<strong>Report forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#4975</code>; Package <code>fwtk</code>.


debian-devel@lists.debian.orgMichael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

Subject: Bug#4975: fwtk misses x-gw binary
Reply-To: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, 4975@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
Resent-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>
Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 17:48:12 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.4975.B.84635162630073@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: iwj@debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Package: fwtk
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.84635162630073
          (code B ref -1); Sat, 26 Oct 1996 17:48:12 GMT
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
Message-Id: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 15:19:48 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: fwtk
Version: 1.3-1

Maybe I didn't understand it correctly, but shouldn't fwtk have an x-gw
binary? It does have a manpage for it: x-gw.8.

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes                   |    _____ ________ __  ____
meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de |   / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___  __________
meskes@sanet.de                  |   \__ \/ /_  / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
meskes@debian.org                |  ___/ / __/ /__  __/\__, /  __/ /  (__  )
Use Debian GNU/Linux!            | /____/_/      /_/  /____/\___/_/  /____/



<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Michael Meskes &lt;meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE&gt;</code>:<br>
New bug report received and forwarded.  Copy sent to <code>Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
Subject: Bug#4975: Acknowledgement (was: fwtk misses x-gw binary)
Message-ID: <handler.4975.B.84635162630073.ack@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>

Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian Linux.
This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has
been received.  It is being forwarded to the developers' mailing list for
their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

If you wish to submit further information on your problem, please send
it to 4975@bugs.debian.org (and *not* to
bugs@bugs.debian.org).

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, Debian bug tracking system)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 1996 17:40:26 +0000
Received: (qmail 30054 invoked from smtpd); 26 Oct 1996 17:40:24 -0000
Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (137.226.225.2)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 1996 17:40:21 -0000
Received: from circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (root@circe.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.194.54]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12)
	with ESMTP id SAA00059 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 1996 18:29:23 +0100
Received: (from meskes@localhost) by circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.1/8.7.3) id PAA06212 for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 26 Oct 1996 15:20:04 +0200
From: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
Message-Id: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: fwtk misses x-gw binary
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 15:19:48 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: fwtk
Version: 1.3-1

Maybe I didn't understand it correctly, but shouldn't fwtk have an x-gw
binary? It does have a manpage for it: x-gw.8.

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes                   |    _____ ________ __  ____
meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de |   / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___  __________
meskes@sanet.de                  |   \__ \/ /_  / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
meskes@debian.org                |  ___/ / __/ /__  __/\__, /  __/ /  (__  )
Use Debian GNU/Linux!            | /____/_/      /_/  /____/\___/_/  /____/



<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#4975</code>; Package <code>fwtk</code>.


debian-devel@lists.debian.orgMichael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

Subject: Bug#4975: fwtk misses x-gw binary
Reply-To: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>, 4975@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Resent-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>
Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 03:18:09 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.4975.B.84638577817431@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: iwj@debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Package: fwtk
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.84638577817431
          (code B ref -1); Sun, 27 Oct 1996 03:18:09 GMT
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 22:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
X-Sender: spotter@itd
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, 4975@bugs.debian.org
Cc: submit@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Maybe the maintainer didn't compile the x proxy support because if I 
remember all the time i spent trying to compile x-gw on HPUX, it is 
difficlut and time consuming.  All the other proxies compile almost 
effortlessly, but x-gw gave me fits.

Shaya
--
Shaya Potter
spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil


On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:

> Package: fwtk
> Version: 1.3-1
> 
> Maybe I didn't understand it correctly, but shouldn't fwtk have an x-gw
> binary? It does have a manpage for it: x-gw.8.
> 
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Meskes                   |    _____ ________ __  ____
> meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de |   / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___  __________
> meskes@sanet.de                  |   \__ \/ /_  / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
> meskes@debian.org                |  ___/ / __/ /__  __/\__, /  __/ /  (__  )
> Use Debian GNU/Linux!            | /____/_/      /_/  /____/\___/_/  /____/
> 
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
> 
> 



