Report forwarded to Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>:
Bug#9714; Package minicom.   Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Acknowledgement sent to <edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>.   <edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 1997 15:28:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 7426 invoked from network); 10 May 1997 15:28:51 -0000 Received: from mail.ican.net (198.133.36.5) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 May 1997 15:28:50 -0000 Received: from miles.econ.queensu.ca (root@ppp-067.toronto-10.ican.net [206.248.86.67]) by mail.ican.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA22987; Sat, 10 May 1997 11:25:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by miles.econ.queensu.ca id m0wQE1g-0000YLC (Debian Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2); Sat, 10 May 1997 11:25:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 11:25:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Subject: xminicom invoced rxvt with -8 To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org X-Mailer: bug 2.93 Package: minicom Version: 1.75-2 Could you remove the -8 in the xminicom invocation of xminicom? I take it is there for some old version of rxvt. edd@miles:~> xminicom rxvt: obsolete option "-8"   Acknowledgement sent to Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>:
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded.

You requested that the message be sent to the package maintainer(s) but either the bug report is not associated with any package (probably because of a missing Package psuedo-header field in the original bug report), or the package(s) specified do not have any maintainer(s).

Your message has *not* been sent to any package maintainers; it has merely been filed in the bug tracking system. If you require assistance please contact owner@bugs.debian.org quoting the bug number 9714.

  Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 1997 22:11:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 297 invoked from network); 10 May 1997 22:11:24 -0000 Received: from holodeck.cistron.nl (miquels@195.64.65.32) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 May 1997 22:11:23 -0000 Received: (from miquels@localhost) by holodeck.cistron.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA19672; Sun, 11 May 1997 00:10:56 +0200 Message-ID: <19970511001056.34670@cistron.nl> Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 00:10:56 +0200 From: Miquel van Smoorenburg To: edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca, 9714-maintonly@bugs.debian.org Cc: maintonly@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#9714: xminicom invoced rxvt with -8 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: Main Body X-Mailer: Mutt 0.71 In-Reply-To: ; from edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca on Sat, May 10, 1997 at 11:25:36AM -0400 According to edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca: > Package: minicom > Version: 1.75-2 > > Could you remove the -8 in the xminicom invocation of xminicom? I take it is > there for some old version of rxvt. > > edd@miles:~> xminicom > rxvt: obsolete option "-8" Hmm. A bug was filed against rxvt for exectly this reason, however it seems that the maintainer has closed it without informing me (or fixing it!) Hm. Mike. -- | Miquel van | "I need more space" "Well, why not move to Texas" | | miquels@cistron.nl | "No, on my account, stupid." "Stupid? Uh-oh.." | | PGP fingerprint: FE 66 52 4F CD 59 A5 36 7F 39 8B 20 F1 D6 74 02 |   Acknowledgement sent to Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>:
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded.

You requested that the message be sent to the package maintainer(s) but either the bug report is not associated with any package (probably because of a missing Package psuedo-header field in the original bug report), or the package(s) specified do not have any maintainer(s).

Your message has *not* been sent to any package maintainers; it has merely been filed in the bug tracking system. If you require assistance please contact owner@bugs.debian.org quoting the bug number 9714.

  Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>  Sorry, this message was lost when this bug report was restored from a backup.   Received: (at 9714-maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 1997 22:11:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 297 invoked from network); 10 May 1997 22:11:24 -0000 Received: from holodeck.cistron.nl (miquels@195.64.65.32) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 10 May 1997 22:11:23 -0000 Received: (from miquels@localhost) by holodeck.cistron.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA19672; Sun, 11 May 1997 00:10:56 +0200 Message-ID: <19970511001056.34670@cistron.nl> Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 00:10:56 +0200 From: Miquel van Smoorenburg To: edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca, 9714-maintonly@bugs.debian.org Cc: maintonly@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#9714: xminicom invoced rxvt with -8 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: Main Body X-Mailer: Mutt 0.71 In-Reply-To: ; from edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca on Sat, May 10, 1997 at 11:25:36AM -0400 According to edd@rosebud.sps.queensu.ca: > Package: minicom > Version: 1.75-2 > > Could you remove the -8 in the xminicom invocation of xminicom? I take it is > there for some old version of rxvt. > > edd@miles:~> xminicom > rxvt: obsolete option "-8" Hmm. A bug was filed against rxvt for exectly this reason, however it seems that the maintainer has closed it without informing me (or fixing it!) Hm. Mike. -- | Miquel van | "I need more space" "Well, why not move to Texas" | | miquels@cistron.nl | "No, on my account, stupid." "Stupid? Uh-oh.." | | PGP fingerprint: FE 66 52 4F CD 59 A5 36 7F 39 8B 20 F1 D6 74 02 |