally ignorant of modules and Linux
> kernel stuff... or was when I began, at least.  Be nice if other
> people were saved the trouble!

Did you eventually get it working?  I found the errors you mentioned, but
still never quite got it to work.


------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net>  |  Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
 Network Administrator       |  be proof-read for $199/message.
 Florida Digital Turnpike    |  
________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______

----- End of forwarded message from Jon Lewis -----

-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://greathan.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://greathan.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



Received: (at 10285-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 1997 13:46:11 +0000
Received: (qmail 15316 invoked from network); 14 Jun 1997 13:46:10 -0000
Received: from cartridge.i-connect.net (qmailr@206.190.143.12)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 1997 13:46:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 11647 invoked from network); 13 Jun 1997 05:39:31 -0000
Received: from greathan.apana.org.au (herbert@203.14.152.113)
  by cartridge.i-connect.net with SMTP; 13 Jun 1997 05:39:30 -0000
Received: (from herbert@localhost)
	by greathan.apana.org.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA01646;
	Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:25:38 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
Message-Id: <199706130525.PAA01646@greathan.apana.org.au>
Subject: README.tunnel (fwd)
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 15:25:37 +1000 (EST)
Cc: 10285-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
Reply-To: cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu, 10285-forwarded@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

----- Forwarded message from Cynbe ru Taren -----

From - Fri Jun 13 15:23:53 EST 1997
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 15702 invoked from network); 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: from laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (cynbe@128.83.194.15)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: (from cynbe@localhost) by laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) id AAA18895 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
From: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Message-Id: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: README.tunnel

Info in linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel doesn't seem to correspond
with the actual new_tunnel.c being shipped.  I'm thrashing my way
slowly through anyhow, since I need it running, but it's chewing up
lots of my time since I'm totally ignorant of modules and Linux
kernel stuff... or was when I began, at least.  Be nice if other
people were saved the trouble!

The first two example lines in README.tunnel are in fact both wrong,
which would matter less if any other documentation existed :) ...

The
  insmod ipip.o; insmod tunnel.o
won't work 'cause the file is now "new_tunnel.o".  (Ok, mebbe anyone
who can't figure that out deserves to suffer, but it's nicer to have
it right...)
The
 ifconfig tunl 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
will fail because the devices are now numbered, apparently: One needs
 ifconfig tunl0 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
Figuring that out took me several chronological weeks of cleaning off
my disk and installing Debian completely from scratch to make sure
nothing was trashed, updating to the very latest 2.0.x release to see
if it was a recently fixed bug, trying tun1 instead of tunl on the
assumption the doc had a typo (close, but no cigar!) &tc...
 I think I'll take a week's vacation before tackling line three in the
docs :)

----- End of forwarded message from Cynbe ru Taren -----

-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@greathan.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://greathan.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://greathan.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt



Received: (at 10285-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 1998 09:26:13 +0000
Received: (qmail 25455 invoked from network); 28 Aug 1998 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from tor-smtp1.netcom.ca (207.181.101.69)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 28 Aug 1998 09:26:13 -0000
Received: from VE462m0Eq (kin-on1-21.netcom.ca [207.181.96.85])
	by tor-smtp1.netcom.ca (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7) with SMTP id FAA20799;
	Fri, 28 Aug 1998 05:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: sangun@istar.ca
DATE: 26 Aug 98 4:10:42 PM
Message-ID: <8BIA2zVU8gkD>
SUBJECT: Your Family Histroy


Discover Your Family History - Rated "Cool Site of the Week"

                Come visit our website at,
<a href="http://www.products-services.com/names/trace2.htm">Free
Search</a>
(if the above link is busy please use...)
<a href="http://members.tripod.com/~whoiswhois/names.htm">Free
Search</a>

        Do you know WHO your ancestors are and WHAT they did?
        Do you know WHEN your surname first appeared?
        Are you curious about WHERE your family roots originate?

Now you can fill in the missing pieces of this puzzle.
Join the satisfied multitudes who have discovered their complete Family Surname History.

All Nationalities. It's easy. Just key your last name into our online
index, and in seconds we will tell you it's origin and much MORE.  See if we've researched your complete family name history during our 25 years of professional research.

Read a sample history, plus - FREE Coat of Arms keychain with your
family's most ancient coat of arms & crest. All in full color. Your
family name history parchment is 11 x 17", approximately 1700 words. It is beautifully ILLUMINATED by your most ancient Coat of Arms in full authentic Heraldic Colors.  Over 500 URLs on family and heraldic
history.