<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Shaya Potter &lt;spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Subject: Bug#4975: Info received (was Bug#4975: fwtk misses x-gw binary)
Message-ID: <handler.4975.B.84638577817431.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers' mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 4975@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, Debian bug tracking system)



Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 1996 03:09:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 17427 invoked from smtpd); 27 Oct 1996 03:09:31 -0000
Received: from itd.nrl.navy.mil (132.250.80.2)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 1996 03:09:30 -0000
Received: from itd (itd.nrl.navy.mil) by itd.nrl.navy.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA08926; Sat, 26 Oct 96 22:56:47 EDT
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 22:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
X-Sender: spotter@itd
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, 4975@bugs.debian.org
Cc: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#4975: fwtk misses x-gw binary
In-Reply-To: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Maybe the maintainer didn't compile the x proxy support because if I 
remember all the time i spent trying to compile x-gw on HPUX, it is 
difficlut and time consuming.  All the other proxies compile almost 
effortlessly, but x-gw gave me fits.

Shaya
--
Shaya Potter
spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil


On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:

> Package: fwtk
> Version: 1.3-1
> 
> Maybe I didn't understand it correctly, but shouldn't fwtk have an x-gw
> binary? It does have a manpage for it: x-gw.8.
> 
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Meskes                   |    _____ ________ __  ____
> meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de |   / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___  __________
> meskes@sanet.de                  |   \__ \/ /_  / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
> meskes@debian.org                |  ___/ / __/ /__  __/\__, /  __/ /  (__  )
> Use Debian GNU/Linux!            | /____/_/      /_/  /____/\___/_/  /____/
> 
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
> 
> 



<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#4975</code>; Package <code>fwtk</code>.


debian-devel@lists.debian.orgMichael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

Subject: Bug#4975: fwtk misses x-gw binary
Reply-To: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>, 4975@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Resent-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>
Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 03:18:11 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.4975.B4975.84638577817430@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: iwj@debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Package: fwtk
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 4975-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B4975.84638577817430
          (code B ref 4975); Sun, 27 Oct 1996 03:18:11 GMT
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 22:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
X-Sender: spotter@itd
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, 4975@bugs.debian.org
Cc: submit@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Maybe the maintainer didn't compile the x proxy support because if I 
remember all the time i spent trying to compile x-gw on HPUX, it is 
difficlut and time consuming.  All the other proxies compile almost 
effortlessly, but x-gw gave me fits.

Shaya
--
Shaya Potter
spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil


On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:

> Package: fwtk
> Version: 1.3-1
> 
> Maybe I didn't understand it correctly, but shouldn't fwtk have an x-gw
> binary? It does have a manpage for it: x-gw.8.
> 
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Meskes                   |    _____ ________ __  ____
> meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de |   / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___  __________
> meskes@sanet.de                  |   \__ \/ /_  / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
> meskes@debian.org                |  ___/ / __/ /__  __/\__, /  __/ /  (__  )
> Use Debian GNU/Linux!            | /____/_/      /_/  /____/\___/_/  /____/
> 
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
> 
> 



<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>Shaya Potter &lt;spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil&gt;</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to list.  Copy sent to <code>Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Subject: Bug#4975: Info received (was Bug#4975: fwtk misses x-gw binary)
Message-ID: <handler.4975.B4975.84638577817430.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers' mailing list to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 4975@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(maintainer, Debian bug tracking system)



Received: (at 4975) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 1996 03:09:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 17427 invoked from smtpd); 27 Oct 1996 03:09:31 -0000
Received: from itd.nrl.navy.mil (132.250.80.2)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 1996 03:09:30 -0000
Received: from itd (itd.nrl.navy.mil) by itd.nrl.navy.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA08926; Sat, 26 Oct 96 22:56:47 EDT
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 22:56:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Shaya Potter <spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil>
X-Sender: spotter@itd
To: Michael Meskes <meskes@Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, 4975@bugs.debian.org
Cc: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#4975: fwtk misses x-gw binary
In-Reply-To: <199610261320.PAA06212@circe.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.961026225412.7991D-100000@itd>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Maybe the maintainer didn't compile the x proxy support because if I 
remember all the time i spent trying to compile x-gw on HPUX, it is 
difficlut and time consuming.  All the other proxies compile almost 
effortlessly, but x-gw gave me fits.

Shaya
--
Shaya Potter
spotter@itd.nrl.navy.mil


On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:

> Package: fwtk
> Version: 1.3-1
> 
> Maybe I didn't understand it correctly, but shouldn't fwtk have an x-gw
> binary? It does have a manpage for it: x-gw.8.
> 
> Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Meskes                   |    _____ ________ __  ____
> meskes@informatik.rwth-aachen.de |   / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___  __________
> meskes@sanet.de                  |   \__ \/ /_  / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
> meskes@debian.org                |  ___/ / __/ /__  __/\__, /  __/ /  (__  )
> Use Debian GNU/Linux!            | /____/_/      /_/  /____/\___/_/  /____/
> 
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
> 
> 



<strong>Information forwarded</strong> to <code>Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>:<br>
<code>Bug#4975</code>; Package <code>fwtk</code>.


Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

Subject: Bug#4975: Old bugs need to be looked at
Reply-To: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer), 4975-maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
Resent-To: Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>
Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 1998 11:34:04 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.4975.M4975.8863322902448@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: iwj@debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 4975
X-Debian-PR-Package: fwtk
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 4975-maintonly@bugs.debian.org id=M4975.8863322902448
          (code M ref 4975); Sun, 01 Feb 1998 11:34:04 GMT
Message-Id: <m0xyxVa-0013uxC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 12:24:18 +0100 (CET)
From: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
To: 4975-maintonly@bugs.debian.org

This is an automated message sent to all bugs older than one year.

This bug is very old. Please take a look at it and see if you can fix it.
If it has already been fixed, please close it.

If you have problems fixing it or if you don't have the time to fix it,
please ask the people on debian-devel@lists.debian.org for help, so that
at least the oldest bugs can be solved before Debian 2.0 is released.

Remco Blaakmeer



<strong>Acknowledgement sent</strong> to <code>remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)</code>:<br>
Extra info received and forwarded to maintainer.  Copy sent to <code>Michael Shields &lt;shields@crosslink.net&gt;</code>.


-t

From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Ian Jackson)
To: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
Subject: Bug#4975: Info received for maintainer only
         (was Old bugs need to be looked at)
Message-ID: <handler.4975.M4975.8863322902448.ackinfomaint@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <m0xyxVa-0013uxC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
References: <m0xyxVa-0013uxC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
X-Debian-PR-Message: ack-info 4975

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report.  It has been forwarded to the developer(s) (but
not to the mailing list) to accompany the original report.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Michael Shields <shields@crosslink.net>

If you wish to continue to submit further information on your problem,
please send it to 4975-maintonly@bugs.debian.org, as before.

Please do not reply to the address at the top of this message,
unless you wish to report a problem with the bug-tracking system.

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)



Received: (at 4975-maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 1998 11:24:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 2445 invoked by uid 71); 1 Feb 1998 11:24:49 -0000
Received: from cal011205.student.utwente.nl (HELO blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl) (root@130.89.222.95)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 1 Feb 1998 11:24:49 -0000
Received: by blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl
	id m0xyxVa-0013uxC
	(Debian Smail-3.2.0.100 1997-Dec-8 #2); Sun, 1 Feb 1998 12:24:18 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <m0xyxVa-0013uxC@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 12:24:18 +0100 (CET)
From: remco@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl (Remco Blaakmeer)
To: 4975-maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Old bugs need to be looked at

This is an automated message sent to all bugs older than one year.

This bug is very old. Please take a look at it and see if you can fix it.
If it has already been fixed, please close it.

If you have problems fixing it or if you don't have the time to fix it,
please ask the people on debian-devel@lists.debian.org for help, so that
at least the oldest bugs can be solved before Debian 2.0 is released.

Remco Blaakmeer