Please come visit our website at,
<a href="http://www.products-services.com/names/trace2.htm">Free
Search</a>
(if the above link is busy please use...)
<a href="http://members.tripod.com/~whoiswhois/names.htm">Free
Search</a>



Hall of Names International Inc.
1-888-My-Roots  (1-888-697-6687)

[remhon@yahoo.com]
Come Visit.	



<strong>Reply sent</strong> to <code>Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;</code>:<br>
You have taken responsibility.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@debian.org>
Bcc: debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#10285: marked as done (README.tunnel)
Message-ID: <handler.10285.D10285.94317194926197.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <19991121191144.A14159@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <19991121191144.A14159@gondor.apana.org.au> <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 10285

Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:11:44 +1100
with message-id <19991121191144.A14159@gondor.apana.org.au>
and subject line fixed in 2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 15702 invoked from network); 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: from laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (cynbe@128.83.194.15)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 1997 05:46:48 -0000
Received: (from cynbe@localhost) by laurel.actlab.utexas.edu (8.8.4/8.6.12) id AAA18895 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 00:46:44 -0500
From: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Message-Id: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: README.tunnel


Info in linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel doesn't seem to correspond
with the actual new_tunnel.c being shipped.  I'm thrashing my way
slowly through anyhow, since I need it running, but it's chewing up
lots of my time since I'm totally ignorant of modules and Linux
kernel stuff... or was when I began, at least.  Be nice if other
people were saved the trouble!

The first two example lines in README.tunnel are in fact both wrong,
which would matter less if any other documentation existed :) ...

The
  insmod ipip.o; insmod tunnel.o
won't work 'cause the file is now "new_tunnel.o".  (Ok, mebbe anyone
who can't figure that out deserves to suffer, but it's nicer to have
it right...)
The 
 ifconfig tunl 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
will fail because the devices are now numbered, apparently: One needs
 ifconfig tunl0 111.112.100.87 pointopoint 111.112.100.86
Figuring that out took me several chronological weeks of cleaning off
my disk and installing Debian completely from scratch to make sure
nothing was trashed, updating to the very latest 2.0.x release to see
if it was a recently fixed bug, trying tun1 instead of tunl on the
assumption the doc had a typo (close, but no cigar!) &tc...
 I think I'll take a week's vacation before tackling line three in the
docs :)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 10285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 1999 08:12:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 26111 invoked from network); 21 Nov 1999 08:12:09 -0000
Received: from gondor.apana.org.au (root@203.14.152.114)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 1999 08:12:09 -0000
Received: (from herbert@localhost)
	by gondor.apana.org.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id TAA14171
	for 10285-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:11:44 +1100
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:11:44 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: 10285-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in 2.2
Message-ID: <19991121191144.A14159@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

This has been fixed in 2.2 where the said file is no longer there.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


<strong>Notification sent</strong> to <code>Cynbe ru Taren &lt;cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu&gt;</code>:<br>
Bug acknowledged by developer.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Cynbe ru Taren <cynbe@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
Subject: Bug#10285 acknowledged by developer (README.tunnel)
Message-ID: <handler.10285.D10285.94317194926197.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
References: <19991121191144.A14159@gondor.apana.org.au> <199706020546.AAA18895@laurel.actlab.utexas.edu>
X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed 10285

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer directly, or email
submit@bugs.debian.org or me.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 10285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 1999 08:12:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 26111 invoked from network); 21 Nov 1999 08:12:09 -0000
Received: from gondor.apana.org.au (root@203.14.152.114)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 1999 08:12:09 -0000
Received: (from herbert@localhost)
	by gondor.apana.org.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id TAA14171
	for 10285-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:11:44 +1100
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:11:44 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: 10285-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in 2.2
Message-ID: <19991121191144.A14159@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

This has been fixed in 2.2 where the said file is no longer there.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


Received: (at 10285-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 1999 08:12:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 26111 invoked from network); 21 Nov 1999 08:12:09 -0000
Received: from gondor.apana.org.au (root@203.14.152.114)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 21 Nov 1999 08:12:09 -0000
Received: (from herbert@localhost)
	by gondor.apana.org.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id TAA14171
	for 10285-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:11:44 +1100
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 19:11:44 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: 10285-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in 2.2
Message-ID: <19991121191144.A14159@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

This has been fixed in 2.2 where the said file is no longer there.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt